Liming Gong

dblp:19/10524 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 85% Automated reasoning and model checking · 15%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 56% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 44%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
mixed integer linear programming
1.622025
BTBS-LNS: Binarized-Tightening, Branch and Search on Learning LNS Policies for MIP · ICLR 2025
Towards Imitation Learning to Branch for MIP: A Hybrid Reinforcement Learning based Sample Augmentation Approach · ICLR 2024
Mathematical optimization › integer programming
branch-and-bound
1.022025
Towards Imitation Learning to Branch for MIP: A Hybrid Reinforcement Learning based Sample Augmentation Approach · ICLR 2024
BTBS-LNS: Binarized-Tightening, Branch and Search on Learning LNS Policies for MIP · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.912025
BTBS-LNS: Binarized-Tightening, Branch and Search on Learning LNS Policies for MIP · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization › metaheuristic optimization
large neighborhood search
0.912025
BTBS-LNS: Binarized-Tightening, Branch and Search on Learning LNS Policies for MIP · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning
0.812024
Towards Imitation Learning to Branch for MIP: A Hybrid Reinforcement Learning based Sample Augmentation Approach · ICLR 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › search control
learning to branch
0.812024
Towards Imitation Learning to Branch for MIP: A Hybrid Reinforcement Learning based Sample Augmentation Approach · ICLR 2024
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability › SAT solving
branching heuristic
0.812024
Towards Imitation Learning to Branch for MIP: A Hybrid Reinforcement Learning based Sample Augmentation Approach · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning
0.212024
Towards Imitation Learning to Branch for MIP: A Hybrid Reinforcement Learning based Sample Augmentation Approach · ICLR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sample augmentation · 1.5online reinforcement learning · 1.5offline reinforcement learning · 1.5imitation learning · 1.5branching network · 0.9bound tightening · 0.9binary encoding · 0.9attention-based tripartite graph · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 BTBS-LNS: Binarized-Tightening, Branch and Search on Learning LNS Policies for MIP
abstract
Learning to solve large-scale Mixed Integer Program (MIP) problems is an emerging research topic, and policy learning-based Large Neighborhood Search (LNS) has been a popular paradigm. However, the explored space of LNS policy is often limited even in the training phase, making the learned policy sometimes wrongly fix some potentially important variables early in the search, leading to local optimum in some cases. Moreover, many methods only assume binary variables to deal with. We present a practical approach, termed Binarized-Tightening Branch-and-Search for Large Neighborhood Search (BTBS-LNS). It comprises three key techniques: 1) the ``Binarized Tightening" technique for integer variables to handle their wide range by binary encoding and bound tightening; 2) an attention-based tripartite graph to capture global correlations among variables and constraints for an MIP instance; 3) an extra branching network as a global view, to identify and optimize wrongly-fixed backdoor variables at each search step. Experiments show its superior performance over the open-source solver SCIP and LNS baselines. Moreover, it performs competitively with, and sometimes better than the commercial solver Gurobi (v9.5.0), especially on the MIPLIB2017 benchmark chosen by Hans Mittelmann, where our method can deliver 10\% better primal gaps compared with Gurobi in a 300s cut-off time.
Hao Yuan 0002, Wenli Ouyang, Changwen Zhang, Liming Gong, Junchi Yan
ICLR5
2024 Towards Imitation Learning to Branch for MIP: A Hybrid Reinforcement Learning based Sample Augmentation Approach
abstract
Branch-and-bound (B\&B) has long been favored for tackling complex Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) problems, where the choice of branching strategy plays a pivotal role. Recently, Imitation Learning (IL)-based policies have emerged as potent alternatives to traditional rule-based approaches. However, it is nontrivial to acquire high-quality training samples, and IL often converges to suboptimal variable choices for branching, restricting the overall performance. In response to these challenges, we propose a novel hybrid online and offline reinforcement learning (RL) approach to enhance the branching policy by cost-effective training sample augmentation. In the online phase, we train an online RL agent to dynamically decide the sample generation processes, drawing from either the learning-based policy or the expert policy. The objective is to strike a balance between exploration and exploitation of the sample generation process. In the offline phase, a value function is trained to fit each decision's cumulative reward and filter the samples with high cumulative returns. This dual-purpose function not only reduces training complexity but also enhances the quality of the samples. To assess the efficacy of our data augmentation mechanism, we conduct comprehensive evaluations across a range of MIP problems. The results consistently show that it excels in making superior branching decisions compared to state-of-the-art learning-based models and the open-source solver SCIP. Notably, it even often outperforms Gurobi.
Changwen Zhang, Wenli Ouyang, Hao Yuan 0002, Liming Gong, Ziao Guo, Zhichen Dong, Junchi Yan
ICLR4