Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Pardoe
dblp:19/3579
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 30% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 30% Multi-agent systems · 17% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 77% Web and social media mining · 23% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational finance and economics · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational finance and economics
online advertising |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Audience Expansion for Online Social Network Advertising · KDD 2016 |
Information retrieval › online advertising
audience expansion |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Audience Expansion for Online Social Network Advertising · KDD 2016 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
boosting |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Boosting for Regression Transfer · ICML 2010 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › knowledge transfer
transfer regression |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Boosting for Regression Transfer · ICML 2010 |
Web and social media mining
social network analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Audience Expansion for Online Social Network Advertising · KDD 2016 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
agent-based simulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | TacTex-05: A Champion Supply Chain Management Agent · AAAI 2006 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › negotiation
automated negotiation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | TacTex-05: A Champion Supply Chain Management Agent · AAAI 2006 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › auction theory
bidding strategy |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | TacTex-05: A Champion Supply Chain Management Agent · AAAI 2006 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
partially observable markov decision process |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Learning Predictive State Representations · ICML 2003 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning › state representation learning
predictive state representation |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Learning Predictive State Representations · ICML 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hybrid strategy · 0.5campaign-aware expansion · 0.5campaign-agnostic expansion · 0.5boosting · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Audience Expansion for Online Social Network AdvertisingabstractOnline social network advertising platforms, such as that provided by LinkedIn, generally allow marketers to specify targeting options so that their ads appear to a desired demographic. Audience Expansion is a technique developed at LinkedIn to simplify targeting and identify new audiences with similar attributes to the original target audience. We developed two methods to achieve Audience Expansion: campaign-agnostic expansion and campaign-aware expansion. In this paper, we describe the details of these methods, present in-depth analysis of their trade-offs, and demonstrate a hybrid strategy that possesses the combined strength of both methods. Through large scale online experiments, we show the effectiveness of the proposed approach, and as a result, the benefits it brings to the whole marketplace including both LinkedIn and advertisers. The achieved benefits can be characterized as: 1) simplified targeting process and increased reach for advertisers, and 2) better utilization of LinkedIn's ads inventory and higher and more efficient market participation. Haishan Liu, David Pardoe, Frank Cao, Chongzhe Li |
KDD | 2 |
| 2010 | Boosting for Regression Transfer
David Pardoe, Peter Stone 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2010 | Adaptive Auction Mechanism Design and the Incorporation of Prior KnowledgeabstractElectronic auction markets are economic information systems that facilitate transactions between buyers and sellers. Whereas auction design has traditionally been an analytic process that relies on theory-driven assumptions such as bidders' rationality, bidders often exhibit unknown and variable behaviors. In this paper we present a data-driven adaptive auction mechanism that capitalizes on key properties of electronic auction markets, such as the large transaction volume, access to information, and the ability to dynamically alter the mechanism's design to acquire information about the benefits from different designs and adapt the auction mechanism online in response to actual bidders' behaviors. Our auction mechanism does not require an explicit representation of bidder behavior to infer about design profitability—a key limitation of prior approaches when they address complex auction settings. Our adaptive mechanism can also incorporate prior general knowledge of bidder behavior to enhance the search for effective designs. The data-driven adaptation and the capacity to use prior knowledge render our mechanisms particularly useful when there is uncertainty regarding bidders' behaviors or when bidders' behaviors change over time. Extensive empirical evaluations demonstrate that the adaptive mechanism outperforms any single fixed mechanism design under a variety of settings, including when bidders' strategies evolve in response to the seller's adaptation; our mechanism's performance is also more robust than that of alternatives when prior general information about bidders' behaviors differs from the encountered behaviors. David Pardoe, Peter Stone 0001, Maytal Saar-Tsechansky, Tayfun Keskin, Kerem Tomak |
INFORMS J. Comput. | 1 |
| 2006 | Adaptive mechanism design: a metalearning approachabstractAuction mechanism design has traditionally been a largely analytic process, relying on assumptions such as fully rational bidders. In practice, however, bidders often exhibit unknown and variable behavior, making them difficult to model and complicating the design process. To address this challenge, we explore the use of an adaptive auction mechanism: one that learns to adjust its parameters in response to past empirical bidder behavior so as to maximize an objective function such as auctioneer revenue. In this paper, we give an overview of our general approach and then present an instantiation in a specific auction scenario. In addition, we show how predictions of possible bidder behavior can be incorporated into the adaptive mechanism through a metalearning process. The approach is fully implemented and tested. Results indicate that the adaptive mechanism is able to outperform any single fixed mechanism, and that the addition of metalearning improves performance substantially. David Pardoe, Peter Stone 0001, Maytal Saar-Tsechansky, Kerem Tomak |
ICEC | 1 |
| 2006 | TacTex-05: A Champion Supply Chain Management Agent
David Pardoe, Peter Stone 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2005 | Evolving neural network ensembles for control problemsabstractIn neuroevolution, a genetic algorithm is used to evolve a neural network to perform a particular task. The standard approach is to evolve a population over a number of generations, and then select the final generation's champion as the end result. However, it is possible that there is valuable information present in the population that is not captured by the champion. The standard approach ignores all such information. One possible solution to this problem is to combine multiple individuals from the final population into an ensemble. This approach has been successful in supervised classification tasks, and in this paper, it is extended to evolutionary reinforcement learning in control problems. The method is evaluated on a challenging extension of the classic pole balancing task, demonstrating that an ensemble can achieve significantly better performance than the champion alone. David Pardoe, Michael S. Ryoo, Risto Miikkulainen |
GECCO | 1 |
| 2003 | Learning Predictive State Representations
Satinder Singh 0001, Michael L. Littman, Nicholas K. Jong, David Pardoe, Peter Stone 0001 |
ICML | 4 |