Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tim C. Kasse
dblp:19/3991
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering
software engineering practice |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | The State of Software Engineering Practice: A Preliminary Report · ICSE 1989 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Maturity differences between customer and supplier - challenges, problems, and possible solutionsabstractSUMMARY In a globalized world, success in business today is linked with success with outsourcing. Several factors have a strong influence in this ‘game’. It is our opinion that organizational maturity and process capability are very important. Low maturity in general is a problem in collaboration in a customer–supplier relationship. It is obvious that differences in maturity and process capability between customer and supplier will bring challenges and eventually problems. The insight into the difference in maturity between customer and supplier is important during the daily work—maybe even more important when a customer selects a supplier. It is here the ‘landscape of problems’ is formed. We have based our performance analysis on CMMI® 1.2 for each possible combination of difference in maturity between the customer and supplier. The problems initiated by the difference are described along with our best suggestion for possible solutions on the basis of our experiences from working with process improvement in companies worldwide. It is not possible to present the entire set of results of the performed analysis in this paper. Only the main results, argumentation, and conclusions will be presented. This paper describes the results and ends with a discussion and conclusion on the topic. Further work will go on, and the goal is to develop a simple tool to assist companies in their use of outsourcing support. This work is part of the 3‐year Danish SourceIT research project, an 18 person‐year project focusing on outsourcing and maturity, which is supported by the Danish Agency for Science Technology and Innovation under the Ministry of Science Technology and Innovation. Danske Bank, CSC Scandihealth, Nets, Roskilde University, and DELTA have been part of this project. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Tim C. Kasse, Jørn Johansen |
J. Softw. Evol. Process. | 1 |
| 1989 | The State of Software Engineering Practice: A Preliminary Report
Watts S. Humphrey, David H. Kitson, Tim C. Kasse |
ICSE | 3 |