VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rajkiran Panuganti
dblp:19/4223
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Compilers and program optimization › memory optimization
data locality optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Integrated Loop Optimizations for Data Locality Enhancement of Tensor Contraction Expressions · SC 2005 |
Compilers and program optimization
loop optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Integrated Loop Optimizations for Data Locality Enhancement of Tensor Contraction Expressions · SC 2005 |
Compilers and program optimization
loop transformation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Integrated Loop Optimizations for Data Locality Enhancement of Tensor Contraction Expressions · SC 2005 |
Compilers and program optimization › compiler optimization
optimization phase ordering |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Integrated Loop Optimizations for Data Locality Enhancement of Tensor Contraction Expressions · SC 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
search space reduction · 0.1pruning strategies · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Integrated Loop Optimizations for Data Locality Enhancement of Tensor Contraction ExpressionsabstractA very challenging issue for optimizing compilers is the phase ordering problem: In what order should a collection of compiler optimizations be performed? We address this problem in the context of optimizing a sequence of tensor contractions. The pertinent loop transformations are loop permutation, tiling, and fusion; in addition, the placement of disk I/O statements crucially affects performance. The space of possible combinations is exponentially large. We develop novel pruning strategies whereby a search problem in a larger space is replaced by a large number of searches in a much smaller space, to determine the optimal permutation, fusion, tiling and placement of disk I/O statements. Experimental results show that we obtain an improvement in I/O cost by a factor of up to 2.6 over an equi-tile-size approach. Swarup Kumar Sahoo, Sriram Krishnamoorthy, Rajkiran Panuganti, P. Sadayappan |
SC | 3 |
| 2005 | A learning-based method for image super-resolution from zoomed observationsabstractWe propose a technique for super-resolution imaging of a scene from observations at different camera zooms. Given a sequence of images with different zoom factors of a static scene, we obtain a picture of the entire scene at a resolution corresponding to the most zoomed observation. The high-resolution image is modeled through appropriate parameterization, and the parameters are learned from the most zoomed observation. Assuming a homogeneity of the high-resolution field, the learned model is used as a prior while super-resolving the scene. We suggest the use of either a Markov random field (MRF) or an simultaneous autoregressive (SAR) model to parameterize the field based on the computation one can afford. We substantiate the suitability of the proposed method through a large number of experimentations on both simulated and real data. Manjunath V. Joshi, Subhasis Chaudhuri, Rajkiran Panuganti |
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B | 3 |
| 2004 | Super-resolution imaging: use of zoom as a cue
Manjunath V. Joshi, Subhasis Chaudhuri, Rajkiran Panuganti |
Image Vis. Comput. | 3 |