Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Kharitonov

dblp:19/4785 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 5 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 100%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Computational complexity · 100%
Network and information security
3 papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
computational learning theory
0.011993
Cryptographic hardness of distribution-specific learning · STOC 1993
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
cryptographic hardness of learning
0.011993
Cryptographic hardness of distribution-specific learning · STOC 1993
Machine learning › Learning theory › distribution learning
distribution-specific learning
0.011993
Cryptographic hardness of distribution-specific learning · STOC 1993
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
cryptographic assumptions
0.011993
Cryptographic hardness of distribution-specific learning · STOC 1993
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
pseudorandom functions
0.011992
Cryptographic Lower Bounds for Learnability of Boolean Functions on the Uniform Distribution · COLT 1992
Computational complexity
learning theory
0.011991
When Won't Membership Queries Help? (Extended Abstract) · STOC 1991
Computational complexity › query complexity
membership queries
0.011991
When Won't Membership Queries Help? (Extended Abstract) · STOC 1991
Computational complexity
circuit complexity
0.011989
Lower Bounds for Pseudorandom Number Generators · FOCS 1989
Computational complexity
lower bounds
0.011989
Lower Bounds for Pseudorandom Number Generators · FOCS 1989
Computational complexity
pseudorandomness
0.011989
Lower Bounds for Pseudorandom Number Generators · FOCS 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cryptographic reduction · 0.0subset sum assumption · 0.0pseudorandom function generators · 0.0separation of complexity classes · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 When Won't Membership Queries Help?
abstract
We investigate cryptographic limitations on the power of membership queries to help with concept learning. We extend the notion of prediction-preserving reductions to prediction with membership queries. We exhibit a number of reductions and show several prediction problems to be complete for different complexity classes. We show that assuming the intractability of (1) quadratic residues module a composite, (2) inverting RSA encryption, or (3) factoring Blum integers, there is no polynomial time prediction algorithm with membership queries for Boolean formulas, constant depth threshold circuits, 3 μ-Boolean formulas, finite unions or intersections of DFAs, 2-way DFAs, NFAs, or CFGs. Also, we show that if there exist one-way functions that cannot be inverted by polynomial-sized circuits, then CNF or DNF formulas and convex polytopes intersected with the Boolean hypercube are either polynomial time predictable without membership queries, or they are not polynomial time predictable even with membership queries; so, in effect, membership queries will not help with predicting CNF or DNF formulas.
Dana Angluin, Michael Kharitonov
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.2
1995 Cryptographic Lower Bounds for Learnability of Boolean Functions on the Uniform Distribution
Michael Kharitonov
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.1
1993 Cryptographic hardness of distribution-specific learning
abstract
We investigate cryptographic lower bounds on the learn-
Michael Kharitonov
STOC1
1992 Cryptographic Lower Bounds for Learnability of Boolean Functions on the Uniform Distribution
abstract
We investigate cryptographic lower bounds on the number of samples and on computational resources required to learn several classes of boolean circuits on the uniform distribution. Under the assumption that solving n x n1+ε subset sum is hard, we construct (using the results of Impagliazzo and Naor [IN89] and Goldreich, Goldwasser, and Micali[GGM86] a pseudo-random function generator that can be computed by shallow boolean circuits. From this we conclude that learning AC1 circuits on the uniform distribution requires Ω(nlog log n) different samples, or, alternatively, that learning AC1 circuits on the uniform distribution with a polynomial number of samples is as hard as solving n x n1+ε subset sum. We also show that no algorithm can learn NC1 circuits on the uniform distribution with a polynomial number of samples. Using the weaker assumption that solving n x (1+ε)nsubset sum is hard, we show that the class of NC circuits can not be learned with nlogcn samples for any c.
Michael Kharitonov
COLT1
1991 When Won't Membership Queries Help? (Extended Abstract)
abstract
We investigate cryptographic limitations on the power of membership queries to help with concept learning.
Dana Angluin, Michael Kharitonov
STOC2
1989 Lower Bounds for Pseudorandom Number Generators
abstract
Computational resources necessary to generate pseudorandom strings are studied. In particular, lower bounds are proved for pseudorandom number generators, whereas previous research concentrated on upper bounds. The idea of separation of machine-based complexity classes on the basis of their ability (or inability) to generate pseudorandom strings is introduced and investigated.>
Michael Kharitonov, Andrew V. Goldberg, Moti Yung
FOCS1