Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthias Luber
dblp:19/5699
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 5 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 6 · 4 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Video understanding and tracking · 69% 3D vision · 21% Robot navigation and mapping · 10% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking
person tracking |
0.3 | 3 | 2011 | Better models for people tracking · ICRA 2011 People tracking with human motion predictions from social forces · ICRA 2010 Efficient people tracking in laser range data using a multi-hypothesis leg-tracker with adaptive occlusion probabilities · ICRA 2008 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Tracking people in 3D using a bottom-up top-down detector · ICRA 2011 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection
3d person detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Tracking people in 3D using a bottom-up top-down detector · ICRA 2011 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › multi-object tracking
data association |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Better models for people tracking · ICRA 2011 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
multi-object tracking |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Tracking people in 3D using a bottom-up top-down detector · ICRA 2011 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
human motion prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | People tracking with human motion predictions from social forces · ICRA 2010 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
localization |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Efficient people tracking in laser range data using a multi-hypothesis leg-tracker with adaptive occlusion probabilities · ICRA 2008 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › multi-object tracking
multiple hypothesis tracking |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Efficient people tracking in laser range data using a multi-hypothesis leg-tracker with adaptive occlusion probabilities · ICRA 2008 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking
occlusion handling |
0.1 | 2 | 2011 | Better models for people tracking · ICRA 2011 People tracking with human motion predictions from social forces · ICRA 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-hypothesis tracking · 0.4layered person model · 0.1boosted classifier · 0.1CLEAR MOT metrics · 0.1social force model · 0.1kalman filter · 0.1data association · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Socially-aware robot navigation: A learning approachabstractThe ability to act in a socially-aware way is a key skill for robots that share a space with humans. In this paper we address the problem of socially-aware navigation among people that meets objective criteria such as travel time or path length as well as subjective criteria such as social comfort. Opposed to model-based approaches typically taken in related work, we pose the problem as an unsupervised learning problem. We learn a set of dynamic motion prototypes from observations of relative motion behavior of humans found in publicly available surveillance data sets. The learned motion prototypes are then used to compute dynamic cost maps for path planning using an any-angle A* algorithm. In the evaluation we demonstrate that the learned behaviors are better in reproducing human relative motion in both criteria than a Proxemics-based baseline method. Matthias Luber, Luciano Spinello, Jens Silva, Kai Oliver Arras |
IROS | 1 |
| 2012 | Robot-specific social cues in emotional body languageabstractHumans use very sophisticated ways of bodily emotion expression combining facial expressions, sound, gestures and full body posture. Like others, we want to apply these aspects of human communication to ease the interaction between robots and users. In doing so we believe there is a need to consider what abstraction of human social communicative behaviors is appropriate for robots. The study reported in this paper is a pilot study to not offer simulated emotion but to offer an abstracted robot version of emotion expressions and an evaluation to what extent users interpret these robot expressions as the intended emotional states. To this end, we present the mobile, mildly humanized robot Daryl, for which we created six motion sequences that combine human-like, animal-like, and robot-specific social cues. The results of a user study (N=29) show that despite the absence of facial expressions and articulated extremities, subjects' interpretation of Daryl's emotional states were congruent with the abstracted emotion display. These results demonstrate that abstract displays of emotion that combine human-like, animal-like, and robot-specific modalities could in fact be an alternative to complex facial expressions and will feed into ongoing work identifying robot-specific social cues. Stephanie Embgen, Matthias Luber, Christian Becker-Asano, Marco Ragni, Vanessa Evers, Kai Oliver Arras |
RO-MAN | 2 |
| 2011 | Better models for people trackingabstractPeople tracking is a key component for robots operating in populated environments. Previous works have employed different filtering and data association techniques for this purpose that typically rely on a set of generic assumptions on target behavior and detector characteristics. In this paper, we focus on these assumptions rather than the tracking approach itself and show that with informed models, people tracking can be made substantially more accurate without compromising efficiency. Concretely, we present better, human-specific models for the occurrence of new tracks, false alarms, track occlusions, and track deletions. In the experiments with a large-scale outdoor data set collected with a laser range finder, the models and combinations thereof are experimentally compared using a multi-hypothesis baseline tracker and the CLEAR MOT metrics. The results show how some models selectively improve tracking performance at the expense of other measures. The final combination is then able to resolve the trade-offs, leading to a reduction of data association errors by more than a factor of two at the same cost. Matthias Luber, Gian Diego Tipaldi, Kai Oliver Arras |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2011 | Tracking people in 3D using a bottom-up top-down detectorabstractPeople detection and tracking is a key component for robots and autonomous vehicles in human environments. While prior work mainly employed image or 2D range data for this task, in this paper, we address the problem using 3D range data. In our approach, a top-down classifier selects hypotheses from a bottom-up detector, both based on sets of boosted features. The bottom-up detector learns a layered person model from a bank of specialized classifiers for different height levels of people that collectively vote into a continuous space. Modes in this space represent detection candidates that each postulate a segmentation hypothesis of the data. In the top-down step, the candidates are classified using features that are computed in voxels of a boosted volume tessellation. We learn the optimal volume tessellation as it enables the method to stably deal with sparsely sampled and articulated objects. We then combine the detector with tracking in 3D for which we take a multi-target multi-hypothesis tracking approach. The method neither needs a ground plane assumption nor relies on background learning. The results from experiments in populated urban environments demonstrate 3D tracking and highly robust people detection up to 20 m with equal error rates of at least 93%. Luciano Spinello, Matthias Luber, Kai Oliver Arras |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2011 | People tracking in RGB-D Data with on-line boosted target modelsabstractPeople tracking is a key component for robots that are deployed in populated environments. Previous works have used cameras and 2D and 3D range finders for this task. In this paper, we present a 3D people detection and tracking approach using RGB-D data. We combine a novel multi-cue person detector for RGB-D data with an on-line detector that learns individual target models. The two detectors are integrated into a decisional framework with a multi-hypothesis tracker that controls on-line learning through a track interpretation feedback. For on-line learning, we take a boosting approach using three types of RGB-D features and a confidence maximization search in 3D space. The approach is general in that it neither relies on background learning nor a ground plane assumption. For the evaluation, we collect data in a populated indoor environment using a setup of three Microsoft Kinect sensors with a joint field of view. The results demonstrate reliable 3D tracking of people in RGB-D data and show how the framework is able to avoid drift of the on-line detector and increase the overall tracking performance. Matthias Luber, Luciano Spinello, Kai Oliver Arras |
IROS | 1 |
| 2010 | People tracking with human motion predictions from social forcesabstractFor many tasks in populated environments, robots need to keep track of current and future motion states of people. Most approaches to people tracking make weak assumptions on human motion such as constant velocity or acceleration. But even over a short period, human behavior is more complex and influenced by factors such as the intended goal, other people, objects in the environment, and social rules. This motivates the use of more sophisticated motion models for people tracking especially since humans frequently undergo lengthy occlusion events. In this paper, we consider computational models developed in the cognitive and social science communities that describe individual and collective pedestrian dynamics for tasks such as crowd behavior analysis. In particular, we integrate a model based on a social force concept into a multi-hypothesis target tracker. We show how the refined motion predictions translate into more informed probability distributions over hypotheses and finally into a more robust tracking behavior and better occlusion handling. In experiments in indoor and outdoor environments with data from a laser range finder, the social force model leads to more accurate tracking with up to two times fewer data association errors. Matthias Luber, Johannes A. Stork, Gian Diego Tipaldi, Kai Oliver Arras |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2009 | Place-Dependent People Tracking
Matthias Luber, Gian Diego Tipaldi, Kai Oliver Arras |
ISRR | 1 |
| 2008 | Efficient people tracking in laser range data using a multi-hypothesis leg-tracker with adaptive occlusion probabilitiesabstractWe present an approach to laser-based people tracking using a multi-hypothesis tracker that detects and tracks legs separately with Kalman filters, constant velocity motion models, and a multi-hypothesis data association strategy. People are defined as high-level tracks consisting of two legs that are found with little model knowledge. We extend the data association so that it explicitly handles track occlusions in addition to detections and deletions. Additionally, we adapt the corresponding probabilities in a situation-dependent fashion so as to reflect the fact that legs frequently occlude each other. Experimental results carried out with a mobile robot illustrate that our approach can robustly and efficiently track multiple people even in situations of high levels of occlusion. Kai Oliver Arras, Slawomir Grzonka, Matthias Luber, Wolfram Burgard |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2005 | Successful Search and Rescue in Simulated Disaster Areas
Alexander Kleiner, Michael Brenner 0001, Tobias Bräuer, Christian Dornhege, Moritz Göbelbecker, Matthias Luber, Johann Prediger, Jörg Stückler, Bernhard Nebel |
RoboCup | 6 |