VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jun Tarui
dblp:19/6631
· DBLP profile ↗
31ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 28 · 7 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
6 papers |
Computational complexity · 56% Algorithms and data structures · 28% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 16% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity › pseudorandomness
k-wise independence |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | On the sample size of k-restricted min-wise independent permutations and other k-wise distributions · STOC 2003 |
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design › search structures › hashing
min-wise independent permutations |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | On the sample size of k-restricted min-wise independent permutations and other k-wise distributions · STOC 2003 |
Computational complexity
circuit complexity |
0.0 | 3 | 1996 | The Asymptotic Complexity of Merging Networks · J. ACM 1996 The Asymptotic Complexity of Merging Networks · FOCS 1992 On ACC · FOCS 1991 |
Computational complexity › pseudorandomness
limited independence |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | On permutations with limited independence · SODA 2000 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
permutation |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | On permutations with limited independence · SODA 2000 |
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › sorting › sorting networks
merging networks |
0.0 | 2 | 1996 | The Asymptotic Complexity of Merging Networks · J. ACM 1996 The Asymptotic Complexity of Merging Networks · FOCS 1992 |
Computational complexity
boolean function analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Learning DNF by Approximating Inclusion-Exclusion Formulae · CCC 1999 |
Computational complexity › learning theory › boolean function learning
DNF learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Learning DNF by Approximating Inclusion-Exclusion Formulae · CCC 1999 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
inclusion-exclusion |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Learning DNF by Approximating Inclusion-Exclusion Formulae · CCC 1999 |
Computational complexity
learning theory |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Learning DNF by Approximating Inclusion-Exclusion Formulae · CCC 1999 |
Algorithms and data structures
sorting and merging |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | The Asymptotic Complexity of Merging Networks · J. ACM 1996 |
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › sorting › sorting networks
comparator networks |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | The Asymptotic Complexity of Merging Networks · FOCS 1992 |
Computational complexity › circuit complexity
monotone circuits |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | The Asymptotic Complexity of Merging Networks · FOCS 1992 |
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › sorting
sorting networks |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | The Asymptotic Complexity of Merging Networks · FOCS 1992 |
Computational complexity
pseudorandomness |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | On permutations with limited independence · SODA 2000 |
Computational complexity › circuit complexity › constant-depth circuits
ACC^0 |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | On ACC · FOCS 1991 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › switching theory
switching networks |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | The Asymptotic Complexity of Merging Networks · J. ACM 1996 |
Computational complexity › circuit complexity › constant-depth circuits
depth-2 circuits |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | On ACC · FOCS 1991 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear algebra · 0.0combinatorial construction · 0.0lower bound proof · 0.0symmetric function approximation · 0.0naive search · 0.0comparator networks · 0.0asymptotic analysis · 0.0symmetric gates · 0.0probabilistic circuits · 0.0AND gates · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Space-Efficient Algorithms for Longest Increasing SubsequenceabstractGiven a sequence of integers, we want to find a longest increasing subsequence of the sequence. It is known that this problem can be solved in \(O\left (n \log n\right )\) time and space. Our goal in this paper is to reduce the space consumption while keeping the time complexity small. For \(\sqrt {n} \le s \le n\) , we present algorithms that use \(O\left (s \log n\right )\) bits and \(O\left (\frac {1}{s} \cdot n^{2} \cdot \log n\right )\) time for computing the length of a longest increasing subsequence, and \(O\left (\frac {1}{s} \cdot n^{2} \cdot \log ^{2} n\right )\) time for finding an actual subsequence. We also show that the time complexity of our algorithms is optimal up to polylogarithmic factors in the framework of sequential access algorithms with the prescribed amount of space. Masashi Kiyomi, Hirotaka Ono 0001, Yota Otachi, Pascal Schweitzer, Jun Tarui |
Theory Comput. Syst. | 5 |
| 2018 | Space-Efficient Algorithms for Longest Increasing Subsequence
Masashi Kiyomi, Hirotaka Ono 0001, Yota Otachi, Pascal Schweitzer, Jun Tarui |
STACS | 5 |
| 2014 | Depth-First Search Using O(n) Bits
Tetsuo Asano, Taisuke Izumi, Masashi Kiyomi, Matsuo Konagaya, Hirotaka Ono 0001, Yota Otachi, Pascal Schweitzer, Jun Tarui, Ryuhei Uehara |
ISAAC | 8 |
| 2013 | Theory and Applications of Models of Computation 2011
Mitsunori Ogihara, Jun Tarui |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 2 |
| 2011 | A well-mixed function with circuit complexity 5n: Tightness of the Lachish-Raz-type bounds
Kazuyuki Amano, Jun Tarui |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 2 |
| 2011 | Learning Boolean functions in AC0 on attribute and classification noise - Estimating an upper bound on attribute and classification noise
Akinobu Miyata, Jun Tarui, Etsuji Tomita |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 2 |
| 2010 | Smallest formulas for the parity of 2k variables are essentially unique
Jun Tarui |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 1 |
| 2009 | Negation-Limited Complexity of Parity and Inverters
Kazuo Iwama, Hiroki Morizumi, Jun Tarui |
Algorithmica | 3 |
| 2009 | Linear-size log-depth negation-limited inverter for k-tonic binary sequences
Hiroki Morizumi, Jun Tarui |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 2 |
| 2008 | Smallest Formulas for Parity of 2k
Jun Tarui |
COCOON | 1 |
| 2008 | A Well-Mixed Function with Circuit Complexity 5n±o(n): Tightness of the Lachish-Raz-Type Bounds
Kazuyuki Amano, Jun Tarui |
TAMC | 2 |
| 2008 | Reductions for monotone Boolean circuits
Kazuo Iwama, Hiroki Morizumi, Jun Tarui |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 3 |
| 2007 | Linear-Size Log-Depth Negation-Limited Inverter for k -Tonic Binary Sequences
Hiroki Morizumi, Jun Tarui |
TAMC | 2 |
| 2007 | Finding a Duplicate and a Missing Item in a Stream
Jun Tarui |
TAMC | 1 |
| 2006 | Negation-Limited Complexity of Parity and Inverters
Kazuo Iwama, Hiroki Morizumi, Jun Tarui |
ISAAC | 3 |
| 2004 | Learning Boolean Functions in AC0 on Attribute and Classification Noise
Akinobu Miyata, Jun Tarui, Etsuji Tomita |
ALT | 2 |
| 2003 | On the sample size of k-restricted min-wise independent permutations and other k-wise distributionsabstractAn explicit study of min-wise independent permutation families, together with their variants --- k-restricted, approximate, etc. --- was initiated by Broder, et al[4]. In this paper, we give a lower bound for the size of k-restricted min-wise independent permutation family. A family F of permutations on [0,n-1]=(0,1,...,n-1) is said to be k-restricted min-wise independent if for any subset X ⊆ [0,n-1] with |X| ≤ k and any x ∈ X, Pr[min(π(X))=π(x)] = 1/|X|, when π is randomly chosen from F according to a probability distribution D on the family F. For the minimum size of a family of k-restricted min-wise independent permutations, upper bounds of O(nk) for any fixed k have been shown for uniform and biased probability distributions on F. We show that if a family F of permutations on [0,n-1] is k-restricted min-wise independent, then |F| ≥ m(n-1,k-1), where m(n,d) = ∑i=0d/2(ni) if d is even; m(n,d)= ∑i=0(d-1)/2(ni) + (n-1(d-1)/2) otherwise. The lower bound for the size of F still holds when we allow an arbitrary probability distribution on F. Our proof technique is based on linear algebra methods, and can be regarded as a generalization of the result by Alon, Babai, and Itai[1], i.e., if random variables X1,X2,...,Xn: Ω → (0,1) are k-wise independent and Pr[Xi=1] = pi is neither 0 nor 1, then |Ω| ≥ m(n,k). By applying our proof technique, we also derive lower bounds for the sample size of the related notions, e.g., k-wise symmetrically independent distributions, k-rankwise independent permutation families, etc. Toshiya Itoh, Yoshinori Takei, Jun Tarui |
STOC | 3 |
| 2003 | On the negation-limited circuit complexity of merging
Kazuyuki Amano, Akira Maruoka, Jun Tarui |
Discret. Appl. Math. | 3 |
| 2000 | On permutations with limited independence
Toshiya Itoh, Yoshinori Takei, Jun Tarui |
SODA | 3 |
| 1999 | Finding Relevant Variables in PAC Model with Membership Queries
David Guijarro, Jun Tarui, Tatsuie Tsukiji |
ALT | 2 |
| 1999 | Learning DNF by Approximating Inclusion-Exclusion FormulaeabstractWe analyze upper and lower bounds on size of Boolean conjunctions necessary and sufficient to approximate a given DNF formula by accuracy slightly better than 1/2 (here we define the size of a Boolean conjunction as the number of distinct variables on which it depends). Such an analysis determines the performance of a naive search algorithm that exhausts Boolean conjunctions in the order of their sizes. In fact, our analysis does not depend on kinds of symmetric functions to be exhausted: instead of conjunctions, counting either disjunctions, parity functions, majority functions, or even general symmetric functions, derives the same learning results from similar analyses. Jun Tarui, Tatsuie Tsukiji |
CCC | 1 |
| 1999 | On the Negation-Limited Circuit Complexity of Merging
Kazuyuki Amano, Akira Maruoka, Jun Tarui |
COCOON | 3 |
| 1999 | Some Observations on the Computational Complexity of Graph Accessibility Problem
Jun Tarui, Seinosuke Toda |
COCOON | 1 |
| 1996 | The Asymptotic Complexity of Merging NetworksabstractLet M(m,n) be the minimum number of comparators needed in a comparator network that merges m elements x 1 ≤ x 2 ≤ … ≤ x m and n elements y 1 ≤ y 2 ≤ … ≤ y m , where n ≥ m. Batcher's odd-even merge yields the following upper bound: M(m,n) ≤ ½(m + n)log 2 m + O(n); in particular, M(n,n) ≤ n log 2 n + o(n) We prove the following lower bound that matches the upper bound above asymptotically as n ≥ m →∞; M(m,n) ≥ ½(m+n)log 2 m - O(m) in particular, M(n,n) ≥ n log 2 - O(n). Our proof technique extends to give similarily tight lower bounds for the size of monotone Boolean circuits for merging, and for the size of switching networks capable of realizing the set of permutations that arise from merging. Peter Bro Miltersen, Mike Paterson, Jun Tarui |
J. ACM | 3 |
| 1994 | On ACC
Richard Beigel, Jun Tarui |
Comput. Complex. | 2 |
| 1993 | Computing Symmetric Functions with AND/OR Circuits and a Single MAJORITY Gate
Zhi-Li Zhang, David A. Mix Barrington, Jun Tarui |
STACS | 3 |
| 1993 | Probablistic Polynomials, AC0 Functions, and the Polynomial-Time Hierarchy
Jun Tarui |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 1 |
| 1992 | The Asymptotic Complexity of Merging NetworksabstractLet M(m,n) be the minimum number of comparators needed in a comparator network that merges m elements x/sub 1/or=m. Batcher's odd-even merge yields the following upper bound: M(m,n)or=m to infinity :M(m,n)>or=/sup 1///sub 2/(m+n)log/sub 2/(m+1)-O(m); in particular, M(n,n)>or=nlog/sub 2/n-O(n). The authors' proof technique extends to give similarly tight lower bounds for the size of monotone Boolean circuits for merging, and for the size of switching networks capable of realizing the set of permutations that arise from merging.> Peter Bro Miltersen, Mike Paterson, Jun Tarui |
FOCS | 3 |
| 1992 | On Probabilistic ACC Circuits with an Exact-Threshold Output Gate
Richard Beigel, Jun Tarui, Seinosuke Toda |
ISAAC | 2 |
| 1991 | On ACCabstractIt has been shown by A. Yao (1990) that every language in ACC is recognized by a sequence of depth-2 probabilistic circuits with a symmetric gate at the root and n/sup polylog/(n) AND gates of fan-in polylog (n) at the leaves. The authors simplify Yao's proof and strengthen his results: every language in ACC is recognized by a sequence of depth-2 deterministic circuits with a symmetric gate at the root and n/sup polylog/(n) AND gates of fan-in polylog(n) at the leaves. They also analyze and improve modulus-amplifying polynomials constructed by S. Toda (1989) and Yao: this yields smaller circuits in Yao's and the present results on ACC.> Richard Beigel, Jun Tarui |
FOCS | 2 |
| 1991 | Randomized Polynomials, Threshold Circuits, and the Polynomial Hierarchy
Jun Tarui |
STACS | 1 |