Statically enforcing safe resource management is challenging due to tensions between flexible lifetime dis-ciplines and expressive sharing patterns. Region-based systems offer lexically scoped regions under a stack discipline, wherein resources are managed in bulk. In many such systems, however, resources are second-class and can neither escape their scope nor be freely returned from functions. Ownership and linear type systems, such as Rust, offer first-class, non-lexical lifetimes with robust static guarantees, but rely on invariants that limit higher-order patterns and expressive sharing. In this work, we propose a type system that uniformly treats all heap-allocated resources under diverse lifetime, granularity, and sharing settings. Our system provides programmers with three allocation modes: (1) fresh allocation for first-class, non-lexical resources; (2) fresh allocation for second-class resources with lexically bounded lifetimes; and (3) coallocation that groups resources by shadow arenas for bulk tracking and deallocation. Regardless of mode, resources are represented uniformly at the type level, supporting generic abstraction and preserving the higher-order parametric nature of the language. Obtaining static safety in higher-order languages with flexible sharing is nontrivial. To address this, our solution builds on reachability types, and our extension adds the capability to track both individual and grouped resources, enables the expression of cyclic store structures, and allows the selective enforcing of stack lifetime discipline. These mechanisms are formalized in the A < : ∗ and { A } < : ∗ type systems, which are proven type safe and memory safe in Rocq.

Managing stateful resources safely and expressively is a longstanding challenge in programming languages, especially in the presence of aliasing. For example, scope-based constructs like Java’s synchronized blocks offer ease of reasoning, but they restrict expressiveness and parallelism. Conversely, imperative, flow-sensitive approaches enable fine-grained control, but they require sophisticated typestate analyses and often burden programmers with explicit state tracking. In this work, we present a novel approach that unifies the ease of scoped reasoning with the expressiveness of imperative typestate management. Our design extends traditional flow-insensitive capability mechanisms to a flow-sensitive setting. In particular, we decouple capability lifetimes from lexical scopes, allowing functions to receive, revoke, or return capabilities in a flow-sensitive manner, building on existing mechanisms for the safety and ergonomics of scoped capability programming. We implement our approach as an extension to the Scala 3 compiler, leveraging path-dependent types and implicit resolution to enable concise, statically safe, and expressive typestate programming. Our prototype generically supports a wide range of patterns, including file operations, advanced locking protocols, DOM construction, and session types, showing that expressive and safe typestate management can be achieved with minimal extensions to an existing language with capability support.

Reasoning about programs in the presence of mutation and aliasing is notoriously difficult. Rust has popularized lifetime-based ownership tracking in systems programming, but its “shared XOR mutable” model is fundamentally at odds with higher-level functional programming. Reachability types offer an alternative: they enable safe sharing and escape of mutable data by tracking which resources each expression can reach. To track internal reachability within complex object graphs, reachability types adopt self-references that let components refer to enclosing resources from inside, just like this pointers in OO languages. While natural for declaratively typing escaping data, self-references complicate subtyping and furthermore type inference: variance restricts where self-references may appear, yet useful type conversions must allow them to vary in controlled ways, which in turn imposes constraints on inference. As an undesirable result, prior works require programmers to insert term-level coercions for even just avoidance —avoiding ill-scoped names in types. With all prior works being declarative, we investigate algorithmic reachability types in this work. We introduce a refined subtyping relation that permits more flexible usages of self-references. We further develop a sound and decidable bidirectional typing algorithm, implemented and verified in Lean. The algorithm automatically avoids ill-scoped names in types, and infers qualifiers via a lightweight unification mechanism. As a step towards practical reachability programming, we show that the system is capable of tracking diverse reachability patterns without explicit coercions in complex Church-encoded datatypes.

Local reasoning about programs that combine aliasing and mutable state is a longstanding challenge. Existing approaches – ownership systems, linear and affine types, uniqueness types, and lexical effect tracking – impose global restrictions such as uniqueness or linearity, or rely on shallow syntactic analyses. These designs fall short with higher-order functions and shared mutable state. Reachability Types (RT) track aliasing and separation in higher-order programs, ensuring runtime safety and non-interference. However, RT systems face three key limitations: (1) they prohibit cyclic references, ruling out non-terminating computations and fixed-point combinators; (2) they require deep tracking, where a qualifier must include all transitively reachable locations, reducing precision and hindering optimizations like fine-grained parallelism; and (3) referent qualifier invariance prevents referents from escaping their allocation contexts, making reference factories inexpressible. In this work, we address these limitations by extending RT with three mechanisms that enhance expressiveness. First, we introduce cyclic references, enabling recursive patterns to be encoded directly through the store. Second, we adopt shallow qualifier tracking, decoupling references from their transitively reachable values. Finally, we introduce an escaping rule with reference subtyping, allowing referent qualifiers to outlive their allocation context. These extensions are formalized in the F < : ∘ -calculus with a mechanized proof of type soundness, and case studies illustrate expressiveness through fixpoint combinators, non-interfering parallelism, and escaping read-only references.

Reachability types are a recent proposal to bring Rust-style reasoning about memory properties to higher-level languages, with a focus on higher-order functions, parametric types, and shared mutable state - features that are only partially supported by current techniques as employed in Rust. While prior work has established key type soundness results for reachability types using the usual syntactic techniques of progress and preservation, stronger metatheoretic properties have so far been unexplored. This paper presents an alternative semantic model of reachability types using logical relations, providing a framework in which we study key properties of interest: (1) semantic type soundness, including of not syntactically well-typed code fragments, (2) termination, especially in the presence of higher-order mutable references, (3) effect safety, especially the absence of observable mutation, and, finally, (4) program equivalence, especially reordering of non-interfering expressions for parallelization or compiler optimization.

We propose DDLoader, a system that embeds information about data partitioning and data distribution in distributed file systems using a metaprogramming framework. We demonstrate that this technique has practical benefits for building applications that interact with distributed file system applications. By using metaprogramming, we bring the traditional benefits of staging, such as partial evaluation to the domain of distributed file system access. Furthermore, this approach also fuses the data access code with the computation code, allowing end-to-end optimization. We test our framework on a real-world use case and show that this approach allows users to generate code that performs faster than traditional data loading by up to 12.56x on a single thread and even more when parallelized.

Datalog has gained prominence in program analysis due to its expressiveness and ease of use. Its generic fixpoint resolution algorithm over relational domains simplifies the expression of many complex analyses. The performance and scalability issues of early Datalog approaches have been addressed by tools such as Soufflé through specialized code generation. Still, while pure Datalog is expressive enough to support a wide range of analyses, there is a growing need for extensions to accommodate increasingly complex analyses This has led to the development of various extensions, such as Flix, Datafun, and Formulog, which enhance Datalog with features like arbitrary lattices and SMT constraints. Most of these extensions recognize the need for full interoperability between Datalog and a full-fledged programming language, a functionality that high-performance systems like Soufflé lack. Specifically, in most cases, they construct languages from scratch with first-class Datalog support, allowing greater flexibility. However, this flexibility often comes at the cost of performance due to the conflicting requirements of prioritizing modularity and abstraction over efficiency. Consequently, achieving both flexibility and compilation to highly-performant specialized code poses a significant challenge. In this work, we reconcile the competing demands of expressiveness and performance with Flan, a Datalog compiler fully embedded in Scala that leverages multi-stage programming to generate specialized code for enhanced performance. Our approach combines the flexibility of Flix with Soufflé’s performance, offering seamless integration with the host language that enables the addition of powerful extensions while generating specialized code for the entire computation. Flan’s simple operator interface allows the addition of an extensive set of features, including arbitrary aggregates, user-defined functions, and lattices, with multiple execution strategies such as binary and multi-way joins, supported by different indexing structures like specialized trees and hash tables, with minimal effort. We evaluate our system on a variety of benchmarks and compare it to established Datalog engines. Our results demonstrate competitive performance and speedups in the range of to compared to state-of-the-art systems for workloads of practical importance.

Fueled by the success of Rust, many programming languages are adding substructural features to their type systems. The promise of tracking properties such as lifetimes and sharing is tremendous, not just for low-level memory management, but also for controlling higher-level resources and capabilities. But so are the difficulties in adapting successful techniques from Rust to higher-level languages, where they need to interact with other advanced features, especially various flavors of functional and type-level abstraction. What would it take to bring full-fidelity reasoning about lifetimes and sharing to mainstream languages? Reachability types are a recent proposal that has shown promise in scaling to higher-order but monomorphic settings, tracking aliasing and separation on top of a substrate inspired by separation logic. However, naive extensions on top of the prior reachability type system λ * with type polymorphism and/or precise reachability polymorphism are unsound, making λ * unsuitable for adoption in real languages. Combining reachability and type polymorphism that is precise, sound, and parametric remains an open challenge. This paper presents a rethinking of the design of reachability tracking and proposes new polymorphic reachability type systems. We introduce a new freshness qualifier to indicate variables whose reachability sets may grow during evaluation steps. The new system tracks variables reachable in a single step and computes transitive closures only when necessary, thus preserving chains of reachability over known variables that can be refined using substitution. These ideas yield the simply-typed λ ◆ -calculus with precise lightweight, i.e. , quantifier-free, reachability polymorphism, and the F < : ◆ -calculus with bounded parametric polymorphism over types and reachability qualifiers, paving the way for making true tracking of lifetimes and sharing practical for mainstream languages. We prove type soundness and the preservation of separation property in Coq. We discuss various applications ( e.g. , safe capability programming), possible effect system extensions, and compare our system with Scala’s capture types.

Symbolic execution is a powerful program analysis and testing technique. Symbolic execution engines are usually implemented as interpreters, and the induced interpretation over-head can dramatically inhibit performance. Alternatively, implementation choices based on instrumentation provide a limited ability to transform programs. However, the use of compilation and code generation techniques beyond simple instrumentation remains underexplored for engine construction, leaving potential performance gains untapped. In this paper, we show how to tap some of these gains using sophisticated compilation techniques: We present Gensym, an optimizing symbolic-execution compiler that generates symbolic code which explores paths and generates tests in parallel. The key insight of GensYmis to compile symbolic execution tasks into cooperative concurrency via continuation-passing style, which further enables efficient parallelism. The design and implementation of Gensym is based on partial evaluation and generative programming techniques, which make it high-level and performant at the same time. We compare the performance of Gensym against the prior symbolic-execution compiler LLSC and the state-of-the-art symbolic interpreter KLEE. The results show an average 4.6× speedup for sequential execution and 9.4× speedup for parallel execution on 20 benchmark programs.

Graph-based intermediate representations (IRs) are widely used for powerful compiler optimizations, either interprocedurally in pure functional languages, or intraprocedurally in imperative languages. Yet so far, no suitable graph IR exists for aggressive global optimizations in languages with both effects and higher-order functions: aliasing and indirect control transfers make it difficult to maintain sufficiently granular dependency information for optimizations to be effective. To close this long-standing gap, we propose a novel typed graph IR combining a notion of reachability types with an expressive effect system to compute precise and granular effect dependencies at an affordable cost while supporting local reasoning and separate compilation. Our high-level graph IR imposes lexical structure to represent structured control flow and nesting, enabling aggressive and yet inexpensive code motion and other optimizations for impure higher-order programs. We formalize the new graph IR based on a λ-calculus with a reachability type-and-effect system along with a specification of various optimizations. We present performance case studies for tensor loop fusion, CUDA kernel fusion, symbolic execution of LLVM IR, and SQL query compilation in the Scala LMS compiler framework using the new graph IR. We observe significant speedups of up to 21 x .

Type systems usually characterize the shape of values but not their free variables. However, there are many desirable safety properties one could guarantee if one could track how references can escape. For example, one may implement algebraic effect handlers using capabilities -- a value which permits one to perform the effect -- safely if one can guarantee that the capability itself does not escape the scope bound by the effect handler. To this end, we study the $\textrm{CF}_{

Incrementalization of queries is imperative in cases where data arrives as streams and output is latency-critical and/or desired before the full data has been received. Incremental execution computes the output at a given time by reusing the previously computed outputs or maintained views rather than re-evaluating the query from scratch. There are various approaches to perform this incrementalization ranging from query-specific algorithms and data structures (e.g., DYN, AJU) to general systems (e.g., DBToaster, Materialize).

Cryptographic techniques have the potential to enable distrusting parties to collaborate in fundamentally new ways, but their practical implementation poses numerous challenges. An important class of such cryptographic techniques is known as Secure Multi-Party Computation (MPC). Developing Secure MPC applications in realistic scenarios requires extensive knowledge spanning multiple areas of cryptography and systems. And while the steps to arrive at a solution for a particular application are often straightforward, it remains difficult to make the implementation efficient, and tedious to apply those same steps to a slightly different application from scratch. Hence, it is an important problem to design platforms for implementing Secure MPC applications with minimum effort and using techniques accessible to non-experts in cryptography.

On-stack replacement (OSR) describes the ability to replace currently executing code with a different version, either a more optimized one (tiered execution) or a more general one (deoptimization to undo speculative optimization). While OSR is a key component in all modern VMs for languages like Java or JavaScript, OSR has only recently been studied as a more abstract program transformation, independent of language VMs. Still, previous work has only considered OSR in the context of low-level execution models based on stack frames, labels, and jumps.

We present LLSC, a prototype compiler for nondeterministic parallel symbolic execution of the LLVM intermediate representation (IR). Given an LLVM IR program, LLSC generates code preserving the symbolic execution semantics and orchestrating solver invocations. The generated code runs efficiently, since the code has eliminated the interpretation overhead and explores multiple paths in parallel. To the best of our knowledge, LLSC is the first compiler for fork-based symbolic execution semantics that can generate parallel execution code.

Ownership type systems, based on the idea of enforcing unique access paths, have been primarily focused on objects and top-level classes. However, existing models do not as readily reflect the finer aspects of nested lexical scopes, capturing, or escaping closures in higher-order functional programming patterns, which are increasingly adopted even in mainstream object-oriented languages. We present a new type system, λ * , which enables expressive ownership-style reasoning across higher-order functions. It tracks sharing and separation through reachability sets, and layers additional mechanisms for selectively enforcing uniqueness on top of it. Based on reachability sets, we extend the type system with an expressive flow-sensitive effect system, which enables flavors of move semantics and ownership transfer. In addition, we present several case studies and extensions, including applications to capabilities for algebraic effects, one-shot continuations, and safe parallelization.

Modern location-based applications rely extensively on the efficient processing of spatial data and queries. Spatial query engines are commonly engineered as an extension to a relational database or a cluster-computing framework. Large parts of the spatial processing runtime is spent on evaluating spatial predicates and traversing spatial indexing structures. Typical high-level implementations of these spatial structures incur significant interpretive overhead, which increases latency and lowers throughput. A promising idea to improve the performance of spatial workloads is to leverage native code generation techniques that have become popular in relational query engines. However, architecting a spatial query compiler is challenging since spatial processing has fundamentally different execution characteristics from relational workloads in terms of data dimensionality, indexing structures, and predicate evaluation. In this paper, we discuss the underlying reasons why standard query compilation techniques are not fully effective when applied to spatial workloads, and we demonstrate how a particular style of query compilation based on techniques borrowed from partial evaluation and generative programming manages to avoid most of these difficulties by extending the scope of custom code generation into the data structures layer. We extend the LB2 main-memory query compiler, a relational engine developed in this style, with spatial data types, predicates, indexing structures, and operators. We show that the spatial extension matches the performance of specialized library code and outperforms relational and map-reduce extensions.

Building effective symbolic execution engines poses challenges in multiple dimensions: an engine must correctly model the program semantics, provide flexibility in symbolic execution strategies, and execute them efficiently. This paper proposes a principled approach to building correct, flexible, and efficient symbolic execution engines, directly rooted in the semantics of the underlying language in terms of a high-level definitional interpreter. The definitional interpreter induces algebraic effects to abstract over semantic variants of symbolic execution, e.g., collecting path conditions as a state effect and path exploration as a nondeterminism effect. Different handlers of these effects give rise to different symbolic execution strategies, making execution strategies orthogonal to the symbolic execution semantics, thus improving flexibility. Furthermore, by annotating the symbolic definitional interpreter with binding-times and specializing it to the input program via the first Futamura projection, we obtain a "symbolic compiler", generating efficient instrumented code having the symbolic execution semantics. Our work reconciles the interpretation- and instrumentation-based approaches to building symbolic execution engines in a uniform framework. We illustrate our approach on a simple imperative language step-by-step and then scale up to a significant subset of LLVM IR. We also show effect handlers for common path selection strategies. Evaluating our prototype's performance shows speedups of 10~30x over the unstaged counterpart, and ~2x over KLEE, a state-of-the-art symbolic interpreter for LLVM IR.

Parallel training can speed up the convergence of machine learning models via splitting the workload into multiple accelerators by the wide array of possible parallel paradigms (e.g., data parallelism, model parallelism, attribute parallelism, and pipelining parallelism). However, most machine learning frameworks lack sufficient support for these flexible and sometimes complex parallel training schemes (e.g., TensorFlow does not provide convenient APIs for any paradigm other than data parallelism), and the engineering effort to support all parallelisms in all machine learning frameworks seems gigantic. In this paper, we demonstrate that most parallel training designs/paradigms can be abstracted as a computation graph transformation problem, so that they are realized via computation graph duplication, splitting, augmentation, and assignment to different accelerators, which are then connected by send/recv channels for tensor communications. Furthermore, conducting such computation graph transformations in a por table I R allows the engineering efforts of parallel training to be widely applied across machine learning frameworks. We propose an extensible parallel training search space which describes parallel training schemes in a declarative fashion. We then implement a computation graph transformation compiler that can instantiate the parallel schemes into explicit execution plans, which are readily executable on modern machine learning frameworks (such as TensorFlow). We maximize code reuse by handling parallel configurations and computation graph transformations in extended ONNX, which can be ported to machine learning frameworks by adapting their existing ONNX frontend/backend implementations. Our design reflects a few good themes in machine learning frameworks, including code reuse via powerful IR (as in MLIR) and separation of declaration and realization (as in Halide/TVM).

We propose a novel approach for compiling MATLAB and similar languages that are characterized by tensors with dynamic shapes and types. We stage an evaluator for a subset of MATLAB using the Lightweight Modular Staging (LMS) framework to produce a compiler that generates C code. But the first Futamura projection alone does not lead to efficient code: we need to refine the rigid stage distinction based on type and shape inference to remove costly runtime checks.

Abstract We present the design and implementation of a SQL query processor that outperforms existing database systems and is written in just about 500 lines of Scala code – a convincing case study that high-level functional programming can handily beat C for systems-level programming where the last drop of performance matters. The key enabler is a shift in perspective toward generative programming. The core of the query engine is an interpreter for relational-algebra operations, written in Scala. Using the open-source lightweight modular staging framework, we turn this interpreter into a query compiler with very low effort. To do so, we capitalize on an old and widely known result from partial evaluation: the first Futamura projection, which states that a process that can specialize an interpreter to any given input program is equivalent to a compiler. In this context, we discuss lightweight modular staging programming patterns such as mixed-stage data structures (e.g., data records with static schema and dynamic field components) and techniques to generate low-level C code, including specialized data structures and data loading primitives.

What makes a good compiler IR? In the context of functional languages, there has been an extensive debate on the advantages and disadvantages of continuation-passing-style (CPS). The consensus seems to be that some form of explicit continuations is necessary to model jumps in a functional style, but that they should have a 2nd-class status, separate from regular functions, to ensure efficient code generation. Building on this observation, a recent study from PLDI 2017 proposed a direct-style IR with explicit join points, which essentially represent local continuations, i.e., functions that do not return or escape. While this IR can work well in practice, as evidenced by the implementation of join points in the Glasgow Haskell Compiler (GHC), there still seems to be room for improvement, especially with regard to the way continuations are handled in the course of optimization. In this paper, we contribute to the CPS debate by developing a novel IR with the following features. First, we integrate a control operator that resembles Felleisen’s C , eliminating certain redundant rewrites observed in the previous study. Second, we treat the non-returning and non-escaping aspects of continuations separately, allowing efficient compilation of well-behaved functions defined by the user. Third, we define a selective CPS translation of our IR, which erases control operators while preserving the meaning and typing of programs. These features enable optimizations in both direct style and full CPS, as well as in any intermediate style with selectively exposed continuations. Thus, we change the spectrum of available options from “CPS yes or no” to “as much or as little CPS as you want, when you want it”.

Despite decades of progress, static analysis tools still have great difficulty dealing with programs that combine arithmetic, loops, dynamic memory allocation, and linked data structures. In this paper we draw attention to two fundamental reasons for this difficulty: First, typical underlying program abstractions are low-level and inherently scalar, characterizing compound entities like data structures or results computed through iteration only indirectly. Second, to ensure termination, analyses typically project away the dimension of time, and merge information per program point, which incurs a loss in precision. As a remedy, we propose to make collective operations first-class in program analysis – inspired by Σ-notation in mathematics, and also by the success of high-level intermediate languages based on @map/reduce@ operations in program generators and aggressive optimizing compilers for domain-specific languages (DSLs). We further propose a novel structured heap abstraction that preserves a symbolic dimension of time, reflecting the program’s loop structure and thus unambiguously correlating multiple temporal points in the dynamic execution with a single point in the program text. This paper presents a formal model, based on a high-level intermediate analysis language, a practical realization in a prototype tool that analyzes C code, and an experimental evaluation that demonstrates competitive results on a series of benchmarks. Remarkably, our implementation achieves these results in a fully semantics-preserving strongest-postcondition model, which is a worst-case for analysis/verification. The underlying ideas, however, are not tied to this model and would equally apply in other settings, e.g., demand-driven invariant inference in a weakest-precondition model. Given its semantics-preserving nature, our implementation is not limited to analysis for verification, but can also check program equivalence, and translate legacy C code to high-performance DSLs.

Deep learning has seen tremendous success over the past decade in computer vision, machine translation, and gameplay. This success rests crucially on gradient-descent optimization and the ability to “learn” parameters of a neural network by backpropagating observed errors. However, neural network architectures are growing increasingly sophisticated and diverse, which motivates an emerging quest for even more general forms of differentiable programming, where arbitrary parameterized computations can be trained by gradient descent. In this paper, we take a fresh look at automatic differentiation (AD) techniques, and especially aim to demystify the reverse-mode form of AD that generalizes backpropagation in neural networks. We uncover a tight connection between reverse-mode AD and delimited continuations, which permits implementing reverse-mode AD purely via operator overloading and without managing any auxiliary data structures. We further show how this formulation of AD can be fruitfully combined with multi-stage programming (staging), leading to an efficient implementation that combines the performance benefits of deep learning frameworks based on explicit reified computation graphs (e.g., TensorFlow) with the expressiveness of pure library approaches (e.g., PyTorch).

It is well known that a staged interpreter is a compiler: specializing an interpreter to a given program produces an equivalent executable that runs faster. This connection is known as the first Futamura projection. It is even more widely known that an abstract interpreter is a program analyzer: tweaking an interpreter to run on abstract domains produces a sound static analysis. What happens when we combine these two ideas, and apply specialization to an abstract interpreter? In this paper, we present a unifying framework that naturally extends the first Futamura projection from concrete interpreters to abstract interpreters. Our approach derives a sound staged abstract interpreter based on a generic interpreter with type-level binding-time abstractions and monadic abstractions. By using different instantiations of these abstractions, the generic interpreter can flexibly behave in one of four modes: as an unstaged concrete interpreter, a staged concrete interpreter, an unstaged abstract interpreter, or a staged abstract interpreter. As an example of abstraction without regret, the overhead of these abstraction layers is eliminated in the generated code after staging. We show that staging abstract interpreters is practical and useful to optimize static analysis, all while requiring less engineering effort and without compromising soundness. We conduct three case studies, including a comparison with Boucher and Feeley’s abstract compilation, applications to various control-flow analyses, and a demonstration for modular analysis. We also empirically evaluate the effect of staging on the execution time. The experiment shows an order of magnitude speedup with staging for control-flow analyses.

Running machine learning (ML) workloads at scale is as much a data management problem as a model engineering problem. Big performance challenges exist when data management systems invoke ML classifiers as user-defined functions (UDFs) or when stand-alone ML frameworks interact with data stores for data loading and pre-processing (ETL). In particular, UDFs can be precompiled or simply a black box for the data management system and the data layout may be completely different from the native layout, thus adding overheads at the boundaries. In this demo, we will show how bottlenecks between existing systems can be eliminated when their engines are designed around runtime compilation and native code generation, which is the case for many state-of-the-art relational engines as well as ML frameworks. We demonstrate an integration of Flare (an accelerator for Spark SQL), and Lantern (an accelerator for TensorFlow and PyTorch) that results in a highly optimized end-to-end compiled data path, switching between SQL and ML processing with negligible overhead.

Managed language runtimes such as the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) provide adequate performance for a wide range of applications, but at the same time, they lack much of the low-level control that performance-minded programmers appreciate in languages like C/C++ . One important example is the intrinsics interface that exposes instructions of SIMD (Single Instruction Multiple Data) vector ISAs (Instruction Set Architectures). In this paper we present an automatic approach for including native intrinsics in the runtime of a managed language. Our implementation consists of two parts. First, for each vector ISA, we automatically generate the intrinsics API from the vendor-provided XML specification. Second, we employ a metaprogramming approach that enables programmers to generate and load native code at runtime. In this setting, programmers can use the entire high-level language as a kind of macro system to define new high-level vector APIs with zero overhead. As an example use case we show a variable precision API. We provide an end-to-end implementation of our approach in the HotSpot VM that supports all 5912 Intel SIMD intrinsics from MMX to AVX-512 . Our benchmarks demonstrate that this combination of SIMD and metaprogramming enables developers to write high-performance, vectorized code on an unmodified JVM that outperforms the auto-vectorizing HotSpot just-in-time (JIT) compiler and provides tight integration between vectorized native code and the managed JVM ecosystem.

Training of deep learning models depends on gradient descent and end-to-end differentiation. Under the slogan of differentiable programming, there is an increasing demand for efficient automatic gradient computation for emerging network architectures that incorporate dynamic control flow, especially in NLP. In this paper we propose an implementation of backpropagation using functions with callbacks, where the forward pass is executed as a sequence of function calls, and the backward pass as a corresponding sequence of function returns. A key realization is that this technique of chaining callbacks is well known in the programming languages community as continuation-passing style (CPS). Any program can be converted to this form using standard techniques, and hence, any program can be mechanically converted to compute gradients. Our approach achieves the same flexibility as other reverse-mode automatic differentiation (AD) techniques, but it can be implemented without any auxiliary data structures besides the function call stack, and it can easily be combined with graph construction and native code generation techniques through forms of multi-stage programming, leading to a highly efficient implementation that combines the performance benefits of define-then-run software frameworks such as TensorFlow with the expressiveness of define-by-run frameworks such as PyTorch.

To leverage modern hardware platforms to their fullest, more and more database systems embrace compilation of query plans to native code. In the research community, there is an ongoing debate about the best way to architect such query compilers. This is perceived to be a difficult task, requiring techniques fundamentally different from traditional interpreted query execution.

Given a tower of interpreters, i.e., a sequence of multiple interpreters interpreting one another as input programs, we aim to collapse this tower into a compiler that removes all interpretive overhead and runs in a single pass. In the real world, a use case might be Python code executed by an x86 runtime, on a CPU emulated in a JavaScript VM, running on an ARM CPU. Collapsing such a tower can not only exponentially improve runtime performance, but also enable the use of base-language tools for interpreted programs, e.g., for analysis and verification. In this paper, we lay the foundations in an idealized but realistic setting. We present a multi-level lambda calculus that features staging constructs and stage polymorphism: based on runtime parameters, an evaluator either executes source code (thereby acting as an interpreter) or generates code (thereby acting as a compiler). We identify stage polymorphism, a programming model from the domain of high-performance program generators, as the key mechanism to make such interpreters compose in a collapsible way. We present Pink, a meta-circular Lisp-like evaluator on top of this calculus, and demonstrate that we can collapse arbitrarily many levels of self-interpretation, including levels with semantic modifications. We discuss several examples: compiling regular expressions through an interpreter to base code, building program transformers from modi ed interpreters, and others. We develop these ideas further to include reflection and reification, culminating in Purple, a reflective language inspired by Brown, Blond, and Black, which realizes a conceptually infinite tower, where every aspect of the semantics can change dynamically. Addressing an open challenge, we show how user programs can be compiled and recompiled under user-modified semantics.

Abstracting abstract machines is a systematic methodology for constructing sound static analyses for higher-order languages, by deriving small-step abstract abstract machines (AAMs) that perform abstract interpretation from abstract machines that perform concrete evaluation. Darais et al. apply the same underlying idea to monadic definitional interpreters, and obtain monadic abstract definitional interpreters (ADIs) that perform abstract interpretation in big-step style using monads. Yet, the relation between small-step abstract abstract machines and big-step abstract definitional interpreters is not well studied. In this paper, we explain their functional correspondence and demonstrate how to systematically transform small-step abstract abstract machines into big-step abstract definitional interpreters. Building on known semantic interderivation techniques from the concrete evaluation setting, the transformations include linearization, lightweight fusion, disentanglement, refunctionalization, and the left inverse of the CPS transform. Linearization expresses nondeterministic choice through first-order data types, after which refunctionalization transforms the first-order data types that represent continuations into higher-order functions. The refunctionalized AAM is an abstract interpreter written in continuation-passing style (CPS) with two layers of continuations, which can be converted back to direct style with delimited control operators. Based on the known correspondence between delimited control and monads, we demonstrate that the explicit use of monads in abstract definitional interpreters is optional. All transformations properly handle the collecting semantics and nondeterminism of abstract interpretation. Remarkably, we reveal how precise call/return matching in control-flow analysis can be obtained by refunctionalizing a small-step abstract abstract machine with proper caching.

The Dependent Object Types (DOT) family of calculi has been proposed as a new theoretic foundation for Scala and similar languages, unifying functional programming, object oriented programming and ML-style module systems. Following the recent type soundness proof for DOT, the present paper aims to establish stronger meta-theoretic properties. The main result is a fully mechanized proof of strong normalization for D_<:, a variant of DOT that excludes recursive functions and recursive types. We further discuss techniques and challenges for adding recursive types while maintaining strong normalization, and demonstrate that certain variants of recursive self types can be integrated successfully.

Metaprogramming is among the most promising candidates to solve the abstraction vs performance trade-off that plagues software engineering through specialization. Metaprogramming has been used to enable low-overhead generic programming for a long time, with C++ templates being one of the most prominent examples. But often a single, fixed pattern of specialization is not enough, and more flexibility is needed. Hence, this paper seeks to apply generic programming techniques to challenges in metaprogramming, in particular to abstract over the execution stage of individual program expressions. We thus extend the scope of generic programming into the dimension of time. The resulting notion of stage polymorphism enables novel abstractions in the design of program generators, which we develop and explore in this paper. We present one possible implementation, in Scala using the lightweight modular staging (LMS) framework, and apply it to two important case studies: convolution on images and the fast Fourier transform (FFT).

Symbolic parallelism is a fresh look at the decade-old problem of turning sequential, imperative, code into associative reduction kernels, based on the realization that map/reduce is at its core a staging problem: how can programs be separated so that part of the computation can be done before loop-carried dependencies become available? Previous work has investigated dynamic approaches that build symbolic summaries while the actual data is processed. In this short paper, we approach the problem from the static side, and show that with simple syntax- or type-driven transformations, we can readily transform large classes of imperative groupby-aggregate programs into map/reduce parallelism with deterministic overhead.

While type soundness proofs are taught in every graduate PL class, the gap between realistic languages and what is accessible to formal proofs is large. In the case of Scala, it has been shown that its formal model, the Dependent Object Types (DOT) calculus, cannot simultaneously support key metatheoretic properties such as environment narrowing and subtyping transitivity, which are usually required for a type soundness proof. Moreover, Scala and many other realistic languages lack a general substitution property.

Performance critical software is almost always developed in C, as programmers do not trust high-level languages to deliver the same reliable performance. This is bad because low-level code in unsafe languages attracts security vulnerabilities and because development is far less productive, with PL advances mostly lost on programmers operating under tight performance constraints. High-level languages provide memory safety out of the box, but they are deemed too slow and unpredictable for serious system software.

High performance in modern computing platforms requires programs to be parallel, distributed, and run on heterogeneous hardware. However programming such architectures is extremely difficult due to the need to implement the application using multiple programming models and combine them together in ad-hoc ways. To optimize distributed applications both for modern hardware and for modern programmers we need a programming model that is sufficiently expressive to support a variety of parallel applications, sufficiently performant to surpass hand-optimized sequential implementations, and sufficiently portable to support a variety of heterogeneous hardware. Unfortunately existing systems tend to fall short of these requirements. In this paper we introduce the Distributed Multiloop Language (DMLL), a new intermediate language based on common parallel patterns that captures the necessary semantic knowledge to efficiently target distributed heterogeneous architectures. We show straightforward analyses that determine what data to distribute based on its usage as well as powerful transformations of nested patterns that restructure computation to enable distribution and optimize for heterogeneous devices. We present experimental results for a range of applications spanning multiple domains and demonstrate highly efficient execution compared to manually-optimized counterparts in multiple distributed programming models.

Today's 'Big' spatial computing and analytics are largely processed in-memory. Still, evaluation in prominent spatial query engines is neither fully optimized for modern-class platforms nor taking full advantage of compilation (i.e., generating low-level query code). Query compilation has been rapidly rising inside in-memory relational database management systems (RDBMSs) achieving remarkable speedups; how can we bring similar benefits to spatial query engines?

Recent years have seen a surge of interest in staging and generative programming, driven by the increasing difficulty of making high-level code run fast on modern hardware. While the mechanics of program generation are relatively well understood, we have only begun to understand how to develop systems in a generative way. The Lightweight Modular Staging (LMS) platform forms the core of a research agenda to make generative programming more widely accessible, through powerful libraries and a growing selection of case studies that illuminate design patterns and crystallize best practices for high-level and effective generative programming. This talk will reflect on the foundations of LMS, on applications, achievements, challenges, as well as ongoing and future work.

First-class functions dramatically increase expressiveness, at the expense of static guarantees. In ALGOL or PASCAL, functions could be passed as arguments but never escape their defining scope. Therefore, function arguments could serve as temporary access tokens or capabilities, enabling callees to perform some action, but only for the duration of the call. In modern languages, such programming patterns are no longer available.

Scala’s type system unifies aspects of ML modules, object- oriented, and functional programming. The Dependent Object Types (DOT) family of calculi has been proposed as a new theoretic foundation for Scala and similar expressive languages. Unfortunately, type soundness has only been established for restricted subsets of DOT. In fact, it has been shown that important Scala features such as type refinement or a subtyping relation with lattice structure break at least one key metatheoretic property such as environment narrowing or invertible subtyping transitivity, which are usually required for a type soundness proof. The main contribution of this paper is to demonstrate how, perhaps surprisingly, even though these properties are lost in their full generality, a rich DOT calculus that includes recursive type refinement and a subtyping lattice with intersection types can still be proved sound. The key insight is that subtyping transitivity only needs to be invertible in code paths executed at runtime, with contexts consisting entirely of valid runtime objects, whereas inconsistent subtyping contexts can be permitted for code that is never executed.

We present the design and implementation of a SQL query processor that outperforms existing database systems and is written in just about 500 lines of Scala code -- a convincing case study that high-level functional programming can handily beat C for systems-level programming where the last drop of performance matters. The key enabler is a shift in perspective towards generative programming. The core of the query engine is an interpreter for relational algebra operations, written in Scala. Using the open-source LMS Framework (Lightweight Modular Staging), we turn this interpreter into a query compiler with very low effort. To do so, we capitalize on an old and widely known result from partial evaluation known as Futamura projections, which state that a program that can specialize an interpreter to any given input program is equivalent to a compiler. In this pearl, we discuss LMS programming patterns such as mixed-stage data structures (e.g. data records with static schema and dynamic field components) and techniques to generate low-level C code, including specialized data structures and data loading primitives.

State-of-the-art immutable collections have wildly differing performance characteristics across their operations, often forcing programmers to choose different collection implementations for each task. Thus, changes to the program can invalidate the choice of collections, making code evolution costly. It would be desirable to have a collection that performs well for a broad range of operations. To this end, we present the RRB-Vector, an immutable sequence collection that offers good performance across a large number of sequential and parallel operations. The underlying innovations are: (1) the Relaxed-Radix-Balanced (RRB) tree structure, which allows efficient structural reorganization, and (2) an optimization that exploits spatio-temporal locality on the RRB data structure in order to offset the cost of traversing the tree. In our benchmarks, the RRB-Vector speedup for parallel operations is lower bounded by 7x when executing on 4 CPUs of 8 cores each. The performance for discrete operations, such as appending on either end, or updating and removing elements, is consistently good and compares favorably to the most important immutable sequence collections in the literature and in use today. The memory footprint of RRB-Vector is on par with arrays and an order of magnitude less than competing collections.

Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) are very versatile devices, but their complicated programming model has stymied their widespread usage. While modern High-Level Synthesis (HLS) tools provide better programming models, the interface they offer is still too low-level. In order to produce good quality hardware designs with these tools, the users are forced to manually perform optimizations that demand detailed knowledge of both the application and the implementation platform. Additionally, many HLS tools only generate isolated hardware modules that the user still needs to integrate into a system design before generating the FPGA bitstream. These problems make HLS tools difficult to use for application developers who have little hardware design knowledge. To address these problems, we propose an automated methodology to generate FPGA bitstreams from high-level programs written in Domain-Specific Languages (DSLs). We leverage the domain-knowledge conveyed by the DSL and its domain-specific semantics to extract application parallelism, perform optimizations and also identify a suitable system-architecture for the implementation, thereby, relieving the user from most of the hardware-level details. We demonstrate the high productivity and high design quality this approach offers by automatically generating hardware systems from applications written in OptiML, a machine-learning DSL. To evaluate our methodology, we use four OptiML applications and show that we can easily generate different solutions which achieve different trade-offs between performance and area. More importantly, the results reveal that our generated hardware achieves much better performance compared to the one obtained from using the HLS tool without platform-specific optimizations.

Recent work has explored using higher level languages to improve programmer productivity on GPUs. These languages often utilize high level computation patterns (e.g., Map and Reduce) that encode parallel semantics to enable automatic compilation to GPU kernels. However, the problem of efficiently mapping patterns to GPU hardware becomes significantly more difficult when the patterns are nested, which is common in non-trivial applications. To address this issue, we present a general analysis framework for automatically and efficiently mapping nested patterns onto GPUs. The analysis maps nested patterns onto a logical multidimensional domain and parameterizes the block size and degree of parallelism in each dimension. We then add GPU-specific hard and soft constraints to prune the space of possible mappings and select the best mapping. We also perform multiple compiler optimizations that are guided by the mapping to avoid dynamic memory allocations and automatically utilize shared memory within GPU kernels. We compare the performance of our automatically selected mappings to hand-optimized implementations on multiple benchmarks and show that the average performance gap on 7 out of 8 benchmarks is 24%. Furthermore, our mapping strategy outperforms simple 1D mappings and existing 2D mappings by up to 28.6x and 9.6x respectively.

A scalable programming language is one in which the same concepts can describe small as well as large parts. Towards this goal, Scala unifies concepts from object and module systems. An essential ingredient of this unification is the concept of objects with type members, which can be referenced through path-dependent types. Unfortunately, path-dependent types are not well-understood, and have been a roadblock in grounding the Scala type system on firm theory.

Parsers are ubiquitous in computing, and many applications depend on their performance for decoding data efficiently. Parser combinators are an intuitive tool for writing parsers: tight integration with the host language enables grammar specifications to be interleaved with processing of parse results. Unfortunately, parser combinators are typically slow due to the high overhead of the host language abstraction mechanisms that enable composition.

Just-in-time (JIT) compilation of running programs provides more optimization opportunities than offline compilation. Modern JIT compilers, such as those in virtual machines like Oracle's HotSpot for Java or Google's V8 for JavaScript, rely on dynamic profiling as their key mechanism to guide optimizations. While these JIT compilers offer good average performance, their behavior is a black box and the achieved performance is highly unpredictable.

In this paper we advocate that it is time for a radical rethinking of database systems design. Developers should be able to leverage high-level programming languages without having to pay a price in efficiency. To realize our vision of abstraction without regret , we present LegoBase, a query engine written in the high-level programming language Scala. The key technique to regain efficiency is to apply generative programming: the Scala code that constitutes the query engine, despite its high-level appearance, is actually a program generator that emits specialized, low-level C code. We show how the combination of high-level and generative programming allows to easily implement a wide spectrum of optimizations that are difficult to achieve with existing low-level query compilers, and how it can continuously optimize the query engine. We evaluate our approach with the TPC-H benchmark and show that: (a) with all optimizations enabled, our architecture significantly outperforms a commercial in-memory database system as well as an existing query compiler, (b) these performance improvements require programming just a few hundred lines of high-level code instead of complicated low-level code that is required by existing query compilers and, finally, that (c) the compilation overhead is low compared to the overall execution time, thus making our approach usable in practice for efficiently compiling query engines.

This is in response to recent feedback from our peers that calls for a number of clarifications regarding the experimental section of our paper.

Developing high-performance software is a difficult task that requires the use of low-level, architecture-specific programming models (e.g., OpenMP for CMPs, CUDA for GPUs, MPI for clusters). It is typically not possible to write a single application that can run efficiently in different environments, leading to multiple versions and increased complexity. Domain-Specific Languages (DSLs) are a promising avenue to enable programmers to use high-level abstractions and still achieve good performance on a variety of hardware. This is possible because DSLs have higher-level semantics and restrictions than general-purpose languages, so DSL compilers can perform higher-level optimization and translation. However, the cost of developing performance-oriented DSLs is a substantial roadblock to their development and adoption. In this article, we present an overview of the Delite compiler framework and the DSLs that have been developed with it. Delite simplifies the process of DSL development by providing common components, like parallel patterns, optimizations, and code generators, that can be reused in DSL implementations. Delite DSLs are embedded in Scala, a general-purpose programming language, but use metaprogramming to construct an Intermediate Representation (IR) of user programs and compile to multiple languages (including C++, CUDA, and OpenCL). DSL programs are automatically parallelized and different parts of the application can run simultaneously on CPUs and GPUs. We present Delite DSLs for machine learning, data querying, graph analysis, and scientific computing and show that they all achieve performance competitive to or exceeding C++ code.

Tools to design hardware at a high level of abstraction promise software-like productivity for hardware designs. Among them, tools like Spiral, HDL Coder, Optimus and MMAlpha target specific application domains and produce highly efficient implementations from high-level input specifications in a Domain Specific Language (DSL). But, developing similar domain-specific High-Level Synthesis (HLS) tools need enormous effort, which might offset their many advantages. In this paper, we propose a novel, cost-effective approach to develop domain-specific HLS tools. We develop the HLS tool by embedding its input DSL in Scala and using Lightweight Modular Staging (LMS), a compiler framework written in Scala, to perform optimizations at different abstraction levels. For example, to optimize computation on matrices, some optimizations are more effective when the program is represented at the level of matrices while others are better applied at the level of individual matrix elements. To illustrate the proposed approach, we create an HLS flow to automatically generate efficient hardware implementations of matrix expressions described in our own high-level specification language. Although a simple example, it shows how easy it is to reuse modules across different HLS flows and to integrate our flow with existing tools like LegUp, a C-to-RTL compiler, and FloPoCo, an arithmetic core generator. The results reveal that our approach can simultaneously achieve high productivity and design quality with a very reasonable tool development effort.

Program generators for high performance libraries are an appealing solution to the recurring problem of porting and optimizing code with every new processor generation, but only few such generators exist to date. This is due to not only the difficulty of the design, but also of the actual implementation, which often results in an ad-hoc collection of standalone programs and scripts that are hard to extend, maintain, or reuse. In this paper we ask whether and which programming language concepts and features are needed to enable a more systematic construction of such generators. The systematic approach we advocate extrapolates from existing generators: a) describing the problem and algorithmic knowledge using one, or several, domain-specific languages (DSLs), b) expressing optimizations and choices as rewrite rules on DSL programs, c) designing data structures that can be configured to control the type of code that is generated and the data representation used, and d) using autotuning to select the best-performing alternative. As a case study, we implement a small, but representative subset of Spiral in Scala using the Lightweight Modular Staging (LMS) framework. The first main contribution of this paper is the realization of c) using type classes to abstract over staging decisions, i.e. which pieces of a computation are performed immediately and for which pieces code is generated. Specifically, we abstract over different complex data representations jointly with different code representations including generating loops versus unrolled code with scalar replacement - a crucial and usually tedious performance transformation. The second main contribution is to provide full support for a) and d) within the LMS framework: we extend LMS to support translation between different DSLs and autotuning through search.

Domain-specific languages provide a promising path to automatically compile high-level code to parallel, heterogeneous, and distributed hardware. However, in practice high performance DSLs still require considerable software expertise to develop and force users into tool-chains that hinder prototyping and debugging. To address these problems, we present Forge, a new meta DSL for declaratively specifying high performance embedded DSLs. Forge provides DSL authors with high-level abstractions (e.g., data structures, parallel patterns, effects) for specifying their DSL in a way that permits high performance. From this high-level specification, Forge automatically generates both a naïve Scala library implementation of the DSL and a high performance version using the Delite DSL framework. Users of a Forge-generated DSL can prototype their application using the library version, and then switch to the Delite version to run on multicore CPUs, GPUs, and clusters without changing the application code. Forge-generated Delite DSLs perform within 2x of hand-optimized C++ and up to 40x better than Spark, an alternative high-level distributed programming environment. Compared to a manually implemented Delite DSL, Forge provides a factor of 3-6x reduction in lines of code and does not sacrifice any performance. Furthermore, Forge specifications can be generated from existing Scala libraries, are easy to maintain, shield DSL developers from changes in the Delite framework, and enable DSLs to be retargeted to other frameworks transparently.

High level data structures are a cornerstone of modern programming and at the same time stand in the way of compiler optimizations. In order to reason about user- or library-defined data structures compilers need to be extensible. Common mechanisms to extend compilers fall into two categories. Frontend macros, staging or partial evaluation systems can be used to programmatically remove abstraction and specialize programs before they enter the compiler. Alternatively, some compilers allow extending the internal workings by adding new transformation passes at different points in the compile chain or adding new intermediate representation (IR) types. None of these mechanisms alone is sufficient to handle the challenges posed by high level data structures. This paper shows a novel way to combine them to yield benefits that are greater than the sum of the parts.

Scala-Virtualized extends the Scala language to better support hosting embedded DSLs. Embedding a DSL in Scala-Virtualized comes with all the benefits of a shallow embedding thanks to Scala's flexible syntax, without giving up analyzing and manipulating the domain program -- typically exclusive to deep embeddings. Through lightweight modular staging, implemented in standard Scala, the benefits of a deep embedding are recovered with little overhead. Scala-Virtualized lifts more of the language's built-in constructs and static information to complete this support and make it more convenient. We illustrate how Scala-Virtualized makes Scala an even better host for embedded DSLs along three axes of customizing the language: syntax, run-time behavior and static semantics.

Domain-specific languages (DSLs) can bridge the gap between high-level programming and efficient execution. However, implementing compiler tool-chains for performance oriented DSLs requires significant effort. Recent research has produced methodologies and frameworks that promise to reduce this development effort by enabling quick transition from library-only, purely embedded DSLs to optimizing compilation. In this case study we report on our experience implementing a compiler for StagedSAC. StagedSAC is a DSL for arithmetic processing with multidimensional arrays modeled after the stand-alone language SAC (Single Assignment C). The main language feature of both SAC and StagedSAC is a loop construction that enables high-level and concise implementations of array algorithms. At the same time, the functional semantics of the two languages allow for advanced compiler optimizations and parallel code generation.

Computing systems are becoming increasingly parallel and heterogeneous, and therefore new applications must be capable of exploiting parallelism in order to continue achieving high performance. However, targeting these emerging devices often requires using multiple disparate programming models and making decisions that can limit forward scalability. In previous work we proposed the use of domain-specific languages (DSLs) to provide high-level abstractions that enable transformations to high performance parallel code without degrading programmer productivity. In this paper we present a new end-to-end system for building, compiling, and executing DSL applications on parallel heterogeneous hardware, the Delite Compiler Framework and Runtime. The framework lifts embedded DSL applications to an intermediate representation (IR), performs generic, parallel, and domain-specific optimizations, and generates an execution graph that targets multiple heterogeneous hardware devices. Finally we present results comparing the performance of several machine learning applications written in OptiML, a DSL for machine learning that utilizes Delite, to C++ and MATLAB implementations. We find that the implicitly parallel OptiML applications achieve single-threaded performance comparable to C++ and outperform explicitly parallel MATLAB in nearly all cases.

Abstract We present a cryptographicallyt‐private protocol for electronic auctions whose low resource demands make it viable for practical use. Our construction is based on Yao's garbled circuits and pseudorandom number generators (PRNGs). Our protocol involves a field of (t+ 1)2parties for the generation of the garbled circuit and permits an arbitrary large number of bidders. The computational requirements are low: Onlyt+ 1 parties of the field have to use the PRNG, the remaining parties execute only primitive computations (XOR, permutations and sharing). The bidders have to stay active for one round of communication, independent of each other. Each bidder has to compute onlyt+ 1 XOR‐operations. We present an implementation and evaluate its performance. The observed running time of our protocol is linear in the size of the auction circuit and the number of bidders and, as expected, grows quadratically in the parametert. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Software engineering demands generality and abstraction, performance demands specialization and concretization. Generative programming can provide both, but the effort required to develop high-quality program generators likely offsets their benefits, even if a multi-stage programming language is used.We present lightweight modular staging, a library-based multi-stage programming approach that breaks with the tradition of syntactic quasi-quotation and instead uses only types to distinguish between binding times. Through extensive use of component technology, lightweight modular staging makes an optimizing compiler framework available at the library level, allowing programmers to tightly integrate domain-specific abstractions and optimizations into the generation process.We argue that lightweight modular staging enables a form of language virtualization, i.e. allows to go from a pure-library embedded language to one that is practically equivalent to a stand-alone implementation with only modest effort.

As heterogeneous parallel systems become dominant, application developers are being forced to turn to an incompatiblemix of low level programming models (e.g. OpenMP, MPI, CUDA, OpenCL). However, these models do little to shield developers from the difficult problems of parallelization, data decomposition and machine-specific details. Most programmersare having a difficult time using these programming models effectively. To provide a programming modelthat addresses the productivity and performance requirements for the average programmer, we explore a domainspecificapproach to heterogeneous parallel programming.

We describe the implementation of first-class polymorphic delimited continuations in the programming language Scala. We use Scala's pluggable typing architecture to implement a simple type and effect system, which discriminates expressions with control effects from those without and accurately tracks answer type modification incurred by control effects. To tackle the problem of implementing first-class continuations under the adverse conditions brought upon by the Java VM, we employ a selective CPS transform, which is driven entirely by effect-annotated types and leaves pure code in direct style. Benchmarks indicate that this high-level approach performs competitively.

We present a feasible cryptographically t-private protocol for electronic auctions. Our construction is based on Yao's garbled circuits and pseudorandom number generators (PRNG). Our protocol involves a field of (t+1)2parties for the generation of the garbled circuit and permits an arbitrary large number of bidders. The computational requirements are low: Only t+1 parties of the field have to use the PRNG, the remaining parties execute simple primitives (XOR, permuting and sharing). Independently from each other, the bidders have to stay active for one round of communication. Furthermore, each bidder has to compute t+1 XOR-operations, only. We present an implementation and evaluate its performance. The observed running time of our protocol is linear in the size of the auction circuit and the number of bidders and, as expected, grows quadratically in the parameter t.