VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Benjamin Busjaeger
dblp:190/1239
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 61% Software maintenance and evolution · 30% Empirical software engineering · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution › release engineering
continuous integration |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Learning for test prioritization: an industrial case study · SIGSOFT FSE 2016 |
Software testing › regression testing › test case prioritization
learning-based test prioritization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Learning for test prioritization: an industrial case study · SIGSOFT FSE 2016 |
Software testing › regression testing
test case prioritization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Learning for test prioritization: an industrial case study · SIGSOFT FSE 2016 |
Empirical software engineering › software engineering research methodology
industrial case study |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Learning for test prioritization: an industrial case study · SIGSOFT FSE 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning · 0.2learning-to-rank · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Learning for test prioritization: an industrial case studyabstractModern cloud-software providers, such as Salesforce.com, increasingly adopt large-scale continuous integration environments. In such environments, assuring high developer productivity is strongly dependent on conducting testing efficiently and effectively. Specifically, to shorten feedback cycles, test prioritization is popularly used as an optimization mechanism for ranking tests to run by their likelihood of revealing failures. To apply test prioritization in industrial environments, we present a novel approach (tailored for practical applicability) that integrates multiple existing techniques via a systematic framework of machine learning to rank. Our initial empirical evaluation on a large real-world dataset from Salesforce.com shows that our approach significantly outperforms existing individual techniques. Benjamin Busjaeger, Tao Xie 0001 |
SIGSOFT FSE | 1 |