Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Benjamin Busjaeger

dblp:190/1239 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 61% Software maintenance and evolution · 30% Empirical software engineering · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution › release engineering
continuous integration
0.212016
Learning for test prioritization: an industrial case study · SIGSOFT FSE 2016
Software testing › regression testing › test case prioritization
learning-based test prioritization
0.212016
Learning for test prioritization: an industrial case study · SIGSOFT FSE 2016
Software testing › regression testing
test case prioritization
0.212016
Learning for test prioritization: an industrial case study · SIGSOFT FSE 2016
Empirical software engineering › software engineering research methodology
industrial case study
0.112016
Learning for test prioritization: an industrial case study · SIGSOFT FSE 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning · 0.2learning-to-rank · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Learning for test prioritization: an industrial case study
abstract
Modern cloud-software providers, such as Salesforce.com, increasingly adopt large-scale continuous integration environments. In such environments, assuring high developer productivity is strongly dependent on conducting testing efficiently and effectively. Specifically, to shorten feedback cycles, test prioritization is popularly used as an optimization mechanism for ranking tests to run by their likelihood of revealing failures. To apply test prioritization in industrial environments, we present a novel approach (tailored for practical applicability) that integrates multiple existing techniques via a systematic framework of machine learning to rank. Our initial empirical evaluation on a large real-world dataset from Salesforce.com shows that our approach significantly outperforms existing individual techniques.
Benjamin Busjaeger, Tao Xie 0001
SIGSOFT FSE1