Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mattis Hartwig

dblp:190/2002 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1507-7647ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 57% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 43%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › statistical relational learning
lifted inference
2.132025
Approximate Lifted Model Construction · IJCAI 2025
An extended view on lifting Gaussian Bayesian networks · Artif. Intell. 2024
Handling Overlaps When Lifting Gaussian Bayesian Networks · IJCAI 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
1.322024
An extended view on lifting Gaussian Bayesian networks · Artif. Intell. 2024
Handling Overlaps When Lifting Gaussian Bayesian Networks · IJCAI 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
bayesian network
0.812024
An extended view on lifting Gaussian Bayesian networks · Artif. Intell. 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › bayesian network
gaussian bayesian networks
0.512021
Handling Overlaps When Lifting Gaussian Bayesian Networks · IJCAI 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › relational model
probabilistic relational model
0.312025
Approximate Lifted Model Construction · IJCAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

factor graph · 0.9color passing · 0.9lifted inference · 0.5complexity analysis · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Multi-dependence Conditional Vector Boosting Categorical Fidelity in Tabular-Data GANs
Melle Mendikowski, Benjamin Schindler, Thomas Schmid 0003, Ralf Möller 0001, Mattis Hartwig
IDEAL (1)5
2025 Approximate Lifted Model Construction
abstract
Probabilistic relational models such as parametric factor graphs enable efficient (lifted) inference by exploiting the indistinguishability of objects. In lifted inference, a representative of indistinguishable objects is used for computations. To obtain a relational (i.e., lifted) representation, the Advanced Colour Passing (ACP) algorithm is the state of the art. The ACP algorithm, however, requires underlying distributions, encoded as potential-based factorisations, to exactly match to identify and exploit indistinguishabilities. Hence, ACP is unsuitable for practical applications where potentials learned from data inevitably deviate even if associated objects are indistinguishable. To mitigate this problem, we introduce the ε-Advanced Colour Passing (ε-ACP) algorithm, which allows for a deviation of potentials depending on a hyperparameter ε. ε-ACP efficiently uncovers and exploits indistinguishabilities that are not exact. We prove that the approximation error induced by ε-ACP is strictly bounded and our experiments show that the approximation error is close to zero in practice.
Malte Luttermann, Jan Speller, Marcel Gehrke, Tanya Braun, Ralf Möller 0001, Mattis Hartwig
IJCAI6
2024 An extended view on lifting Gaussian Bayesian networks
abstract
Lifting probabilistic graphical models and developing lifted inference algorithms aim to use higher level groups of random variables instead of individual instances. In the past, many inference algorithms for discrete probabilistic graphical models have been lifted. Lifting continuous probabilistic graphical models has played a minor role. Since many real-world applications involve continuous random variables, this article turns its focus to lifting approaches for Gaussian Bayesian networks. Specifically, we present algorithms for constructing a lifted joint distribution for scenarios of sequences of overlapping and non-overlapping logical variables. We present operations that work in a fully lifted way including addition, multiplication, and inversion. We present how the operations can be used for lifted query answering algorithms and extend the existing query answering algorithm by a new way of evidence handling. The new way of evidence handling groups evidence that has the same effect on its neighboring variables in cases of partial overlap between the logical-variable sequences. In the theoretical complexity analysis and the experimental evaluation, we show under which conditions the existing lifted approach and the new lifted approach including evidence grouping lead to the most time savings compared to the grounded approach.
Mattis Hartwig, Ralf Möller 0001, Tanya Braun
Artif. Intell.1
2021 Handling Overlaps When Lifting Gaussian Bayesian Networks
abstract
Gaussian Bayesian networks are widely used for modeling the behavior of continuous random variables. Lifting exploits symmetries when dealing with large numbers of isomorphic random variables. It provides a more compact representation for more efficient query answering by encoding the symmetries using logical variables. This paper improves on an existing lifted representation of the joint distribution represented by a Gaussian Bayesian network (lifted joint), allowing overlaps between the logical variables. Handling overlaps without grounding a model is critical for modelling real-world scenarios. Specifically, this paper contributes (i) a lifted joint that allows overlaps in logical variables and (ii) a lifted query answering algorithm using the lifted joint. Complexity analyses and experimental results show that - despite overlaps - constructing a lifted joint and answering queries on the lifted joint outperform their grounded counterparts significantly.
Mattis Hartwig, Tanya Braun, Ralf Möller 0001
IJCAI1