Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Timur Garipov
dblp:190/7045
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Generative modeling · 44% Deep learning architectures and training · 18% Trustworthy machine learning · 15% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Generative Data Mining with Longtail-Guided Diffusion · ICML 2025 Compositional Sculpting of Iterative Generative Processes · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Generative Data Mining with Longtail-Guided Diffusion · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
epistemic uncertainty |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Generative Data Mining with Longtail-Guided Diffusion · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
latent diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Generative Data Mining with Longtail-Guided Diffusion · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
morphological analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BERT-like Models for Slavic Morpheme Segmentation · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › guided diffusion
classifier guidance |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Compositional Sculpting of Iterative Generative Processes · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Adversarial Support Alignment · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty and calibration |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNs · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss landscape |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNs · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss landscape
mode connectivity |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNs · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › iterate averaging
stochastic weight averaging |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learning · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vision-language model · 0.9longtail guidance · 0.9latent diffusion · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9ensemble · 0.9convolutional neural network · 0.9BERT · 0.9classifier guidance · 0.7GFlowNets · 0.7adversarial training · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | BERT-like Models for Slavic Morpheme SegmentationabstractAutomatic morpheme segmentation algorithms are applicable in various tasks, such as building tokenizers and language education. For Slavic languages, the development of such algorithms is complicated by the rich derivational capabilities of these languages. Previous research has shown that, on average, these algorithms have already reached expert-level quality. However, a key unresolved issue is the significant decline in performance when segmenting words containing roots not present in the training data. This problem can be partially addressed by using pre-trained language models to better account for word semantics. In this work, we explored the possibility of fine-tuning BERT-like models for morpheme segmentation using data from Belarusian, Czech, and Russian. We found that for Czech and Russian, our models outperform all previously proposed approaches, achieving word-level accuracy of 92.5-95.1%. For Belarusian, this task was addressed for the first time. The best-performing approach for Belarusian was an ensemble of convolutional neural networks with word-level accuracy of 90.45%. Dmitry Morozov, Lizaveta Astapenka, Anna V. Glazkova, Timur Garipov, Olga Lyashevskaya |
ACL (1) | 4 |
| 2025 | Generative Data Mining with Longtail-Guided DiffusionabstractIt is difficult to anticipate the myriad challenges that a predictive model will encounter once deployed. Common practice entails a reactive, cyclical approach: model deployment, data mining, and retraining. We instead develop a proactive longtail discovery process by imagining additional data during training. In particular, we develop general model-based longtail signals, including a differentiable, single forward pass formulation of epistemic uncertainty that does not impact model parameters or predictive performance but can flag rare or hard inputs. We leverage these signals as guidance to generate additional training data from a latent diffusion model in a process we call Longtail Guidance (LTG). Crucially, we can perform LTG without retraining the diffusion model or the predictive model, and we do not need to expose the predictive model to intermediate diffusion states. Data generated by LTG exhibit semantically meaningful variation, yield significant generalization improvements on numerous image classification benchmarks, and can be analyzed by a VLM to proactively discover, textually explain, and address conceptual gaps in a deployed predictive model. David S. Hayden, Mao Ye 0006, Timur Garipov, Gregory P. Meyer, Carl Vondrick, Yuning Chai, Eric M. Wolff, Siddhartha S. Srinivasa |
ICML | 3 |
| 2023 | Compositional Sculpting of Iterative Generative ProcessesabstractHigh training costs of generative models and the need to fine-tune them for specific tasks have created a strong interest in model reuse and composition.
A key challenge in composing iterative generative processes, such as GFlowNets and diffusion models, is that to realize the desired target distribution, all steps of the generative process need to be coordinated, and satisfy delicate balance conditions.
In this work, we propose Compositional Sculpting: a general approach for defining compositions of iterative generative processes. We then introduce a method for sampling from these compositions built on classifier guidance.
We showcase ways to accomplish compositional sculpting in both GFlowNets and diffusion models. We highlight two binary operations $\\unicode{x2014}$ the $\\textit{harmonic mean}\\unicode{x00A0}(p_1 \\otimes p_2$) and the $\\textit{contrast}\\unicode{x00A0}(p_1 \\,\\unicode{x25D1}\\,\\, p_2$) between pairs, and the generalization of these operations to multiple component distributions.
We offer empirical results on image and molecular generation tasks. Project codebase: https://github.com/timgaripov/compositional-sculpting. Timur Garipov, Sebastiaan De Peuter, Ge Yang 0003, Vikas Garg 0001, Samuel Kaski, Tommi S. Jaakkola |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Adversarial Support Alignment
Shangyuan Tong, Timur Garipov, Yang Zhang 0001, Shiyu Chang, Tommi S. Jaakkola |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2019 | A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep LearningabstractWe propose SWA-Gaussian (SWAG), a simple, scalable, and general purpose approach for uncertainty representation and calibration in deep learning. Stochastic Weight Averaging (SWA), which computes the first moment of stochastic gradient descent (SGD) iterates with a modified learning rate schedule, has recently been shown to improve generalization in deep learning. With SWAG, we fit a Gaussian using the SWA solution as the first moment and a low rank plus diagonal covariance also derived from the SGD iterates, forming an approximate posterior distribution over neural network weights; we then sample from this Gaussian distribution to perform Bayesian model averaging. We empirically find that SWAG approximates the shape of the true posterior, in accordance with results describing the stationary distribution of SGD iterates. Moreover, we demonstrate that SWAG performs well on a wide variety of tasks, including out of sample detection, calibration, and transfer learning, in comparison to many popular alternatives including variational inference, MC dropout, KFAC Laplace, and temperature scaling. Wesley J. Maddox, Pavel Izmailov, Timur Garipov, Dmitry P. Vetrov, Andrew Gordon Wilson |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2019 | Subspace Inference for Bayesian Deep Learning
Pavel Izmailov, Wesley J. Maddox, Polina Kirichenko, Timur Garipov, Dmitry P. Vetrov, Andrew Gordon Wilson |
UAI | 4 |
| 2018 | Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNsabstractThe loss functions of deep neural networks are complex and their geometric properties are not well understood. We show that the optima of these complex loss functions are in fact connected by simple curves, over which training and test accuracy are nearly constant. We introduce a training procedure to discover these high-accuracy pathways between modes. Inspired by this new geometric insight, we also propose a new ensembling method entitled Fast Geometric Ensembling (FGE). Using FGE we can train high-performing ensembles in the time required to train a single model. We achieve improved performance compared to the recent state-of-the-art Snapshot Ensembles, on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet. Timur Garipov, Pavel Izmailov, Dmitrii Podoprikhin, Dmitry P. Vetrov, Andrew Gordon Wilson |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2018 | Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalization
Pavel Izmailov, Dmitrii Podoprikhin, Timur Garipov, Dmitry P. Vetrov, Andrew Gordon Wilson |
UAI | 3 |