Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adam Stooke
dblp:190/7213
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 50% Speech recognition and synthesis · 19% Deep learning architectures and training · 19% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
automatic speech recognition |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Aligner-Encoders: Self-Attention Transformers Can Be Self-Transducers · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › automatic speech recognition › end-to-end speech recognition
neural transducer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Aligner-Encoders: Self-Attention Transformers Can Be Self-Transducers · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
self-attention |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Aligner-Encoders: Self-Attention Transformers Can Be Self-Transducers · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Aligner-Encoders: Self-Attention Transformers Can Be Self-Transducers · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Reinforcement Learning with Augmented Data · NeurIPS 2020 #Exploration: A Study of Count-Based Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Decoupling Representation Learning from Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation
representation learning for reinforcement learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Decoupling Representation Learning from Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
constrained reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methods · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
data augmentation for reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Reinforcement Learning with Augmented Data · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › constrained optimization
lagrangian methods |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methods · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methods · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › sample efficiency
sample-efficient reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Reinforcement Learning with Augmented Data · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › deep reinforcement learning
visual reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Reinforcement Learning with Augmented Data · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration › novelty-based exploration
count-based exploration |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | #Exploration: A Study of Count-Based Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | #Exploration: A Study of Count-Based Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learning · NIPS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-attention · 0.8cross-entropy loss · 0.8unsupervised learning · 0.5convolutional encoder · 0.5contrastive learning · 0.5lagrangian method · 0.4data augmentation · 0.4convolutional neural network · 0.4PID control · 0.4hash-based state counting · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Extreme Encoder Output Frame Rate Reduction: Improving Computational Latencies of Large End-to-End ModelsabstractThe accuracy of end-to-end (E2E) automatic speech recognition (ASR) models continues to improve as they are scaled to larger sizes, with some now reaching billions of parameters. Widespread deployment and adoption of these models, however, requires computationally efficient strategies for decoding. In the present work, we study one such strategy: applying multiple frame reduction layers in the encoder to compress encoder outputs into a small number of output frames. While similar techniques have been investigated in previous work, we achieve dramatically more reduction than has previously been demonstrated through the use of multiple funnel reduction layers. Through ablations, we study the impact of various architectural choices in the encoder to identify the most effective strategies. We demonstrate that we can generate one encoder output frame for every 2.56 sec of input speech, without significantly affecting word error rate on a large-scale voice search task, while improving encoder and decoder latencies by 48% and 92% respectively, relative to a strong but computationally expensive baseline. Rohit Prabhavalkar, Zhong Meng, Adam Stooke, Xingyu Cai, Yanzhang He, Arun Narayanan, Dongseong Hwang, Tara N. Sainath, Pedro J. Moreno 0001 |
ICASSP | 4 |
| 2024 | A Comparison of Parameter-Efficient ASR Domain Adaptation Methods for Universal Speech and Language ModelsabstractA recent paradigm shift in artificial intelligence has seen the rise of foundation models, such as the large language models and the universal speech models. With billions of model parameters and trained with a wide range of data, these foundation models are expected to have a better generalization to different downstream tasks. Efficient adaptation is the key to leveraging these foundation models in a new task or domain. In this paper, we compare several popular parameter-efficient tuning methods, such as vector adaptation, residual adapters, low-rank adapter (LoRA) and prompt-tuning, for automatic speech recognition (ASR) domain adaptation. We use the connectionist temporal classification (CTC) model with Conformer encoder and fused it with a universal language model. We study the effect of adapting either or both of the Conformer encoder and the universal language model. We carry out extensive experiments to study these methods under different hyper-parameter settings and the effect of combining some of these methods. We find that combining vector adaptation and residual adapters with increasing bottleneck dimension achieved the best performance. Khe Chai Sim, Zhouyuan Huo, Tsendsuren Munkhdalai, Nikhil Siddhartha, Adam Stooke, Zhong Meng, Bo Li 0028, Tara N. Sainath |
ICASSP | 5 |
| 2024 | Massive End-to-end Speech Recognition Models with Time ReductionabstractWeiran Wang, Rohit Prabhavalkar, Haozhe Shan, Zhong Meng, Dongseong Hwang, Qiujia Li, Khe Chai Sim, Bo Li, James Qin, Xingyu Cai, Adam Stooke, Chengjian Zheng, Yanzhang He, Tara Sainath, Pedro Moreno Mengibar. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Rohit Prabhavalkar, Haozhe Shan, Zhong Meng, Dongseong Hwang, Qiujia Li, Khe Chai Sim, Bo Li 0028, James Qin, Xingyu Cai, Adam Stooke, Chengjian Zheng, Yanzhang He, Tara N. Sainath, Pedro J. Moreno 0001 |
NAACL-HLT | 11 |
| 2024 | Aligner-Encoders: Self-Attention Transformers Can Be Self-TransducersabstractModern systems for automatic speech recognition, including the RNN-Transducer and Attention-based Encoder-Decoder (AED), are designed so that the encoder is not required to alter the time-position of information from the audio sequence into the embedding; alignment to the final text output is processed during decoding. We discover that the transformer-based encoder adopted in recent years is actually capable of performing the alignment internally during the forward pass, prior to decoding. This new phenomenon enables a simpler and more efficient model, the ''Aligner-Encoder''. To train it, we discard the dynamic programming of RNN-T in favor of the frame-wise cross-entropy loss of AED, while the decoder employs the lighter text-only recurrence of RNN-T without learned cross-attention---it simply scans embedding frames in order from the beginning, producing one token each until predicting the end-of-message. We conduct experiments demonstrating performance remarkably close to the state of the art, including a special inference configuration enabling long-form recognition. In a representative comparison, we measure the total inference time for our model to be 2x faster than RNN-T and 16x faster than AED. Lastly, we find that the audio-text alignment is clearly visible in the self-attention weights of a certain layer, which could be said to perform ''self-transduction''. Adam Stooke, Rohit Prabhavalkar, Khe Chai Sim, Pedro J. Moreno 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Internal Language Model Personalization of E2E Automatic Speech Recognition Using Random Encoder FeaturesabstractEnd-to-end (E2E) speech-to-text models generally require transcribed audio for training and personalization. We introduce the use of random audio encoder features, rather than speech, to fine-tune the final model layers and acquire new vocabulary from text-only data. This technique can be used for on-device personalization before the user has provided any speech data. We show improvements in the recall of new vocabulary and word error rate (WER) on held-out test sets using simulated user experiments on hybrid autoregressive transducer (HAT) models using conformer-based encoders and simple text embeddings for label processing. We compare this approach to the use of synthetic audio, finding random encoder features to be more beneficial with lower computational cost. Experiments show that the maximum benefit is gained by updating specific network components comprising a subset of those expressing the internal language model. Adam Stooke, Khe Chai Sim, Mason Chua, Tsendsuren Munkhdalai, Trevor Strohman |
SLT | 1 |
| 2021 | Decoupling Representation Learning from Reinforcement LearningabstractIn an effort to overcome limitations of reward-driven feature learning in deep reinforcement learning (RL) from images, we propose decoupling representation learning from policy learning. To this end, we introduce a new unsupervised learning (UL) task, called Augmented Temporal Contrast (ATC), which trains a convolutional encoder to associate pairs of observations separated by a short time difference, under image augmentations and using a contrastive loss. In online RL experiments, we show that training the encoder exclusively using ATC matches or outperforms end-to-end RL in most environments. Additionally, we benchmark several leading UL algorithms by pre-training encoders on expert demonstrations and using them, with weights frozen, in RL agents; we find that agents using ATC-trained encoders outperform all others. We also train multi-task encoders on data from multiple environments and show generalization to different downstream RL tasks. Finally, we ablate components of ATC, and introduce a new data augmentation to enable replay of (compressed) latent images from pre-trained encoders when RL requires augmentation. Our experiments span visually diverse RL benchmarks in DeepMind Control, DeepMind Lab, and Atari, and our complete code is available at \url{https://github.com/astooke/rlpyt/tree/master/rlpyt/ul}. Adam Stooke, Kimin Lee, Pieter Abbeel, Michael Laskin |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian MethodsabstractLagrangian methods are widely used algorithms for constrained optimization problems, but their learning dynamics exhibit oscillations and overshoot which, when applied to safe reinforcement learning, leads to constraint-violating behavior during agent training. We address this shortcoming by proposing a novel Lagrange multiplier update method that utilizes derivatives of the constraint function. We take a controls perspective, wherein the traditional Lagrange multiplier update behaves as \emph{integral} control; our terms introduce \emph{proportional} and \emph{derivative} control, achieving favorable learning dynamics through damping and predictive measures. We apply our PID Lagrangian methods in deep RL, setting a new state of the art in Safety Gym, a safe RL benchmark. Lastly, we introduce a new method to ease controller tuning by providing invariance to the relative numerical scales of reward and cost. Our extensive experiments demonstrate improved performance and hyperparameter robustness, while our algorithms remain nearly as simple to derive and implement as the traditional Lagrangian approach. Adam Stooke, Joshua Achiam, Pieter Abbeel |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Reinforcement Learning with Augmented DataabstractLearning from visual observations is a fundamental yet challenging problem in Reinforcement Learning (RL). Although algorithmic advances combined with convolutional neural networks have proved to be a recipe for success, current methods are still lacking on two fronts: (a) data-efficiency of learning and (b) generalization to new environments. To this end, we present Reinforcement Learning with Augmented Data (RAD), a simple plug-and-play module that can enhance most RL algorithms. We perform the first extensive study of general data augmentations for RL on both pixel-based and state-based inputs, and introduce two new data augmentations - random translate and random amplitude scale. We show that augmentations such as random translate, crop, color jitter, patch cutout, random convolutions, and amplitude scale can enable simple RL algorithms to outperform complex state-of-the-art methods across common benchmarks. RAD sets a new state-of-the-art in terms of data-efficiency and final performance on the DeepMind Control Suite benchmark for pixel-based control as well as OpenAI Gym benchmark for state-based control. We further demonstrate that RAD significantly improves test-time generalization over existing methods on several OpenAI ProcGen benchmarks. Michael Laskin, Kimin Lee, Adam Stooke, Lerrel Pinto, Pieter Abbeel, Aravind Srinivas |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2017 | #Exploration: A Study of Count-Based Exploration for Deep Reinforcement LearningabstractCount-based exploration algorithms are known to perform near-optimally when used in conjunction with tabular reinforcement learning (RL) methods for solving small discrete Markov decision processes (MDPs). It is generally thought that count-based methods cannot be applied in high-dimensional state spaces, since most states will only occur once. Recent deep RL exploration strategies are able to deal with high-dimensional continuous state spaces through complex heuristics, often relying on optimism in the face of uncertainty or intrinsic motivation. In this work, we describe a surprising finding: a simple generalization of the classic count-based approach can reach near state-of-the-art performance on various high-dimensional and/or continuous deep RL benchmarks. States are mapped to hash codes, which allows to count their occurrences with a hash table. These counts are then used to compute a reward bonus according to the classic count-based exploration theory. We find that simple hash functions can achieve surprisingly good results on many challenging tasks. Furthermore, we show that a domain-dependent learned hash code may further improve these results. Detailed analysis reveals important aspects of a good hash function: 1) having appropriate granularity and 2) encoding information relevant to solving the MDP. This exploration strategy achieves near state-of-the-art performance on both continuous control tasks and Atari 2600 games, hence providing a simple yet powerful baseline for solving MDPs that require considerable exploration. Rein Houthooft, Davis Foote, Adam Stooke, Xi Chen 0022, Yan Duan, John Schulman, Filip De Turck, Pieter Abbeel |
NIPS | 4 |