Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Prafulla Dhariwal
dblp:190/7235
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
10 papers |
Generative modeling · 64% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 7% Deep learning architectures and training · 6% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Visual content generation and editing · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% |
Topics — the 21 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
3.0 | 5 | 2024 | Improved Techniques for Training Consistency Models · ICLR 2024 Consistency Models · ICML 2023 GLIDE: Towards Photorealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text-Guided Diffusion Models · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
consistency model |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Improved Techniques for Training Consistency Models · ICLR 2024 Consistency Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
consistency training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Improved Techniques for Training Consistency Models · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distillation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Consistency Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GLIDE: Towards Photorealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text-Guided Diffusion Models · ICML 2022 |
Visual content generation and editing › image editing
text-guided image editing |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GLIDE: Towards Photorealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text-Guided Diffusion Models · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › guided diffusion
classifier guidance |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › score-based generative model
denoising diffusion probabilistic model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
image generation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
likelihood estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models · ICML 2021 |
Visual content generation and editing
image generation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models · ICML 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › neural language model
autoregressive language model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
few-shot learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Language Models are Few-Shot Learners · NeurIPS 2020 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › theorem proving
interactive theorem proving |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | GamePad: A Learning Environment for Theorem Proving · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
theorem proving |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | GamePad: A Learning Environment for Theorem Proving · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Parameter Space Noise for Exploration · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutions · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Variational Lossy Autoencoder · ICLR (Poster) 2017 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
rate-distortion tradeoff |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Variational Lossy Autoencoder · ICLR (Poster) 2017 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Variational Lossy Autoencoder · ICLR (Poster) 2017 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
inpainting · 1.1classifier-free guidance · 1.1CLIP guidance · 1.1variance learning · 1.0reverse diffusion · 1.0pseudo-huber loss · 0.8lognormal noise schedule · 0.8exponential moving average · 0.8consistency training · 0.7consistency distillation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Improved Techniques for Training Consistency ModelsabstractConsistency models are a nascent family of generative models that can sample high quality data in one step without the need for adversarial training. Current consistency models achieve optimal sample quality by distilling from pre-trained diffusion models and employing learned metrics such as LPIPS. However, distillation limits the quality of consistency models to that of the pre-trained diffusion model, and LPIPS causes undesirable bias in evaluation. To tackle these challenges, we present improved techniques for consistency training, where consistency models learn directly from data without distillation. We delve into the theory behind consistency training and identify a previously overlooked flaw, which we address by eliminating Exponential Moving Average from the teacher consistency model. To replace learned metrics like LPIPS, we adopt Pseudo-Huber losses from robust statistics. Additionally, we introduce a lognormal noise schedule for the consistency training objective, and propose to double total discretization steps every set number of training iterations. Combined with better hyperparameter tuning, these modifications enable consistency models to achieve FID scores of 2.51 and 3.25 on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet $64\times 64$ respectively in a single sampling step. These scores mark a 3.5$\times$ and 4$\times$ improvement compared to prior consistency training approaches. Through two-step sampling, we further reduce FID scores to 2.24 and 2.77 on these two datasets, surpassing those obtained via distillation in both one-step and two-step settings, while narrowing the gap between consistency models and other state-of-the-art generative models. Prafulla Dhariwal |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | Consistency ModelsabstractDiffusion models have significantly advanced the fields of image, audio, and video generation, but they depend on an iterative sampling process that causes slow generation. To overcome this limitation, we propose consistency models, a new family of models that generate high quality samples by directly mapping noise to data. They support fast one-step generation by design, while still allowing multistep sampling to trade compute for sample quality. They also support zero-shot data editing, such as image inpainting, colorization, and super-resolution, without requiring explicit training on these tasks. Consistency models can be trained either by distilling pre-trained diffusion models, or as standalone generative models altogether. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that they outperform existing distillation techniques for diffusion models in one- and few-step sampling, achieving the new state-of-the-art FID of 3.55 on CIFAR-10 and 6.20 on ImageNet 64x64 for one-step generation. When trained in isolation, consistency models become a new family of generative models that can outperform existing one-step, non-adversarial generative models on standard benchmarks such as CIFAR-10, ImageNet 64x64 and LSUN 256x256. Prafulla Dhariwal, Mark Chen 0003, Ilya Sutskever |
ICML | 2 |
| 2022 | GLIDE: Towards Photorealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text-Guided Diffusion ModelsabstractDiffusion models have recently been shown to generate high-quality synthetic images, especially when paired with a guidance technique to trade off diversity for fidelity. We explore diffusion models for the problem of text-conditional image synthesis and compare two different guidance strategies: CLIP guidance and classifier-free guidance. We find that the latter is preferred by human evaluators for both photorealism and caption similarity, and often produces photorealistic samples. Samples from a 3.5 billion parameter text-conditional diffusion model using classifier-free guidance are favored by human evaluators to those from DALL-E, even when the latter uses expensive CLIP reranking. Additionally, we find that our models can be fine-tuned to perform image inpainting, enabling powerful text-driven image editing. We train a smaller model on a filtered dataset and release the code and weights at https://github.com/openai/glide-text2im. Alex Nichol, Prafulla Dhariwal, Aditya Ramesh, Pranav Shyam, Pamela Mishkin, Bob McGrew, Ilya Sutskever, Mark Chen 0003 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsabstractDenoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPM) are a class of generative models which have recently been shown to produce excellent samples. We show that with a few simple modifications, DDPMs can also achieve competitive log-likelihoods while maintaining high sample quality. Additionally, we find that learning variances of the reverse diffusion process allows sampling with an order of magnitude fewer forward passes with a negligible difference in sample quality, which is important for the practical deployment of these models. We additionally use precision and recall to compare how well DDPMs and GANs cover the target distribution. Finally, we show that the sample quality and likelihood of these models scale smoothly with model capacity and training compute, making them easily scalable. We release our code and pre-trained models at https://github.com/openai/improved-diffusion. Alex Nichol, Prafulla Dhariwal |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image SynthesisabstractWe show that diffusion models can achieve image sample quality superior to the current state-of-the-art generative models. We achieve this on unconditional image synthesis by finding a better architecture through a series of ablations. For conditional image synthesis, we further improve sample quality with classifier guidance: a simple, compute-efficient method for trading off diversity for fidelity using gradients from a classifier. We achieve an FID of 2.97 on ImageNet 128$\times$128, 4.59 on ImageNet 256$\times$256, and 7.72 on ImageNet 512$\times$512, and we match BigGAN-deep even with as few as 25 forward passes per sample, all while maintaining better coverage of the distribution. Finally, we find that classifier guidance combines well with upsampling diffusion models, further improving FID to 3.94 on ImageNet 256$\times$256 and 3.85 on ImageNet 512$\times$512. Prafulla Dhariwal, Alex Nichol |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersabstractWe demonstrate that scaling up language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes even becoming competitive with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with 175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model, and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3 achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation, question-answering, and cloze tasks. We also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles, as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to training on large web corpora. Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Thomas Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeff Wu 0003, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen 0003, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, Dario Amodei |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2019 | GamePad: A Learning Environment for Theorem Proving
Daniel Huang 0001, Prafulla Dhariwal, Dawn Song, Ilya Sutskever |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2018 | Parameter Space Noise for Exploration
Matthias Plappert, Rein Houthooft, Prafulla Dhariwal, Szymon Sidor, Richard Y. Chen, Xi Chen 0022, Tamim Asfour, Pieter Abbeel, Marcin Andrychowicz |
ICLR (Poster) | 3 |
| 2018 | Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 ConvolutionsabstractFlow-based generative models are conceptually attractive due to tractability of the exact log-likelihood, tractability of exact latent-variable inference, and parallelizability of both training and synthesis. In this paper we propose Glow, a simple type of generative flow using invertible 1x1 convolution. Using our method we demonstrate a significant improvement in log-likelihood and qualitative sample quality. Perhaps most strikingly, we demonstrate that a generative model optimized towards the plain log-likelihood objective is capable of efficient synthesis of large and subjectively realistic-looking images. Diederik P. Kingma, Prafulla Dhariwal |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2017 | Variational Lossy Autoencoder
Xi Chen 0022, Diederik P. Kingma, Tim Salimans, Yan Duan, Prafulla Dhariwal, John Schulman, Ilya Sutskever, Pieter Abbeel |
ICLR (Poster) | 5 |