Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anand Gopalakrishnan
dblp:191/1040
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 30% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25% Image recognition and object detection · 16% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Computer animation and physical simulation · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
actor-critic methods |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Exploring the Promise and Limits of Real-Time Recurrent Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
complex-valued neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Recurrent Complex-Weighted Autoencoders for Unsupervised Object Discovery · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Exploring the Promise and Limits of Real-Time Recurrent Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
real-time recurrent learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Exploring the Promise and Limits of Real-Time Recurrent Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Exploring the Promise and Limits of Real-Time Recurrent Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object discovery
unsupervised object discovery |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Recurrent Complex-Weighted Autoencoders for Unsupervised Object Discovery · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Contrastive Training of Complex-Valued Autoencoders for Object Discovery · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
object-centric representation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Contrastive Training of Complex-Valued Autoencoders for Object Discovery · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › object-centric representation learning
slot attention |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Contrastive Training of Complex-Valued Autoencoders for Object Discovery · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › anchor-free object detection
keypoint-based object detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Unsupervised Object Keypoint Learning using Local Spatial Predictability · ICLR 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › low-level vision › feature detection
unsupervised keypoint learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Unsupervised Object Keypoint Learning using Local Spatial Predictability · ICLR 2021 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
trajectory learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Neural Temporal Model for Human Motion Prediction · CVPR 2019 |
Computer animation and physical simulation
human motion prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Neural Temporal Model for Human Motion Prediction · CVPR 2019 |
Computer animation and physical simulation › motion synthesis › human motion synthesis
long-term motion synthesis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A Neural Temporal Model for Human Motion Prediction · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
temporal neural networks |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | A Neural Temporal Model for Human Motion Prediction · CVPR 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
recurrent network · 0.8real-time recurrent learning · 0.8policy gradient · 0.8multi-objective loss · 0.8iterative constraint satisfaction · 0.8complex-valued autoencoders · 0.8contrastive learning · 0.7complex-valued activation · 0.7spatial predictability · 0.5self-supervised learning · 0.5neural temporal model · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mindstorms in Natural Language-Based Societies of MindabstractInspired by Minsky's Society of Mind, Schmidhuber's Learning to Think, and other more recent works, this paper proposes and advocates for the concept of natural language-based societies of mind (NLSOMs). We imagine these societies as consisting of a collection of multimodal neural networks, including large language models, which engage in a “mindstorm” to solve problems using a shared natural language interface. Here, we work to identify and discuss key questions about the social structure, governance, and economic principles for NLSOMs, emphasizing their impact on the future of AI. Our demonstrations with NLSOMs-which feature up to 129 agents-show their effectiveness in various tasks, including visual question answering, image captioning, and prompt generation for text-to-image synthesis. Mingchen Zhuge, Francesco Faccio, Dylan R. Ashley, Róbert Csordás, Anand Gopalakrishnan, Abdullah Hamdi, Hasan Hammoud, Vincent Herrmann, Kazuki Irie, Louis Kirsch, Bing Li 0024, Guohao Li 0001, Shuming Liu 0001, Jinjie Mai, Piotr Piekos, Aditya A. Ramesh, Imanol Schlag, Aleksandar Stanic, Yuhui Wang 0004, Mengmeng Xu 0006, Deng-Ping Fan, Bernard Ghanem, Jürgen Schmidhuber |
Comput. Vis. Media | 6 |
| 2024 | Exploring the Promise and Limits of Real-Time Recurrent LearningabstractReal-time recurrent learning (RTRL) for sequence-processing recurrent neural networks (RNNs) offers certain conceptual advantages over backpropagation through time (BPTT). RTRL requires neither caching past activations nor truncating context, and enables online learning. However, RTRL's time and space complexity make it impractical. To overcome this problem, most recent work on RTRL focuses on approximation theories, while experiments are often limited to diagnostic settings. Here we explore the practical promise of RTRL in more realistic settings. We study actor-critic methods that combine RTRL and policy gradients, and test them in several subsets of DMLab-30, ProcGen, and Atari-2600 environments. On DMLab memory tasks, our system trained on fewer than 1.2B environmental frames is competitive with or outperforms well-known IMPALA and R2D2 baselines trained on 10B frames. To scale to such challenging tasks, we focus on certain well-known neural architectures with element-wise recurrence, allowing for tractable RTRL without approximation. Importantly, we also discuss rarely addressed limitations of RTRL in real-world applications, such as its complexity in the multi-layer case. Kazuki Irie, Anand Gopalakrishnan, Jürgen Schmidhuber |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | Recurrent Complex-Weighted Autoencoders for Unsupervised Object DiscoveryabstractCurrent state-of-the-art synchrony-based models encode object bindings with complex-valued activations and compute with real-valued weights in feedforward architectures. We argue for the computational advantages of a recurrent architecture with complex-valued weights. We propose a fully convolutional autoencoder, SynCx, that performs iterative constraint satisfaction: at each iteration, a hidden layer bottleneck encodes statistically regular configurations of features in particular phase relationships; over iterations, local constraints propagate and the model converges to a globally consistent configuration of phase assignments. Binding is achieved simply by the matrix-vector product operation between complex-valued weights and activations, without the need for additional mechanisms that have been incorporated into current synchrony-based models. SynCx outperforms or is strongly competitive with current models for unsupervised object discovery. SynCx also avoids certain systematic grouping errors of current models, such as the inability to separate similarly colored objects without additional supervision. Anand Gopalakrishnan, Aleksandar Stanic, Jürgen Schmidhuber, Michael C. Mozer |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Contrastive Training of Complex-Valued Autoencoders for Object DiscoveryabstractCurrent state-of-the-art object-centric models use slots and attention-based routing for binding. However, this class of models has several conceptual limitations: the number of slots is hardwired; all slots have equal capacity; training has high computational cost; there are no object-level relational factors within slots. Synchrony-based models in principle can address these limitations by using complex-valued activations which store binding information in their phase components. However, working examples of such synchrony-based models have been developed only very recently, and are still limited to toy grayscale datasets and simultaneous storage of less than three objects in practice. Here we introduce architectural modifications and a novel contrastive learning method that greatly improve the state-of-the-art synchrony-based model. For the first time, we obtain a class of synchrony-based models capable of discovering objects in an unsupervised manner in multi-object color datasets and simultaneously representing more than three objects. Aleksandar Stanic, Anand Gopalakrishnan, Kazuki Irie, Jürgen Schmidhuber |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | Unsupervised Learning of Temporal Abstractions With Slot-Based TransformersabstractThe discovery of reusable subroutines simplifies decision making and planning in complex reinforcement learning problems. Previous approaches propose to learn such temporal abstractions in an unsupervised fashion through observing state-action trajectories gathered from executing a policy. However, a current limitation is that they process each trajectory in an entirely sequential manner, which prevents them from revising earlier decisions about subroutine boundary points in light of new incoming information. In this work, we propose slot-based transformer for temporal abstraction (SloTTAr), a fully parallel approach that integrates sequence processing transformers with a slot attention module to discover subroutines in an unsupervised fashion while leveraging adaptive computation for learning about the number of such subroutines solely based on their empirical distribution. We demonstrate how SloTTAr is capable of outperforming strong baselines in terms of boundary point discovery, even for sequences containing variable amounts of subroutines, while being up to seven times faster to train on existing benchmarks. Anand Gopalakrishnan, Kazuki Irie, Jürgen Schmidhuber, Sjoerd van Steenkiste |
Neural Comput. | 1 |
| 2021 | Unsupervised Object Keypoint Learning using Local Spatial Predictability
Anand Gopalakrishnan, Sjoerd van Steenkiste, Jürgen Schmidhuber |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2019 | A Neural Temporal Model for Human Motion PredictionabstractWe propose novel neural temporal models for predicting and synthesizing human motion, achieving state-of-the-art in modeling long-term motion trajectories while being competitive with prior work in short-term prediction and requiring significantly less computation. Key aspects of our proposed system include: 1) a novel, two-level processing architecture that aids in generating planned trajectories, 2) a simple set of easily computable features that integrate derivative information, and 3) a novel multi-objective loss function that helps the model to slowly progress from simple next-step prediction to the harder task of multi-step, closed-loop prediction. Our results demonstrate that these innovations improve the modeling of long-term motion trajectories. Finally, we propose a novel metric, called Normalized Power Spectrum Similarity (NPSS), to evaluate the long-term predictive ability of motion synthesis models, complementing the popular mean-squared error (MSE) measure of Euler joint angles over time. We conduct a user study to determine if the proposed NPSS correlates with human evaluation of long-term motion more strongly than MSE and find that it indeed does. We release code and additional results (visualizations) for this paper at: https://github.com/cr7anand/neural_temporal_models. Anand Gopalakrishnan, Ankur Mali, Daniel Kifer, C. Lee Giles, Alexander Ororbia |
CVPR | 1 |