Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Connor Lane

dblp:191/1185 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 75% Learning theory · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
dropout
0.412020
On the Regularization Properties of Structured Dropout · CVPR 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.412020
On the Regularization Properties of Structured Dropout · CVPR 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
regularization theory
0.412020
On the Regularization Properties of Structured Dropout · CVPR 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization › dropout
structured dropout
0.412020
On the Regularization Properties of Structured Dropout · CVPR 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic gradient descent · 0.4spectral k-support norm · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 On the Regularization Properties of Structured Dropout
abstract
Dropout and its extensions (e.g. DropBlock and DropConnect) are popular heuristics for training neural networks, which have been shown to improve generalization performance in practice. However, a theoretical understanding of their optimization and regularization properties remains elusive. Recent work shows that in the case of single hidden-layer linear networks, Dropout is a stochastic gradient descent method for minimizing a regularized loss, and that the regularizer induces solutions that are low-rank and balanced. In this work we show that for single hidden-layer linear networks, DropBlock induces spectral k-support norm regularization, and promotes solutions that are low-rank and have factors with equal norm. We also show that the global minimizer for DropBlock can be computed in closed form, and that DropConnect is equivalent to Dropout. We then show that some of these results can be extended to a general class of Dropout-strategies, and, with some assumptions, to deep non-linear networks when Dropout is applied to the last layer. We verify our theoretical claims and assumptions experimentally with commonly used network architectures.
Ambar Pal, Connor Lane, René Vidal, Benjamin D. Haeffele
CVPR2
2018 Dropout as a Low-Rank Regularizer for Matrix Factorization
abstract
Regularization for matrix factorization (MF) and approximation problems has been carried out in many different ways. Due to its popularity in deep learning, dropout has been applied also for this class of problems. Despite its solid empirical performance, the theoretical properties of dropout as a regularizer remain quite elusive for this class of problems. In this paper, we present a theoretical analysis of dropout for MF, where Bernoulli random variables are used to drop columns of the factors. We demonstrate the equivalence between dropout and a fully deterministic model for MF in which the factors are regularized by the sum of the product of squared Euclidean norms of the columns. Additionally, we inspect the case of a variable sized factorization and we prove that dropout achieves the global minimum of a convex approximation problem with (squared) nuclear norm regularization. As a result, we conclude that dropout can be used as a low-rank regularizer with data dependent singular-value thresholding.
Jacopo Cavazza, Pietro Morerio, Benjamin D. Haeffele, Connor Lane, Vittorio Murino, René Vidal
AISTATS4