VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pavankumar Satuluri
dblp:191/6037 · also Pavan Kumar Satuluri
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 76% Language models and text generation · 24% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Keep it Surprisingly Simple: A Simple First Order Graph Based Parsing Model for Joint Morphosyntactic Parsing in Sanskrit · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › surface realization
linearization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Poetry to Prose Conversion in Sanskrit as a Linearisation Task: A Case for Low-Resource Languages · ACL (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
word ordering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Poetry to Prose Conversion in Sanskrit as a Linearisation Task: A Case for Low-Resource Languages · ACL (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › morphological analysis
morphological tagging |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Free as in Free Word Order: An Energy Based Model for Word Segmentation and Morphological Tagging in Sanskrit · EMNLP 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
word segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Free as in Free Word Order: An Energy Based Model for Word Segmentation and Morphological Tagging in Sanskrit · EMNLP 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph pruning · 0.9exact search · 0.9energy-based model · 0.8energy-based models · 0.4token embedding · 0.4seq2seq · 0.4pre-training · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Keep it Surprisingly Simple: A Simple First Order Graph Based Parsing Model for Joint Morphosyntactic Parsing in SanskritabstractMorphologically rich languages seem to benefit from joint processing of morphology and syntax, as compared to pipeline architectures. We propose a graph-based model for joint morphological parsing and dependency parsing in Sanskrit. Here, we extend the Energy based model framework (Krishna et al., 2020), proposed for several structured prediction tasks in Sanskrit, in 2 simple yet significant ways. First, the framework’s default input graph generation method is modified to generate a multigraph, which enables the use of an exact search inference. Second, we prune the input search space using a linguistically motivated approach, rooted in the traditional grammatical analysis of Sanskrit. Our experiments show that the morphological parsing from our joint model outperforms standalone morphological parsers. We report state of the art results in morphological parsing, and in dependency parsing, both in standalone (with gold morphological tags) and joint morphosyntactic parsing setting. Amrith Krishna, Ashim Gupta, Deepak Garasangi, Pavankumar Satuluri, Pawan Goyal 0002 |
EMNLP (1) | 4 |
| 2020 | A Graph-Based Framework for Structured Prediction Tasks in SanskritabstractWe propose a framework using energy-based models for multiple structured prediction tasks in Sanskrit. Ours is an arc-factored model, similar to the graph-based parsing approaches, and we consider the tasks of word segmentation, morphological parsing, dependency parsing, syntactic linearization, and prosodification, a “prosody-level” task we introduce in this work. Ours is a search-based structured prediction framework, which expects a graph as input, where relevant linguistic information is encoded in the nodes, and the edges are then used to indicate the association between these nodes. Typically, the state-of-the-art models for morphosyntactic tasks in morphologically rich languages still rely on hand-crafted features for their performance. But here, we automate the learning of the feature function. The feature function so learned, along with the search space we construct, encode relevant linguistic information for the tasks we consider. This enables us to substantially reduce the training data requirements to as low as 10%, as compared to the data requirements for the neural state-of-the-art models. Our experiments in Czech and Sanskrit show the language-agnostic nature of the framework, where we train highly competitive models for both the languages. Moreover, our framework enables us to incorporate language-specific constraints to prune the search space and to filter the candidates during inference. We obtain significant improvements in morphosyntactic tasks for Sanskrit by incorporating language-specific constraints into the model. In all the tasks we discuss for Sanskrit, we either achieve state-of-the-art results or ours is the only data-driven solution for those tasks. Amrith Krishna, Bishal Santra, Ashim Gupta, Pavankumar Satuluri, Pawan Goyal 0002 |
Comput. Linguistics | 4 |
| 2019 | Poetry to Prose Conversion in Sanskrit as a Linearisation Task: A Case for Low-Resource LanguagesabstractThe word ordering in a Sanskrit verse is often not aligned with its corresponding prose order.Conversion of the verse to its corresponding prose helps in better comprehension of the construction.Owing to the resource constraints, we formulate this task as a word ordering (linearisation) task.In doing so, we completely ignore the word arrangement at the verse side.kāvya guru, the approach we propose, essentially consists of a pipeline of two pretraining steps followed by a seq2seq model.The first pretraining step learns task specific token embeddings from pretrained embeddings.In the next step, we generate multiple hypotheses for possible word arrangements of the input (Wang et al., 2018).We then use them as inputs to a neural seq2seq model for the final prediction.We empirically show that the hypotheses generated by our pretraining step result in predictions that consistently outperform predictions based on the original order in the verse.Overall, kāvya guru outperforms current state of the art models in linearisation for the poetry to prose conversion task in Sanskrit. Amrith Krishna, Vishnu Dutt Sharma, Bishal Santra, Aishik Chakraborty, Pavankumar Satuluri, Pawan Goyal 0002 |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2018 | Free as in Free Word Order: An Energy Based Model for Word Segmentation and Morphological Tagging in SanskritabstractAmrith Krishna, Bishal Santra, Sasi Prasanth Bandaru, Gaurav Sahu, Vishnu Dutt Sharma, Pavankumar Satuluri, Pawan Goyal. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2018. Amrith Krishna, Bishal Santra, Sasi Prasanth Bandaru, Gaurav Sahu, Vishnu Dutt Sharma, Pavankumar Satuluri, Pawan Goyal 0002 |
EMNLP | 6 |
| 2016 | Word Segmentation in Sanskrit Using Path Constrained Random WalksabstractIn Sanskrit, the phonemes at the word boundaries undergo changes to form new phonemes through a process called as sandhi. A fused sentence can be segmented into multiple possible segmentations. We propose a word segmentation approach that predicts the most semantically valid segmentation for a given sentence. We treat the problem as a query expansion problem and use the path-constrained random walks framework to predict the correct segments. Amrith Krishna, Bishal Santra, Pavankumar Satuluri, Sasi Prasanth Bandaru, Bhumi Faldu, Yajuvendra Singh, Pawan Goyal 0002 |
COLING | 3 |