Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

P. Balamurugan 0001

dblp:191/6663 · also Balamurugan Palaniappan · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
6as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0009-4193-5965ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 3 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 67% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 24% Optimization for machine learning · 9%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.622020
Learning with Operator-valued Kernels in Reproducing Kernel Krein Spaces · NeurIPS 2020
Large-Scale Elastic Net Regularized Linear Classification SVMs and Logistic Regression · ICDM 2013
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › kernel design
operator-valued kernel
0.412020
Learning with Operator-valued Kernels in Reproducing Kernel Krein Spaces · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel theory
reproducing kernel krein space
0.412020
Learning with Operator-valued Kernels in Reproducing Kernel Krein Spaces · NeurIPS 2020
Data mining
clustering
0.312017
Robust Discriminative Clustering with Sparse Regularizers · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Data mining
dimensionality reduction
0.312017
Robust Discriminative Clustering with Sparse Regularizers · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Data mining › clustering
discriminative clustering
0.312017
Robust Discriminative Clustering with Sparse Regularizers · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Data mining › clustering › high-dimensional clustering
sparse clustering
0.312017
Robust Discriminative Clustering with Sparse Regularizers · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Mathematical optimization › minimax optimization
convex-concave optimization
0.212016
Stochastic Variance Reduction Methods for Saddle-Point Problems · NIPS 2016
Mathematical optimization
minimax optimization
0.212016
Stochastic Variance Reduction Methods for Saddle-Point Problems · NIPS 2016
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
variance reduction
0.212016
Stochastic Variance Reduction Methods for Saddle-Point Problems · NIPS 2016
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
variational inequality
0.212016
Stochastic Variance Reduction Methods for Saddle-Point Problems · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
support vector machine
0.212013
Large-Scale Elastic Net Regularized Linear Classification SVMs and Logistic Regression · ICDM 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

representer theorem · 0.4OpMINRES algorithm · 0.4probabilistic model analysis · 0.3convex relaxation · 0.3non-uniform sampling · 0.2catalyst acceleration · 0.2SVRG · 0.2SAGA · 0.2dual coordinate descent · 0.2alternating optimization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Distributed accelerated gradient methods with restart under quadratic growth condition
Chhavi Sharma, Vishnu Narayanan, P. Balamurugan 0001
J. Glob. Optim.3
2020 Learning with Operator-valued Kernels in Reproducing Kernel Krein Spaces
abstract
Operator-valued kernels have shown promise in supervised learning problems with functional inputs and functional outputs. The crucial (and possibly restrictive) assumption of positive definiteness of operator-valued kernels has been instrumental in developing efficient algorithms. In this work, we consider operator-valued kernels which might not be necessarily positive definite. To tackle the indefiniteness of operator-valued kernels, we harness the machinery of Reproducing Kernel Krein Spaces (RKKS) of function-valued functions. A representer theorem is illustrated which yields a suitable loss stabilization problem for supervised learning with function-valued inputs and outputs. Analysis of generalization properties of the proposed framework is given. An iterative Operator based Minimum Residual (OpMINRES) algorithm is proposed for solving the loss stabilization problem. Experiments with indefinite operator-valued kernels on synthetic and real data sets demonstrate the utility of the proposed approach.
Akash Saha 0001, P. Balamurugan 0001
NeurIPS2
2018 Modeling Label Interactions in Multi-label Classification: A Multi-structure SVM Perspective
Anusha Kasinikota, P. Balamurugan 0001, Shirish K. Shevade
PAKDD (1)2
2017 Robust Discriminative Clustering with Sparse Regularizers
abstract
Clustering high-dimensional data often requires some form of dimensionality reduction, where clustered variables are separated from noise-looking variables. We cast this problem as finding a low-dimensional projection of the data which is well-clustered. This yields a one-dimensional projection in the simplest situation with two clusters, and extends naturally to a multi-label scenario for more than two clusters. In this paper, (a) we first show that this joint clustering and dimension reduction formulation is equivalent to previously proposed discriminative clustering frameworks, thus leading to convex relaxations of the problem; (b) we propose a novel sparse extension, which is still cast as a convex relaxation and allows estimation in higher dimensions; (c) we propose a natural extension for the multi-label scenario; (d) we provide a new theoretical analysis of the performance of these formulations with a simple probabilistic model, leading to scalings over the form $d=O(\sqrt{n})$ for the affine invariant case and $d=O(n)$ for the sparse case, where $n$ is the number of examples and $d$ the ambient dimension; and finally, (e) we propose an efficient iterative algorithm with running-time complexity proportional to $O(nd^2)$, improving on earlier algorithms for discriminative clustering with the square loss, which had quadratic complexity in the number of examples.
Nicolas Flammarion, P. Balamurugan 0001, Francis R. Bach
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2016 Stochastic Variance Reduction Methods for Saddle-Point Problems
abstract
We consider convex-concave saddle-point problems where the objective functions may be split in many components, and extend recent stochastic variance reduction methods (such as SVRG or SAGA) to provide the first large-scale linearly convergent algorithms for this class of problems which are common in machine learning. While the algorithmic extension is straightforward, it comes with challenges and opportunities: (a) the convex minimization analysis does not apply and we use the notion of monotone operators to prove convergence, showing in particular that the same algorithm applies to a larger class of problems, such as variational inequalities, (b) there are two notions of splits, in terms of functions, or in terms of partial derivatives, (c) the split does need to be done with convex-concave terms, (d) non-uniform sampling is key to an efficient algorithm, both in theory and practice, and (e) these incremental algorithms can be easily accelerated using a simple extension of the "catalyst" framework, leading to an algorithm which is always superior to accelerated batch algorithms.
P. Balamurugan 0001, Francis R. Bach
NIPS1
2016 Gaussian Process Pseudo-Likelihood Models for Sequence Labeling
P. K. Srijith, P. Balamurugan 0001, Shirish K. Shevade
ECML/PKDD (1)2
2016 ADMM for Training Sparse Structural SVMs with Augmented ℓ1 Regularizers
abstract
Structural Support Vector Machine (Structural SVM) is a powerful tool for classification problems involving structured outputs. This paper proposes a fast Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) for structural SVM with augmented ℓ1 regularizers. The designed ADMM alternately solves a sequence of three problems, one of which uses a fast sequential dual optimization method [3] developed for training ℓ2 regularized structural SVM. The other two problems have easy-to-compute closed-form solutions. The algorithm is simple to implement and extensive empirical experiments show that the proposed ADMM is faster than several competing methods on a number of benchmark sequence labeling datasets. In addition to showing the convergence of the proposed ADMM, this paper is the first to prove the global non-asymptotic convergence of the sequential dual optimization method to solve a sub-problem of the ADMM algorithm.
P. Balamurugan 0001, Anusha Posinasetty, Shirish K. Shevade
SDM1
2015 A Simple Label Switching Algorithm for Semisupervised Structural SVMs
abstract
In structured output learning, obtaining labeled data for real-world applications is usually costly, while unlabeled examples are available in abundance. Semisupervised structured classification deals with a small number of labeled examples and a large number of unlabeled structured data. In this work, we consider semisupervised structural support vector machines with domain constraints. The optimization problem, which in general is not convex, contains the loss terms associated with the labeled and unlabeled examples, along with the domain constraints. We propose a simple optimization approach that alternates between solving a supervised learning problem and a constraint matching problem. Solving the constraint matching problem is difficult for structured prediction, and we propose an efficient and effective label switching method to solve it. The alternating optimization is carried out within a deterministic annealing framework, which helps in effective constraint matching and avoiding poor local minima, which are not very useful. The algorithm is simple and easy to implement. Further, it is suitable for any structured output learning problem where exact inference is available. Experiments on benchmark sequence labeling data sets and a natural language parsing data set show that the proposed approach, though simple, achieves comparable generalization performance.
P. Balamurugan 0001, Shirish K. Shevade, S. Sundararajan
Neural Comput.1
2014 Scalable sequential alternating proximal methods for sparse structural SVMs and CRFs
P. Balamurugan 0001, Shirish K. Shevade, Ravindra Babu Tallamraju
Knowl. Inf. Syst.1
2013 Large-Scale Elastic Net Regularized Linear Classification SVMs and Logistic Regression
abstract
Elastic Net Regularizers have shown much promise in designing sparse classifiers for linear classification. In this work, we propose an alternating optimization approach to solve the dual problems of elastic net regularized linear classification Support Vector Machines (SVMs) and logistic regression (LR). One of the sub-problems turns out to be a simple projection. The other sub-problem can be solved using dual coordinate descent methods developed for non-sparse L2-regularized linear SVMs and LR, without altering their iteration complexity and convergence properties. Experiments on very large datasets indicate that the proposed dual coordinate descent - projection (DCD-P) methods are fast and achieve comparable generalization performance after the first pass through the data, with extremely sparse models.
P. Balamurugan 0001
ICDM1
2012 Efficient algorithms for linear summed error structural SVMs
abstract
Structural Support Vector Machines (SSVMs) have become a popular tool in machine learning for predicting structured objects like parse trees, Part-of-Speech (POS) label sequences and image segments. Various efficient algorithmic techniques have been proposed for training SSVMs for large datasets. The typical SSVM formulation contains a regularizer term and a composite loss term. The loss term is usually composed of the Linear Maximum Error (LME) associated with the training examples. Other alternatives for the loss term are yet to be explored for SSVMs. We formulate a new SSVM with Linear Summed Error (LSE) loss term and propose efficient algorithms to train the new SSVM formulation using primal cutting-plane method and sequential dual coordinate descent method. Numerical experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that the sequential dual coordinate descent method is faster than the cutting-plane method and reaches the steady-state generalization performance faster. It is thus a useful alternative for training SSVMs when linear summed error is used.
P. Balamurugan 0001, Shirish K. Shevade, Ravindra Babu Tallamraju
IJCNN1
2011 A Sequential Dual Method for Structural SVMs
abstract
In many real world prediction problems the output is a structured object like a sequence or a tree or a graph. Such problems range from natural language processing to computational biology or computer vision and have been tackled using algorithms, referred to as structured output learning algorithms. We consider the problem of structured classification. In the last few years, large margin classifiers like support vector machines (SVMs) have shown much promise for structured output learning. The related optimization problem is a convex quadratic program (QP) with a large number of constraints, which makes the problem intractable for large data sets. This paper proposes a fast sequential dual method (SDM) for structural SVMs. The method makes repeated passes over the training set and optimizes the dual variables associated with one example at a time. The use of additional heuristics makes the proposed method more efficient. We present an extensive empirical evaluation of the proposed method on several sequence learning problems. Our experiments on large data sets demonstrate that the proposed method is an order of magnitude faster than state of the art methods like cutting-plane method and stochastic gradient descent method (SGD). Further, SDM reaches steady state generalization performance faster than the SGD method. The proposed SDM is thus a useful alternative for large scale structured output learning.
Shirish K. Shevade, P. Balamurugan 0001, S. Sundararajan, S. Sathiya Keerthi
SDM2