Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yair Heller

dblp:191/6677 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Information theory · 83% Algorithms and data structures · 17%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
hypothesis testing
0.212016
Consistent Distribution-Free $K$-Sample and Independence Tests for Univariate Random Variables · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Learning theory › hypothesis testing
independence testing
0.212016
Consistent Distribution-Free $K$-Sample and Independence Tests for Univariate Random Variables · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Information theory › hypothesis testing
independence testing
0.212016
Multivariate tests of association based on univariate tests · NIPS 2016
Information theory › information measures
mutual information
0.212016
Consistent Distribution-Free $K$-Sample and Independence Tests for Univariate Random Variables · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Information theory › information measures › mutual information
mutual information estimation
0.212016
Consistent Distribution-Free $K$-Sample and Independence Tests for Univariate Random Variables · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Algorithms and data structures
polynomial-time algorithms
0.112016
Consistent Distribution-Free $K$-Sample and Independence Tests for Univariate Random Variables · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Algorithms and data structures
randomized algorithms
0.112016
Consistent Distribution-Free $K$-Sample and Independence Tests for Univariate Random Variables · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regularization · 0.5partition-based testing · 0.5univariate independence test · 0.2distribution-free test · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Multivariate tests of association based on univariate tests
abstract
For testing two vector random variables for independence, we propose testing whether the distance of one vector from an arbitrary center point is independent from the distance of the other vector from another arbitrary center point by a univariate test. We prove that under minimal assumptions, it is enough to have a consistent univariate independence test on the distances, to guarantee that the power to detect dependence between the random vectors increases to one with sample size. If the univariate test is distribution-free, the multivariate test will also be distribution-free. If we consider multiple center points and aggregate the center-specific univariate tests, the power may be further improved, and the resulting multivariate test may be distribution-free for specific aggregation methods (if the univariate test is distribution-free). We show that certain multivariate tests recently proposed in the literature can be viewed as instances of this general approach. Moreover, we show in experiments that novel tests constructed using our approach can have better power and computational time than competing approaches.
Ruth Heller, Yair Heller
NIPS2
2016 Consistent Distribution-Free $K$-Sample and Independence Tests for Univariate Random Variables
abstract
A popular approach for testing if two univariate random variables are statistically independent consists of partitioning the sample space into bins, and evaluating a test statistic on the binned data. The partition size matters, and the optimal partition size is data dependent. While for detecting simple relationships coarse partitions may be best, for detecting complex relationships a great gain in power can be achieved by considering finer partitions. We suggest novel consistent distribution-free tests that are based on summation or maximization aggregation of scores over all partitions of a fixed size. We show that our test statistics based on summation can serve as good estimators of the mutual information. Moreover, we suggest regularized tests that aggregate over all partition sizes, and prove those are consistent too. We provide polynomial-time algorithms, which are critical for computing the suggested test statistics efficiently. We show that the power of the regularized tests is excellent compared to existing tests, and almost as powerful as the tests based on the optimal (yet unknown in practice) partition size, in simulations as well as on a real data example.
Ruth Heller, Yair Heller, Shachar Kaufman, Barak Brill, Malka Gorfine
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2