Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jordy Thielen

dblp:191/6705 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
representational similarity analysis
0.212016
Brains on Beats · NIPS 2016
Audio and music processing › music information retrieval
music tagging
0.212016
Brains on Beats · NIPS 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.112016
Brains on Beats · NIPS 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › neural coding
neural representation
0.112016
Brains on Beats · NIPS 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

representational similarity analysis · 0.8deep neural network · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Exploring new territory II: Calibration-free decoding for ERP BCI
abstract
A brain-computer interface (BCI) typically requires a calibration phase to train its decoding model using supervised data, which can be time-consuming and impractical in real-world scenarios. This study eliminates the need for such calibration by investigating two zero-training approaches using a P300 event-related potential (ERP) dataset. We first evaluate reconvolution canonical correlation analysis (CCA) on ERP data, which marks its first application beyond its original domain of code-modulated visual evoked potentials (c-VEP). Second, we examine unsupervised mean-difference maximization (UMM), a recently proposed method for calibration-free ERP decoding. For both approaches, we assess performance under two conditions: instantaneous classification and cumulative learning across previously classified trials. Surprisingly, despite CCA originating from the c-VEP domain, our results demonstrate that both CCA and UMM achieve comparably high classification accuracy (97 % and 100 %) in decoding ERP data without requiring a calibration session. We highlight the unique advantages that each method offers and discuss implications for future research. By enabling reliable, calibration-free decoding, this work supports the development of more practical and accessible BCIs across various stimulus paradigms and applications. The potential integration of CCA and UMM presents a promising avenue to further enhance BCI usability.
Jordy Thielen, Michael Tangermann
SMC1
2016 Brains on Beats
abstract
We developed task-optimized deep neural networks (DNNs) that achieved state-of-the-art performance in different evaluation scenarios for automatic music tagging. These DNNs were subsequently used to probe the neural representations of music. Representational similarity analysis revealed the existence of a representational gradient across the superior temporal gyrus (STG). Anterior STG was shown to be more sensitive to low-level stimulus features encoded in shallow DNN layers whereas posterior STG was shown to be more sensitive to high-level stimulus features encoded in deep DNN layers.
Umut Güçlü, Jordy Thielen, Michael Hanke 0004, Marcel van Gerven
NIPS2