We study a two-dimensional generalization of the classical Bin Packing problem, denoted as 2D Demand Bin Packing. In this context, each bin is a horizontal timeline, and rectangular tasks (representing electric appliances or computational requirements) must be allocated into the minimum number of bins so that the sum of the heights of tasks at any point in time is at most a given constant capacity. We prove that simple variants of the problem are NP-hard to approximate within a factor better than 2, namely when tasks have short height and when they are squares, and provide best-possible approximation algorithms for them; we also present a simple 3-approximation for the general case. All our algorithms are based on a general framework that computes structured solutions for relatively large tasks, while including relatively small tasks on top via a generalization of the well-known First-Fit algorithm for Bin Packing.

We study the Maximum Independent Set of Rectangles (MISR) problem, where we are given a set of axis-parallel rectangles in the plane and the goal is to select a subset of non-overlapping rectangles of maximum cardinality. In a recent breakthrough, Mitchell [46] obtained the first constant-factor approximation algorithm for MISR. His algorithm achieves an approximation ratio of 10 and it is based on a dynamic program that intuitively recursively partitions the input plane into special polygons called corner-clipped rectangles (CCRs), without intersecting certain special horizontal line segments called fences. In this paper, we present a 3-approximation algorithm for MISR which is also based on a recursive partitioning scheme. First, we use a partition into a class of axis-parallel polygons with constant complexity each that are more general than CCRs. This allows us to provide an arguably simpler analysis and at the same time already improves the approximation ratio to 6. Then, using a more elaborate charging scheme and a recursive partitioning into general axis-parallel polygons with constant complexity, we improve our approximation ratio to 3. In particular, we construct a recursive partitioning based on more general fences which can be sequences of up to O(1) line segments each. This partitioning routine and our other new ideas may be useful for future work towards a PTAS for MISR.

In the Demand Strip Packing problem (DSP), we are given a time interval and a collection of tasks, each characterized by a processing time and a demand for a given resource (such as electricity, computational power, etc.). A feasible solution consists of a schedule of the tasks within the mentioned time interval. Our goal is to minimize the peak resource consumption, i.e. the maximum total demand of tasks executed at any point in time. It is known that DSP is NP-hard to approximate below a factor 3/2, and standard techniques for related problems imply a (polynomial-time) 2-approximation. Our main result is a (5/3+eps)-approximation algorithm for any constant eps>0. We also achieve best-possible approximation factors for some relevant special cases.

Given a set of n non-overlapping geometric objects, can we separate a constant fraction of them using straight-line cuts that extend from edge to edge? In 1996, Urrutia posed this question for compact convex objects. Pach and Tardos later refuted it for general line segments by constructing a family where any separable subfamily has size at most O (n^{log₃ 2}). However, for axis-parallel rectangles, they provided positive evidence, showing that an Ω(1/log n)-fraction can be separated. This problem naturally arises in geometric approximation algorithms. In particular, when restricting cuts to only orthogonal straight lines, known as a guillotine cut sequence, any bound on the separability ratio directly translates into a clean and simple dynamic programming for computing a maximum independent set of geometric objects. This paper focuses on the case when the objects are squares. For squares of arbitrary sizes, an Ω(1)-fraction can be separated (Abed et al., APPROX 2015), recently improved to 1/40 (and 1/160 ≈ 0.62% for the weighted case) (Khan and Pittu, APPROX 2020). We further improve this bound, showing that a 9/256 ≈ 3.51% can be separated for the weighted case. This result significantly narrows the possible range for squares to [3.51%, 50%]. The key to our improvement is a refined analysis of the existing framework.

In the Online Machine Covering problem jobs, defined by their sizes, arrive one by one and have to be assigned to m parallel and identical machines, with the goal of maximizing the load of the least-loaded machine. Unfortunately, the classical model allows only fairly pessimistic performance guarantees: The best possible deterministic ratio of m is achieved by the Greedy-strategy, and the best known randomized algorithm has competitive ratio Õ(√m) which cannot be improved by more than a logarithmic factor. Modern results try to mitigate this by studying semi-online models, where additional information about the job sequence is revealed in advance or extra resources are provided to the online algorithm. In this work we study the Machine Covering problem in the recently popular random-order model. Here no extra resources are present, but instead the adversary is weakened in that it can only decide upon the input set while jobs are revealed uniformly at random. It is particularly relevant to Machine Covering where lower bounds are usually associated to highly structured input sequences. We first analyze Graham’s Greedy-strategy in this context and establish that its competitive ratio decreases slightly to Θ(m/(log(m))) which is asymptotically tight. Then, as our main result, we present an improved Õ(∜m)-competitive algorithm for the problem. This result is achieved by exploiting the extra information coming from the random order of the jobs, using sampling techniques to devise an improved mechanism to distinguish jobs that are relatively large from small ones. We complement this result with a first lower bound showing that no algorithm can have a competitive ratio of O(log(m)/{log log(m)}) in the random-order model. This lower bound is achieved by studying a novel variant of the Secretary problem, which could be of independent interest.

Abstract In the k-Connectivity Augmentation Problem we are given a k-edge-connected graph and a set of additional edges called links. Our goal is to find a set of links of minimum size whose addition to the graph makes it (k + 1)-edge-connected. There is an approximation preserving reduction from the mentioned problem to the case k = 1 (a.k.a. the Tree Augmentation Problem or TAP) or k = 2 (a.k.a. the Cactus Augmentation Problem or CacAP). While several better-than-2 approximation algorithms are known for TAP, for CacAP only recently this barrier was breached (hence for k-Connectivity Augmentation in general). As a first step towards better approximation algorithms for CacAP, we consider the special case where the input cactus consists of a single cycle, the Cycle Augmentation Problem (CycAP). This apparently simple special case retains part of the hardness of the general case. In particular, we are able to show that it is APX-hard. In this paper we present a combinatorial $\left (\frac {3}{2}+\varepsilon \right )$ 3 2 + ε -approximation for CycAP, for any constant ε > 0. We also present an LP formulation with a matching integrality gap: this might be useful to address the general case of the problem.

In the Strip Packing problem, we are given a vertical half-strip [0,W]× [0,+∞) and a collection of open rectangles of width at most W. Our goal is to find an axis-aligned (non-overlapping) packing of such rectangles into the strip such that the maximum height OPT spanned by the packing is as small as possible. Strip Packing generalizes classical well-studied problems such as Makespan Minimization on identical machines (when rectangle widths are identical) and Bin Packing (when rectangle heights are identical). It has applications in manufacturing, scheduling and energy consumption in smart grids among others. It is NP-hard to approximate this problem within a factor (3/2-ε) for any constant ε > 0 by a simple reduction from the Partition problem. The current best approximation factor for Strip Packing is (5/3+ε) by Harren et al. [Computational Geometry '14], and it is achieved with a fairly complex algorithm and analysis. It seems plausible that Strip Packing admits a (3/2+ε)-approximation. We make progress in that direction by achieving such tight approximation guarantees for a special family of instances, which we call skewed instances. As standard in the area, for a given constant parameter δ > 0, we call large the rectangles with width at least δ W and height at least δ OPT, and skewed the remaining rectangles. If all the rectangles in the input are large, then one can easily compute the optimal packing in polynomial time (since the input can contain only a constant number of rectangles). We consider the complementary case where all the rectangles are skewed. This second case retains a large part of the complexity of the original problem; in particular, it is NP-hard to approximate within a factor (3/2-ε) and we provide an (almost) tight (3/2+ε)-approximation algorithm.

Online models that allow recourse can be highly effective in situations where classical online models are too pessimistic. One such problem is the online machine covering problem on identical machines. In this setting, jobs arrive one by one and must be assigned to machines with the objective of maximizing the minimum machine load. When a job arrives, we are allowed to reassign some jobs as long as their total size is (at most) proportional to the processing time of the arriving job. The proportionality constant is called the migration factor of the algorithm. Using a rounding procedure with useful structural properties for online packing and covering problems, we design first a simple (1.7 + ε)-competitive algorithm using a migration factor of O(1/ε), which maintains at every arrival a locally optimal solution with respect to the Jump neighborhood. After that, we present as our main contribution a more involved (4/3+ε)-competitive algorithm using a migration factor of Ō (1/ε 3 ). At every arrival, we run an adaptation of the Largest Processing Time first (LPT) algorithm. Since the new job can cause a complete change of the assignment of smaller jobs in both cases, a low migration factor is achieved by carefully exploiting the highly symmetric structure obtained by the rounding procedure.

We study the two-dimensional geometric knapsack problem, in which we are given a set of n axis-aligned rectangular items, each one with an associated profit, and an axis-aligned square knapsack. The goal is to find a (non-overlapping) packing of a maximum profit subset of items inside the knapsack (without rotating items). The best-known polynomial-time approximation factor for this problem (even just in the cardinality case) is 2+ε [Jansen and Zhang, SODA 2004]. In this article we present a polynomial-time 17/9+ε < 1.89-approximation, which improves to 558/325+ε < 1.72 in the cardinality case. Prior results pack items into a constant number of rectangular containers that are filled via greedy strategies. We deviate from this setting and show that there exists a large profit solution where items are packed into a constant number of containers plus one L-shaped region at the boundary of the knapsack containing narrow-high items and thin-wide items. These items may interact in complex manners at the corner of the L. The best-known approximation ratio for the subproblem in the L-shaped region is 2+ε (via a trivial reduction to one-dimensional knapsack); hence, as a second major result we present a PTAS for this case that we believe might be of broader utility. We also consider the variant with rotations, where items can be rotated by 90 degrees. Again, the best-known polynomial-time approximation factor (even for the cardinality case) is 2+ε [Jansen and Zhang, SODA 2004]. We present a polynomial-time (3/2+ε)-approximation for this setting, which improves to 4/3+ε in the cardinality case.

We study the strip packing problem, a classical packing problem which generalizes both bin packing and makespan minimization. Here we are given a set of axis-parallel rectangles in the two-dimensional plane and the goal is to pack them in a vertical strip of fixed width such that the height of the obtained packing is minimized. The packing must be non-overlapping and the rectangles cannot be rotated. A reduction from the partition problem shows that no approximation better than 3/2 is possible for strip packing in polynomial time (assuming P!=NP). Nadiradze and Wiese [SODA16] overcame this barrier by presenting a (7/5+epsilon)-approximation algorithm in pseudo-polynomial-time (PPT). As the problem is strongly NP-hard, it does not admit an exact PPT algorithm (though a PPT approximation scheme might exist). In this paper we make further progress on the PPT approximability of strip packing, by presenting a (4/3+epsilon)-approximation algorithm. Our result is based on a non-trivial repacking of some rectangles in the "empty space" left by the construction by Nadiradze and Wiese, and in some sense pushes their approach to its limit. Our PPT algorithm can be adapted to the case where we are allowed to rotate the rectangles by 90 degrees, achieving the same approximation factor and breaking the polynomial-time approximation barrier of 3/2 for the case with rotations as well.