Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rakshith Amarnath

dblp:191/9332 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 39% Electronic design automation · 30% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › reliability modeling
fault tree analysis
0.312018
Semi-automatic safety analysis and optimization · DAC 2018
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.312018
Semi-automatic safety analysis and optimization · DAC 2018
Embedded and real-time systems › critical systems
safety-critical systems
0.312018
Semi-automatic safety analysis and optimization · DAC 2018
Embedded and real-time systems › automotive embedded systems
automotive e/e architectures
0.112018
Semi-automatic safety analysis and optimization · DAC 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fault tree analysis · 0.3failure mode and effects analysis · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Semi-automatic safety analysis and optimization
abstract
The complexity of safety-critical E/E-systems within the automotive domain are continuously increasing. At the same time, functional safety standards such as the ISO 26262 prescribe analysis methods like the Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). Currently, these analysis methods are mainly performed manually and are often not consistent with an evolving system model.
Peter Munk, Andreas Abele, Eike Thaden, Arne Nordmann, Rakshith Amarnath, Markus Schweizer, Simon Burton 0001
DAC5
2018 A Model-Based Safety Analysis of Dependencies Across Abstraction Layers
Christoph Dropmann, Eike Thaden, Mario Trapp, Denis Uecker, Rakshith Amarnath, Leandro Avila da Silva, Peter Munk, Markus Schweizer, Matthias Jung 0001, Rasmus Adler
SAFECOMP5