VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jonathan Godwin
dblp:192/1490
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Graph learning · 44% Deep learning architectures and training · 25% Representation and self-supervised learning · 14% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 57% Computational science and engineering · 43% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
molecular property prediction |
0.8 | 2 | 2023 | Simple GNN Regularisation for 3D Molecular Property Prediction and Beyond · ICLR 2022 Pre-training via Denoising for Molecular Property Prediction · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
denoising training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Pre-training via Denoising for Molecular Property Prediction · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
pre-training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Pre-training via Denoising for Molecular Property Prediction · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simple GNN Regularisation for 3D Molecular Property Prediction and Beyond · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › molecular representation learning › molecular graph learning
molecular property prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simple GNN Regularisation for 3D Molecular Property Prediction and Beyond · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › scientific machine learning
neural surrogate model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learned Simulators for Turbulence · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simple GNN Regularisation for 3D Molecular Property Prediction and Beyond · ICLR 2022 |
Computational science and engineering › computational fluid dynamics
turbulence simulation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learned Simulators for Turbulence · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › graph neural network architecture
graph network |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networks · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
learned physical simulation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networks · ICML 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding
physical scene understanding |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networks · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph neural network · 2.3self-supervised pretraining · 1.3denoising autoencoder · 1.3regularization · 1.1neural operator · 1.1message passing · 0.4graph network · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Pre-training via Denoising for Molecular Property Prediction
Sheheryar Zaidi, Michael Schaarschmidt, James Martens, Hyunjik Kim, Yee Whye Teh, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Peter W. Battaglia, Razvan Pascanu, Jonathan Godwin |
ICLR | 9 |
| 2022 | Simple GNN Regularisation for 3D Molecular Property Prediction and Beyond
Jonathan Godwin, Michael Schaarschmidt, Alexander L. Gaunt, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Yulia Rubanova, Petar Velickovic, James Kirkpatrick, Peter W. Battaglia |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Learned Simulators for Turbulence
Kimberly L. Stachenfeld, Drummond B. Fielding, Dmitrii Kochkov, Miles D. Cranmer, Tobias Pfaff, Jonathan Godwin, Shirley Ho, Peter W. Battaglia, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2020 | Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph NetworksabstractHere we present a machine learning framework and model implementation that can learn to simulate a wide variety of challenging physical domains, involving fluids, rigid solids, and deformable materials interacting with one another. Our framework—which we term "Graph Network-based Simulators" (GNS)—represents the state of a physical system with particles, expressed as nodes in a graph, and computes dynamics via learned message-passing. Our results show that our model can generalize from single-timestep predictions with thousands of particles during training, to different initial conditions, thousands of timesteps, and at least an order of magnitude more particles at test time. Our model was robust to hyperparameter choices across various evaluation metrics: the main determinants of long-term performance were the number of message-passing steps, and mitigating the accumulation of error by corrupting the training data with noise. Our GNS framework advances the state-of-the-art in learned physical simulation, and holds promise for solving a wide range of complex forward and inverse problems. Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Jonathan Godwin, Tobias Pfaff, Rex Ying, Jure Leskovec, Peter W. Battaglia |
ICML | 2 |