Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Julian Schrittwieser

dblp:192/1707 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Reinforcement learning · 85% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 9% Learning theory · 7%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
2.142022
Planning in Stochastic Environments with a Learned Model · ICLR 2022
Procedural generalization by planning with self-supervised world models · ICLR 2022
Online and Offline Reinforcement Learning by Planning with a Learned Model · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning › model-based planning
planning with learned models
1.122022
Planning in Stochastic Environments with a Learned Model · ICLR 2022
Online and Offline Reinforcement Learning by Planning with a Learned Model · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
best response computation
0.612022
Approximate Exploitability: Learning a Best Response · IJCAI 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning
0.612022
Approximate Exploitability: Learning a Best Response · IJCAI 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.612022
Procedural generalization by planning with self-supervised world models · ICLR 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › game tree search
monte carlo tree search
0.612022
Policy improvement by planning with Gumbel · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning
0.612022
Approximate Exploitability: Learning a Best Response · IJCAI 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy improvement
0.612022
Policy improvement by planning with Gumbel · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › generalization in reinforcement learning
procedural generalization
0.612022
Procedural generalization by planning with self-supervised world models · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning
world model
0.612022
Procedural generalization by planning with self-supervised world models · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
planning and learning
0.512021
Learning and Planning in Complex Action Spaces · ICML 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
probabilistic planning
0.212022
Planning in Stochastic Environments with a Learned Model · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning
0.112021
Online and Offline Reinforcement Learning by Planning with a Learned Model · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

planning · 1.7worst-case performance approximation · 0.6self-supervised learning · 0.6monte carlo tree search · 0.6learned dynamics model · 0.6gumbel · 0.6ISMCTS-BR · 0.6sampled action subsets · 0.5policy iteration · 0.5muzero · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Procedural generalization by planning with self-supervised world models
Ankesh Anand, Jacob C. Walker, Yazhe Li, Eszter Vértes, Julian Schrittwieser, Sherjil Ozair, Theophane Weber, Jessica B. Hamrick
ICLR5
2022 Planning in Stochastic Environments with a Learned Model
Ioannis Antonoglou, Julian Schrittwieser, Sherjil Ozair, Thomas Hubert, David Silver 0001
ICLR2
2022 Policy improvement by planning with Gumbel
Ivo Danihelka, Arthur Guez, Julian Schrittwieser, David Silver 0001
ICLR3
2022 Approximate Exploitability: Learning a Best Response
abstract
Researchers have shown that neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples and subtle environment changes. The resulting errors can look like blunders to humans, eroding trust in these agents. In prior games research, agent evaluation often focused on the in-practice game outcomes. Such evaluation typically fails to evaluate robustness to worst-case outcomes. Computer poker research has examined how to assess such worst-case performance. Unfortunately, exact computation is infeasible with larger domains, and existing approximations are poker-specific. We introduce ISMCTS-BR, a scalable search-based deep reinforcement learning algorithm for learning a best response to an agent, approximating worst-case performance. We demonstrate the technique in several games against a variety of agents, including several AlphaZero-based agents. Supplementary material is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.09677.
Finbarr Timbers, Nolan Bard, Edward Lockhart, Marc Lanctot, Neil Burch, Julian Schrittwieser, Thomas Hubert, Michael H. Bowling
IJCAI7
2021 Learning and Planning in Complex Action Spaces
abstract
Many important real-world problems have action spaces that are high-dimensional, continuous or both, making full enumeration of all possible actions infeasible. Instead, only small subsets of actions can be sampled for the purpose of policy evaluation and improvement. In this paper, we propose a general framework to reason in a principled way about policy evaluation and improvement over such sampled action subsets. This sample-based policy iteration framework can in principle be applied to any reinforcement learning algorithm based upon policy iteration. Concretely, we propose Sampled MuZero, an extension of the MuZero algorithm that is able to learn in domains with arbitrarily complex action spaces by planning over sampled actions. We demonstrate this approach on the classical board game of Go and on two continuous control benchmark domains: DeepMind Control Suite and Real-World RL Suite.
Thomas Hubert, Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Mohammadamin Barekatain, Simon Schmitt, David Silver 0001
ICML2
2021 Online and Offline Reinforcement Learning by Planning with a Learned Model
abstract
Learning efficiently from small amounts of data has long been the focus of model-based reinforcement learning, both for the online case when interacting with the environment, and the offline case when learning from a fixed dataset. However, to date no single unified algorithm could demonstrate state-of-the-art results for both settings.In this work, we describe the Reanalyse algorithm, which uses model-based policy and value improvement operators to compute improved training targets for existing data points, allowing for efficient learning at data budgets varying by several orders of magnitude. We further show that Reanalyse can also be used to learn completely without environment interactions, as in the case of Offline Reinforcement Learning (Offline RL). Combining Reanalyse with the MuZero algorithm, we introduce MuZero Unplugged, a single unified algorithm for any data budget, including Offline RL. In contrast to previous work, our algorithm requires no special adaptations for the off-policy or Offline RL settings. MuZero Unplugged sets new state-of-the-art results for Atari in the standard 200 million frame online setting as well as in the RL Unplugged Offline RL benchmark.
Julian Schrittwieser, Thomas Hubert, Amol Mandhane, Mohammadamin Barekatain, Ioannis Antonoglou, David Silver 0001
NeurIPS1