Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Julian Schrittwieser
dblp:192/1707
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 85% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 9% Learning theory · 7% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
2.1 | 4 | 2022 | Planning in Stochastic Environments with a Learned Model · ICLR 2022 Procedural generalization by planning with self-supervised world models · ICLR 2022 Online and Offline Reinforcement Learning by Planning with a Learned Model · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning › model-based planning
planning with learned models |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Planning in Stochastic Environments with a Learned Model · ICLR 2022 Online and Offline Reinforcement Learning by Planning with a Learned Model · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
best response computation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Approximate Exploitability: Learning a Best Response · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Approximate Exploitability: Learning a Best Response · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Procedural generalization by planning with self-supervised world models · ICLR 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › game tree search
monte carlo tree search |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Policy improvement by planning with Gumbel · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Approximate Exploitability: Learning a Best Response · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy improvement |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Policy improvement by planning with Gumbel · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › generalization in reinforcement learning
procedural generalization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Procedural generalization by planning with self-supervised world models · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning
world model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Procedural generalization by planning with self-supervised world models · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
planning and learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning and Planning in Complex Action Spaces · ICML 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
probabilistic planning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Planning in Stochastic Environments with a Learned Model · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Online and Offline Reinforcement Learning by Planning with a Learned Model · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
planning · 1.7worst-case performance approximation · 0.6self-supervised learning · 0.6monte carlo tree search · 0.6learned dynamics model · 0.6gumbel · 0.6ISMCTS-BR · 0.6sampled action subsets · 0.5policy iteration · 0.5muzero · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Procedural generalization by planning with self-supervised world models
Ankesh Anand, Jacob C. Walker, Yazhe Li, Eszter Vértes, Julian Schrittwieser, Sherjil Ozair, Theophane Weber, Jessica B. Hamrick |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2022 | Planning in Stochastic Environments with a Learned Model
Ioannis Antonoglou, Julian Schrittwieser, Sherjil Ozair, Thomas Hubert, David Silver 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2022 | Policy improvement by planning with Gumbel
Ivo Danihelka, Arthur Guez, Julian Schrittwieser, David Silver 0001 |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2022 | Approximate Exploitability: Learning a Best ResponseabstractResearchers have shown that neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples and subtle environment changes. The resulting errors can look like blunders to humans, eroding trust in these agents. In prior games research, agent evaluation often focused on the in-practice game outcomes. Such evaluation typically fails to evaluate robustness to worst-case outcomes. Computer poker research has examined how to assess such worst-case performance. Unfortunately, exact computation is infeasible with larger domains, and existing approximations are poker-specific. We introduce ISMCTS-BR, a scalable search-based deep reinforcement learning algorithm for learning a best response to an agent, approximating worst-case performance. We demonstrate the technique in several games against a variety of agents, including several AlphaZero-based agents. Supplementary material is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.09677. Finbarr Timbers, Nolan Bard, Edward Lockhart, Marc Lanctot, Neil Burch, Julian Schrittwieser, Thomas Hubert, Michael H. Bowling |
IJCAI | 7 |
| 2021 | Learning and Planning in Complex Action SpacesabstractMany important real-world problems have action spaces that are high-dimensional, continuous or both, making full enumeration of all possible actions infeasible. Instead, only small subsets of actions can be sampled for the purpose of policy evaluation and improvement. In this paper, we propose a general framework to reason in a principled way about policy evaluation and improvement over such sampled action subsets. This sample-based policy iteration framework can in principle be applied to any reinforcement learning algorithm based upon policy iteration. Concretely, we propose Sampled MuZero, an extension of the MuZero algorithm that is able to learn in domains with arbitrarily complex action spaces by planning over sampled actions. We demonstrate this approach on the classical board game of Go and on two continuous control benchmark domains: DeepMind Control Suite and Real-World RL Suite. Thomas Hubert, Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Mohammadamin Barekatain, Simon Schmitt, David Silver 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Online and Offline Reinforcement Learning by Planning with a Learned ModelabstractLearning efficiently from small amounts of data has long been the focus of model-based reinforcement learning, both for the online case when interacting with the environment, and the offline case when learning from a fixed dataset. However, to date no single unified algorithm could demonstrate state-of-the-art results for both settings.In this work, we describe the Reanalyse algorithm, which uses model-based policy and value improvement operators to compute improved training targets for existing data points, allowing for efficient learning at data budgets varying by several orders of magnitude. We further show that Reanalyse can also be used to learn completely without environment interactions, as in the case of Offline Reinforcement Learning (Offline RL). Combining Reanalyse with the MuZero algorithm, we introduce MuZero Unplugged, a single unified algorithm for any data budget, including Offline RL. In contrast to previous work, our algorithm requires no special adaptations for the off-policy or Offline RL settings. MuZero Unplugged sets new state-of-the-art results for Atari in the standard 200 million frame online setting as well as in the RL Unplugged Offline RL benchmark. Julian Schrittwieser, Thomas Hubert, Amol Mandhane, Mohammadamin Barekatain, Ioannis Antonoglou, David Silver 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |