Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has become a prominent presence in classrooms, yet relatively little is known about how students actually engage with such tools in authentic school contexts. This study examines more than 17,000 messages across 1,512 conversations from 484 middle school students using a classroom-based generative AI writing tutor. We extracted linguistic, cognitive, and interactional features, reduced dimensionality with principal component analysis, and applied clustering to identify conversation and student-level patterns of engagement. Results revealed five conversation profiles—ranging from directive to reflective dialogue—and four student profiles, including collaborators, transactional tool users, independent thinkers, and chatters. These patterns aligned with both pedagogical intent and individual orientation, underscoring that student–AI dialogue is heterogeneous but systematic. Findings contribute empirical evidence to debates about generative AI in education and provide a methodological framework for analyzing human–AI interaction in learning analytics

Abstract As generative AI becomes ubiquitous, writers must decide if, when, and how to incorporate generative AI into their writing process. Educators must sort through their role in preparing students to make these decisions in a quickly evolving technological landscape. We created an AI-enabled writing tool that provides scaffolded use of a large language model as part of a research study on integrating generative AI into an upper division STEM writing-intensive course. Drawing on decades of research on integrating digital tools into instruction and writing research, we discuss the framework that drove our initial design considerations and instructional resources. We then share our findings from a year of design-based implementation research during the 2023–2024 academic year. Our original instruction framework identified the need for students to understand, access, prompt, corroborate, and incorporate the generative AI use effectively. In this paper, we explain the need for students to think first, before using AI, move through good enough prompting to agentic iterative prompting, and reflect on their use at the end. We also provide emerging best practices for instructors, beginning with identifying learning objectives, determining the appropriate AI role, revising the content, reflecting on the revised curriculum, and reintroducing learning as needed. We end with an indication of our future directions.

This study analyzed the relationship between computational thinking (CT) and coding attitudes of upper elementary students after exposure to a year-long CT curriculum. Using ordinary least squares regression and controlling for student demographics (i.e., gender and English Learner (EL) status), we found that CT skills were a significant factor in modeling coding attitudes, regardless of demographic controls. Interviews of the students unveiled an interaction between coding interest and social values in a debugging process.