Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Muyang He

dblp:192/6181 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
attention analysis
0.912025
Unveiling the Ignorance of MLLMs: Seeing Clearly, Answering Incorrectly · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Unveiling the Ignorance of MLLMs: Seeing Clearly, Answering Incorrectly · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.912025
Unveiling the Ignorance of MLLMs: Seeing Clearly, Answering Incorrectly · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering
0.912025
Unveiling the Ignorance of MLLMs: Seeing Clearly, Answering Incorrectly · CVPR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

visual attention refinement · 0.9paired positive and negative data construction · 0.9content guided refinement · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Unveiling the Ignorance of MLLMs: Seeing Clearly, Answering Incorrectly
abstract
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have displayed remarkable performance in multi-modal tasks, particularly in visual comprehension. However, we reveal that MLLMs often generate incorrect answers even when they understand the visual content. To this end, we manually construct a benchmark with 12 categories and design evaluation metrics that assess the degree of error in MLLM responses even when the visual content is seemingly understood. Based on this benchmark, we test 15 leading MLLMs and analyze the distribution of attention maps and logits of some MLLMs. Our investigation identifies two primary issues: 1) most instruction tuning datasets predominantly feature questions that "directly" relate to the visual content, leading to a bias in MLLMs’ responses to other indirect questions, and 2) MLLMs’ attention to visual tokens is notably lower than to system and question tokens. We further observe that attention scores between questions and visual tokens as well as the model’s confidence in the answers are lower in response to misleading questions than to straightforward ones. To address the first challenge, we introduce a paired positive and negative data construction pipeline to diversify the dataset. For the second challenge, we propose to enhance the model’s focus on visual content during decoding by refining the text and visual prompt. For the text prompt, we propose a content guided refinement strategy that performs preliminary visual content analysis to generate structured information before answering the question. Additionally, we employ a visual attention refinement strategy that highlights question-relevant visual tokens to increase the model’s attention to visual content that aligns with the question. Extensive experiments demonstrate that these challenges can be significantly mitigated with our proposed dataset and techniques.
Yexin Liu, Zhengyang Liang, Yueze Wang, Xianfeng Wu, Muyang He, Jian Li 0062, Zheng Liu 0011, Harry Yang, Ser-Nam Lim, Bo Zhao 0015
CVPR6
2024 Expanding Crack Segmentation Dataset with Crack Growth Simulation and Feature Space Diversity
abstract
In this paper, we address the significant challenge of data scarcity in the field of crack segmentation, a key aspect of structural health monitoring. To tackle this, we introduce the CrackGrowDiff framework, an innovative approach for expanding crack datasets. Utilizing a two-stage controllable generation process that combines a random walk algorithm and semantic diffusion models, our framework minimizes discrepancy of misalignment between synthetic data and original data while enhancing data informativeness. We further ensure the quality and informativeness of synthetic data through feature space diversity, employing a pre-trained Variational Autoencoder (VAE) for selection based on Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. Comparative experiments demonstrate CrackGrowDiff’s superiority over traditional data augmentation and GANs-based methods, making it a substantial advancement in addressing the data scarcity in crack segmentation tasks. A DEMO and related code will be made public: https://huggingface.co/spaces/QinLei086/Two-stage-SDM-for-crack-dataset-expending
Qin Lei, Rui Yang 0011, Rongzhen Li, Muyang He, Mianxiong Dong, Kaoru Ota
ICME5
2016 COR-Honeypot: Copy-On-Risk, Virtual Machine as Honeypot in the Cloud
abstract
This paper proposes Copy-On-Risk (COR) honeypot solution and implementation. Our prototype COR-Honeypot defends against attacks by creating on demand a personalized honeypot by cloning the victim and isolating the attack to the newly created honeypot. We measure the effectiveness of COR-Honeypot on resource usage and similarity of personalized honeypot to the victim. Results over different configurations of COR-Honeypot have demonstrated the benefits of the proposed solution.
Denis Lavrov, Veronique Blanchet, Muyang He, Abdolhossein Sarrafzadeh
CLOUD4