Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Abhiram Gnanasambandam
dblp:194/2550 · also Abhiram Gnanambandam
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-8220-7325ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
5 papers |
Image and video processing · 42% Computational photography and imaging · 37% Geometric modeling and processing · 21% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 67% Optimization for machine learning · 33% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational photography and imaging › single-photon imaging
quanta image sensor |
1.6 | 3 | 2024 | Quanta Video Restoration · ECCV (40) 2024 Image Classification in the Dark Using Quanta Image Sensors · ECCV (8) 2020 Dynamic Low-Light Imaging with Quanta Image Sensors · ECCV (21) 2020 |
Image and video processing
video restoration |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Quanta Video Restoration · ECCV (40) 2024 |
Image and video processing › image restoration › image denoising
depth denoising |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Graph-Based Depth Denoising & Dequantization for Point Cloud Enhancement · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2022 |
Image and video processing › image enhancement
depth map enhancement |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Graph-Based Depth Denoising & Dequantization for Point Cloud Enhancement · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2022 |
Geometric modeling and processing › point cloud processing
point cloud denoising |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Graph-Based Depth Denoising & Dequantization for Point Cloud Enhancement · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2022 |
Geometric modeling and processing
point cloud processing |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Graph-Based Depth Denoising & Dequantization for Point Cloud Enhancement · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2022 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Image Classification in the Dark Using Quanta Image Sensors · ECCV (8) 2020 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification › robust image classification
low-light image classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Image Classification in the Dark Using Quanta Image Sensors · ECCV (8) 2020 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | One Size Fits All: Can We Train One Denoiser for All Noise Levels? · ICML 2020 |
Computational photography and imaging
low-light imaging |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Dynamic Low-Light Imaging with Quanta Image Sensors · ECCV (21) 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quanta image sensor · 0.9minimax risk optimization · 0.9dual ascent · 0.9convex relaxation · 0.9maximum a posteriori estimation · 0.6graph signal processing · 0.6accelerated gradient descent · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Quanta Video Restoration
Prateek Chennuri, Yiheng Chi, Enze Jiang, G. M. Dilshan Godaliyadda, Abhiram Gnanasambandam, Hamid R. Sheikh, István Gyöngy, Stanley H. Chan |
ECCV (40) | 5 |
| 2022 | Graph-Based Depth Denoising & Dequantization for Point Cloud EnhancementabstractA 3D point cloud is typically constructed from depth measurements acquired by sensors at one or more viewpoints. The measurements suffer from both quantization and noise corruption. To improve quality, previous works denoise a point cloud a posteriori after projecting the imperfect depth data onto 3D space. Instead, we enhance depth measurements directly on the sensed images a priori, before synthesizing a 3D point cloud. By enhancing near the physical sensing process, we tailor our optimization to our depth formation model before subsequent processing steps that obscure measurement errors. Specifically, we model depth formation as a combined process of signal-dependent noise addition and non-uniform log-based quantization. The designed model is validated (with parameters fitted) using collected empirical data from a representative depth sensor. To enhance each pixel row in a depth image, we first encode intra-view similarities between available row pixels as edge weights via feature graph learning. We next establish inter-view similarities with another rectified depth image via viewpoint mapping and sparse linear interpolation. This leads to a maximum a posteriori (MAP) graph filtering objective that is convex and differentiable. We minimize the objective efficiently using accelerated gradient descent (AGD), where the optimal step size is approximated via Gershgorin circle theorem (GCT). Experiments show that our method significantly outperformed recent point cloud denoising schemes and state-of-the-art image denoising schemes in two established point cloud quality metrics. Xue Zhang 0008, Gene Cheung, Jiahao Pang, Yash Sanghvi, Abhiram Gnanasambandam, Stanley H. Chan |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 5 |
| 2020 | Dynamic Low-Light Imaging with Quanta Image Sensors
Yiheng Chi, Abhiram Gnanasambandam, Vladlen Koltun, Stanley H. Chan |
ECCV (21) | 2 |
| 2020 | Image Classification in the Dark Using Quanta Image Sensors
Abhiram Gnanasambandam, Stanley H. Chan |
ECCV (8) | 1 |
| 2020 | One Size Fits All: Can We Train One Denoiser for All Noise Levels?abstractWhen training an estimator such as a neural network for tasks like image denoising, it is often preferred to train one estimator and apply it to all noise levels. The de facto training protocol to achieve this goal is to train the estimator with noisy samples whose noise levels are uniformly distributed across the range of interest. However, why should we allocate the samples uniformly? Can we have more training samples that are less noisy, and fewer samples that are more noisy? What is the optimal distribution? How do we obtain such a distribution? The goal of this paper is to address this training sample distribution problem from a minimax risk optimization perspective. We derive a dual ascent algorithm to determine the optimal sampling distribution of which the convergence is guaranteed as long as the set of admissible estimators is closed and convex. For estimators with non-convex admissible sets such as deep neural networks, our dual formulation converges to a solution of the convex relaxation. We discuss how the algorithm can be implemented in practice. We evaluate the algorithm on linear estimators and deep networks. Abhiram Gnanasambandam, Stanley H. Chan |
ICML | 1 |