Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arsenii Ashukha
dblp:194/2865
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-9428-374XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 42% Efficient and distributed learning · 24% Trustworthy machine learning · 17% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Pitfalls of In-Domain Uncertainty Estimation and Ensembling in Deep Learning · ICLR 2020 Variance Networks: When Expectation Does Not Meet Your Expectations · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.6 | 2 | 2017 | Structured Bayesian Pruning via Log-Normal Multiplicative Noise · NIPS 2017 Variational Dropout Sparsifies Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.6 | 2 | 2017 | Structured Bayesian Pruning via Log-Normal Multiplicative Noise · NIPS 2017 Variational Dropout Sparsifies Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks |
0.5 | 2 | 2019 | The Deep Weight Prior · ICLR (Poster) 2019 Variational Dropout Sparsifies Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Pitfalls of In-Domain Uncertainty Estimation and Ensembling in Deep Learning · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | The Deep Weight Prior · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › prior modeling
weight prior |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | The Deep Weight Prior · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
monte carlo dropout |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Structured Bayesian Pruning via Log-Normal Multiplicative Noise · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparsity
network sparsification |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Variational Dropout Sparsifies Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
structured pruning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Structured Bayesian Pruning via Log-Normal Multiplicative Noise · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
variational dropout |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Variational Dropout Sparsifies Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bayesian inference · 0.7deep ensembles · 0.4variational dropout · 0.3truncated log-uniform prior · 0.3log-normal multiplicative noise · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Resolution-robust Large Mask Inpainting with Fourier ConvolutionsabstractModern image inpainting systems, despite the significant progress, often struggle with large missing areas, complex geometric structures, and high-resolution images. We find that one of the main reasons for that is the lack of an effective receptive field in both the inpainting network and the loss function. To alleviate this issue, we propose a new method called large mask inpainting (LaMa). LaMa is based on i) a new inpainting network architecture that uses fast Fourier convolutions (FFCs), which have the image-wide receptive field; ii) a high receptive field perceptual loss; iii) large training masks, which unlocks the potential of the first two components. Our inpainting network improves the state-of-the-art across a range of datasets and achieves excellent performance even in challenging scenarios, e.g. completion of periodic structures. Our model generalizes surprisingly well to resolutions that are higher than those seen at train time, and achieves this at lower parameter&time costs than the competitive baselines. The code is available at https://github.com/saic-mdal/lama. Roman Suvorov, Elizaveta Logacheva, Anton Mashikhin, Anastasia Remizova, Arsenii Ashukha, Alexey Silvestrov, Naejin Kong, Harshith Goka, Kiwoong Park, Victor S. Lempitsky |
WACV | 5 |
| 2020 | Pitfalls of In-Domain Uncertainty Estimation and Ensembling in Deep Learning
Arsenii Ashukha, Alexander Lyzhov, Dmitry Molchanov, Dmitry P. Vetrov |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2020 | Greedy Policy Search: A Simple Baseline for Learnable Test-Time AugmentationabstractTest-time data augmentation—averaging the predictions of a machine learning model across multiple augmented samples of data—is a widely used technique that improves the predictive performance. While many advanced learnable data augmentation techniques have emerged in recent years, they are focused on the training phase. Such techniques are not necessarily optimal for test-time augmentation and can be outperformed by a policy consisting of simple crops and flips. The primary goal of this paper is to demonstrate that test-time augmentation policies can be successfully learned too. We introduce greedy policy search (GPS), a simple but high-performing method for learning a policy of test-time augmentation. We demonstrate that augmentation policies learned with GPS achieve superior predictive performance on image classification problems, provide better in-domain uncertainty estimation, and improve the robustness to domain shift. Alexander Lyzhov, Yuliya Molchanova, Arsenii Ashukha, Dmitry Molchanov, Dmitry P. Vetrov |
UAI | 3 |
| 2019 | The Deep Weight Prior
Andrei Atanov, Arsenii Ashukha, Kirill Struminsky, Dmitry P. Vetrov, Max Welling |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2019 | Variance Networks: When Expectation Does Not Meet Your Expectations
Kirill Neklyudov, Dmitry Molchanov, Arsenii Ashukha, Dmitry P. Vetrov |
ICLR (Poster) | 3 |
| 2019 | Uncertainty Estimation via Stochastic Batch Normalization
Andrei Atanov, Arsenii Ashukha, Dmitry Molchanov, Kirill Neklyudov, Dmitry P. Vetrov |
ISNN (1) | 2 |
| 2017 | Variational Dropout Sparsifies Deep Neural NetworksabstractWe explore a recently proposed Variational Dropout technique that provided an elegant Bayesian interpretation to Gaussian Dropout. We extend Variational Dropout to the case when dropout rates are unbounded, propose a way to reduce the variance of the gradient estimator and report first experimental results with individual dropout rates per weight. Interestingly, it leads to extremely sparse solutions both in fully-connected and convolutional layers. This effect is similar to automatic relevance determination effect in empirical Bayes but has a number of advantages. We reduce the number of parameters up to 280 times on LeNet architectures and up to 68 times on VGG-like networks with a negligible decrease of accuracy. Dmitry Molchanov, Arsenii Ashukha, Dmitry P. Vetrov |
ICML | 2 |
| 2017 | Structured Bayesian Pruning via Log-Normal Multiplicative NoiseabstractDropout-based regularization methods can be regarded as injecting random noise with pre-defined magnitude to different parts of the neural network during training. It was recently shown that Bayesian dropout procedure not only improves gener- alization but also leads to extremely sparse neural architectures by automatically setting the individual noise magnitude per weight. However, this sparsity can hardly be used for acceleration since it is unstructured. In the paper, we propose a new Bayesian model that takes into account the computational structure of neural net- works and provides structured sparsity, e.g. removes neurons and/or convolutional channels in CNNs. To do this we inject noise to the neurons outputs while keeping the weights unregularized. We establish the probabilistic model with a proper truncated log-uniform prior over the noise and truncated log-normal variational approximation that ensures that the KL-term in the evidence lower bound is com- puted in closed-form. The model leads to structured sparsity by removing elements with a low SNR from the computation graph and provides significant acceleration on a number of deep neural architectures. The model is easy to implement as it can be formulated as a separate dropout-like layer. Kirill Neklyudov, Dmitry Molchanov, Arsenii Ashukha, Dmitry P. Vetrov |
NIPS | 3 |