Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Lorna Stewart

dblp:194/4151 · also L. Stewart Burlingham, Lorna K. Stewart · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
30ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 29 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
5 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 84% Computational geometry · 10% Algorithms and data structures · 6%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph algorithms
graph search
0.021999
Linear Time Algorithms for Dominating Pairs in Asteroidal Triple-free Graphs · SIAM J. Comput. 1999
LBFS Orderings and Cocomparability Graphs · SODA 1999
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph classes
0.021999
LBFS Orderings and Cocomparability Graphs · SODA 1999
The Ultimate Interval Graph Recognition Algorithm? (Extended Abstract) · SODA 1998
Graph algorithms and graph theory › metric graph theory › graph distance
dominating pair
0.021999
Linear Time Algorithms for Dominating Pairs in Asteroidal Triple-free Graphs · SIAM J. Comput. 1999
Linear Time Algorithms for Dominating Pairs in Asteroidal Triple-free Graphs · ICALP 1995
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph classes › perfect graph
cocomparability graphs
0.011999
LBFS Orderings and Cocomparability Graphs · SODA 1999
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph classes
graph recognition
0.011998
The Ultimate Interval Graph Recognition Algorithm? (Extended Abstract) · SODA 1998
Computational geometry › intersection graphs
interval graphs
0.011998
The Ultimate Interval Graph Recognition Algorithm? (Extended Abstract) · SODA 1998
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph classes
recognition algorithms
0.011985
A Linear Recognition Algorithm for Cographs · SIAM J. Comput. 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear-time algorithm · 0.0graph ordering · 0.0constructive proof · 0.0graph algorithms · 0.0cotree construction · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 On polygon numbers of circle graphs and distance hereditary graphs
Lorna Stewart, Richard Anthony Valenzano
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2016 Games on interval and permutation graph representations
Jessica A. Enright, Lorna Stewart
Theor. Comput. Sci.2
2014 On List Coloring and List Homomorphism of Permutation and Interval Graphs
abstract
List coloring is an NP-complete decision problem even if the total number of colors is three. It is hard even on planar bipartite graphs. We give a polynomial-time algorithm for solving list coloring of permutation graphs with a bounded total number of colors. More generally, we give a polynomial-time algorithm that solves the list-homomorphism problem to any fixed target graph for a large class of input graphs, including all permutation and interval graphs.
Jessica A. Enright, Lorna Stewart, Gábor Tardos
SIAM J. Discret. Math.2
2009 DP-Complete Problems Derived from Extremal NP-Complete Properties
Joseph C. Culberson, Lorna Stewart
MFCS3
2009 The LBFS Structure and Recognition of Interval Graphs
abstract
A graph is an interval graph if it is the intersection graph of intervals on a line. Interval graphs are known to be the intersection of chordal graphs and asteroidal triple–free graphs, two families where the well-known lexicographic breadth first search (LBFS) plays an important algorithmic and structural role. In this paper we show that interval graphs have a very rich LBFS structure and that by exploiting this structure one can design a linear time, easily implementable, interval graph recognition algorithm.
Derek G. Corneil, Stephan Olariu, Lorna Stewart
SIAM J. Discret. Math.3
2007 Subtree filament graphs are subtree overlap graphs
Jessica A. Enright, Lorna Stewart
Inf. Process. Lett.2
2006 Approximating the minimum clique cover and other hard problems in subtree filament graphs
J. Mark Keil, Lorna Stewart
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2006 Linear Orderings of Subfamilies of AT-Free Graphs
abstract
Asteroidal triple free (AT‐free) graphs have been introduced as a generalization of interval graphs, since interval graphs are exactly the chordal AT‐free graphs. While for interval graphs it is obvious that there is always a linear ordering of the vertices, such that for each triple of independent vertices the middle one intercepts any path between the remaining vertices of the triple, it is not clear that such an ordering exists for AT‐free graphs in general. In this paper we study graphs that are defined by enforcing such an ordering. In particular, we introduce two subfamilies of AT‐free graphs, namely, path orderable graphs and strong asteroid free graphs. Path orderable graphs are defined by a linear ordering of the vertices that is a natural generalization of the ordering that characterizes cocomparability graphs. On the other hand, motivation for the definition of strong asteroid free graphs comes from the fundamental work of Gallai on comparability graphs. We show that cocomparability graphs $\subset$ path orderable graphs $\subset$ strong asteroid free graphs $\subset$ AT‐free graphs. In addition, we settle the recognition question for the two new classes by proving that recognizing path orderable graphs is NP‐complete, whereas the recognition problem for strong asteroid free graphs can be solved in polynomial time.
Derek G. Corneil, Ekkehard Köhler, Stephan Olariu, Lorna Stewart
SIAM J. Discret. Math.4
2003 Maximum independent set and maximum clique algorithms for overlap graphs
Eowyn Cenek, Lorna Stewart
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2002 Approximating Bandwidth by Mixing Layouts of Interval Graphs
abstract
We examine the bandwidth problem in circular-arc graphs, chordal graphs with a bounded number of leaves in the clique tree, and k-polygon graphs (fixed k). We show that all of these graph classes admit efficient approximation algorithms which are based on exact or approximate bandwidth layouts of related interval graphs. Specifically, we obtain a bandwidth approximation algorithm for circular-arc graphs that executes in O(n log 2 n ) time and has performance ratio 2, which is the best possible performance ratio of any polynomial time bandwidth approximation algorithm for circular-arc graphs. For chordal graphs with at most k leaves in the clique tree, we obtain a performance ratio of 2k in O(k(n+m)) time, and our algorithm for k-polygon graphs has performance ratio 2k 2 and runs in time O(n 3 ).
Dieter Kratsch, Lorna Stewart
SIAM J. Discret. Math.2
2001 On Subfamilies of AT-Free Graphs
Ekkehard Köhler, Derek G. Corneil, Stephan Olariu, Lorna Stewart
WG4
2000 Biconvex graphs: ordering and algorithms
Nesrine Abbas, Lorna Stewart
Discret. Appl. Math.2
1999 LBFS Orderings and Cocomparability Graphs
Derek G. Corneil, Stephan Olariu, Lorna Stewart
SODA3
1999 Approximating Bandwidth by Mixing Layouts of Interval Graphs
Dieter Kratsch, Lorna Stewart
STACS2
1999 Clustering Bipartite, Chordal Graphs: Complexity, Sequential, Parallel Algorithms
Nesrine Abbas, Lorna Stewart
Discret. Appl. Math.2
1999 Linear Time Algorithms for Dominating Pairs in Asteroidal Triple-free Graphs
abstract
An independent set of three vertices is called an asteroidal triple if between each pair in the triple there exists a path that avoids the neighborhood of the third. A graph is asteroidal triple-free (AT-free) if it contains no asteroidal triple. The motivation for this investigation is provided, in part, by the fact that AT-free graphs offer a common generalization of interval, permutation, trapezoid, and cocomparability graphs. Previously, the authors have given an existential proof of the fact that every connected AT-free graph contains a dominating pair, that is, a pair of vertices such that every path joining them is a dominating set in the graph. The main contribution of this paper is a constructive proof of the existence of dominating pairs in connected AT-free graphs. The resulting simple algorithm, based on the well-known lexicographic breadth-first search, can be implemented to run in time linear in the size of the input, whereas the best algorithm previously known for this problem has complexity O(|V| 3 ) for input graph G=(V,E). In addition, we indicate how our algorithm can be extended to find, in time linear in the size of the input, all dominating pairs in a connected AT-free graph with diameter greater than 3. A remarkable feature of the extended algorithm is that, even though there may be O(|V| 2 ) dominating pairs, the algorithm can compute and represent them in linear time.
Derek G. Corneil, Stephan Olariu, Lorna Stewart
SIAM J. Comput.3
1998 The Ultimate Interval Graph Recognition Algorithm? (Extended Abstract)
Derek G. Corneil, Stephan Olariu, Lorna Stewart
SODA3
1997 Total Domination and Transformation
Dieter Kratsch, Lorna Stewart
Inf. Process. Lett.2
1997 Asteroidal Triple-Free Graphs
abstract
An independent set of three vertices such that each pair is joined by a path that avoids the neighborhood of the third is called an asteroidal triple. A graph is asteroidal triple-free (AT-free) if it contains no asteroidal triples. The motivation for this investigation was provided, in part, by the fact that the AT-free graphs provide a common generalization of interval, permutation, trapezoid, and cocomparability graphs. The main contribution of this work is to investigate and reveal fundamental structural properties of AT-free graphs. Specifically, we show that every connected AT-free graph contains a dominating pair, that is, a pair of vertices such that every path joining them is a dominating set in the graph. We then provide characterizations of AT-free graphs in terms of dominating pairs and minimal triangulations. Subsequently, we state and prove a decomposition theorem for AT-free graphs. An assortment of other properties of AT-free graphs is also provided. These properties generalize known structural properties of interval, permutation, trapezoid, and cocomparability graphs.
Derek G. Corneil, Stephan Olariu, Lorna Stewart
SIAM J. Discret. Math.3
1995 Linear Time Algorithms for Dominating Pairs in Asteroidal Triple-free Graphs
Derek G. Corneil, Stephan Olariu, Lorna Stewart
ICALP3
1995 Computing a Dominating Pair in an Asteroidal Triple-free Graph in Linear Time
Derek G. Corneil, Stephan Olariu, Lorna Stewart
WADS3
1995 A Linear Time Algorithm to Compute a Dominating Path in an AT-Free Graph
Derek G. Corneil, Stephan Olariu, Lorna Stewart
Inf. Process. Lett.3
1994 On Cocolourings and Cochromatic Numbers of Graphs
John G. Gimbel, Dieter Kratsch, Lorna Stewart
Discret. Appl. Math.3
1993 Asteroidal Triple-Free Graphs
Derek G. Corneil, Stephan Olariu, Lorna Stewart
WG3
1993 Independence and domination in Polygon Graphs
Ehab S. Elmallah, Lorna Stewart
Discret. Appl. Math.2
1993 Domination on Cocomparability Graphs
abstract
The authors determine the algorithmic complexity of domination and variants on cocomparability graphs, a class of perfect graphs containing both the interval and the permutation graphs. Minimum dominating, total dominating, connected dominating, and independent dominating sets can be constructed in polynomial time. On the other hand, DOMINATING CLIQUE and MINIMUM DOMINATING CLIQUE remain NP-complete on cocomparability graphs.
Dieter Kratsch, Lorna Stewart
SIAM J. Discret. Math.2
1992 Complexity results for well-covered graphs
abstract
Abstract A graph with n vertices is well covered if every maximal independent set is a maximum independent set and very well covered if every maximal independent set has size n/2. In this work, we study these graphs from an algorithmic complexity point of view. We show that well‐covered graph recognition is co‐NP‐complete and that several other problems are NP‐complete for well‐covered graphs. A number of these problems remain NP‐complete on very well covered graphs, while some admit polynomial time solutions for the smaller class. For both families, the isomorphism problem is as hard as general graph isomorphism.
Ramesh S. Sankaranarayana, Lorna Stewart
Networks2
1987 Bipartite permutation graphs
Jeremy P. Spinrad, Andreas Brandstädt, Lorna Stewart
Discret. Appl. Math.3
1985 A Linear Recognition Algorithm for Cographs
abstract
Cographs are the graphs formed from a single vertex under the closure of the operations of union and complement. Another characterization of cographs is that they are the undirected graphs with no induced paths on four vertices. Cographs arise naturally in such application areas as examination scheduling and automatic clustering of index terms. Furthermore, it is known that cographs have a unique tree representation called a cotree. Using the cotree it is possible to design very fast polynomial time algorithms for problems which are intractable for graphs in general. Such problems include chromatic number, clique determination, clustering, minimum weight domination, isomorphism, minimum fill-in and Hamiltonicity. In this paper we present a linear time algorithm for recognizing cographs and constructing their cotree representation.
Derek G. Corneil, Yehoshua Perl, Lorna Stewart
SIAM J. Comput.3
1981 Complement reducible graphs
Derek G. Corneil, H. Lerchs, Lorna Stewart
Discret. Appl. Math.3