Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Achille Aknin

dblp:194/4242 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
pattern mining
0.212016
Direct Mining of Subjectively Interesting Relational Patterns · ICDM 2016
Data mining › pattern mining › structured pattern mining
relational pattern mining
0.212016
Direct Mining of Subjectively Interesting Relational Patterns · ICDM 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

constraint programming · 0.2branch-and-bound search · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Direct Mining of Subjectively Interesting Relational Patterns
abstract
Data is typically complex and relational. Therefore, the development of relational data mining methods is an increasingly active topic of research. Recent work has resulted in new formalisations of patterns in relational data and in a way to quantify their interestingness in a subjective manner, taking into account the data analyst's prior beliefs about the data. Yet, a scalable algorithm to find such most interesting patterns is lacking. We introduce a new algorithm based on two notions: (1) the use of Constraint Programming, which results in a notably shorter development time, faster runtimes, and more flexibility for extensions such as branch-and-bound search, and (2), the direct search for the most interesting patterns only, instead of exhaustive enumeration of patterns before ranking them. Through empirical evaluation, we find that our novel bounds yield speedups up to several orders of magnitude, especially on dense data with a simple schema. This makes it possible to mine the most subjectively-interesting relational patterns present in databases where this was previously impractical or impossible.
Tias Guns, Achille Aknin, Jefrey Lijffijt, Tijl De Bie
ICDM2