Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Achille Aknin
dblp:194/4242
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Direct Mining of Subjectively Interesting Relational Patterns · ICDM 2016 |
Data mining › pattern mining › structured pattern mining
relational pattern mining |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Direct Mining of Subjectively Interesting Relational Patterns · ICDM 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
constraint programming · 0.2branch-and-bound search · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Direct Mining of Subjectively Interesting Relational PatternsabstractData is typically complex and relational. Therefore, the development of relational data mining methods is an increasingly active topic of research. Recent work has resulted in new formalisations of patterns in relational data and in a way to quantify their interestingness in a subjective manner, taking into account the data analyst's prior beliefs about the data. Yet, a scalable algorithm to find such most interesting patterns is lacking. We introduce a new algorithm based on two notions: (1) the use of Constraint Programming, which results in a notably shorter development time, faster runtimes, and more flexibility for extensions such as branch-and-bound search, and (2), the direct search for the most interesting patterns only, instead of exhaustive enumeration of patterns before ranking them. Through empirical evaluation, we find that our novel bounds yield speedups up to several orders of magnitude, especially on dense data with a simple schema. This makes it possible to mine the most subjectively-interesting relational patterns present in databases where this was previously impractical or impossible. Tias Guns, Achille Aknin, Jefrey Lijffijt, Tijl De Bie |
ICDM | 2 |