Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jihun Choi 0002

dblp:194/7554-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Language models and text generation · 58% Information extraction and text analysis · 20% Deep learning architectures and training · 16%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automata and formal languages · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › sentence pair modeling
natural language inference
0.932019
A Cross-Sentence Latent Variable Model for Semi-Supervised Text Sequence Matching · ACL (1) 2019
Dynamic Compositionality in Recursive Neural Networks with Structure-Aware Tag Representations · AAAI 2019
Learning to Compose Task-Specific Tree Structures · AAAI 2018
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis
0.522019
Dynamic Compositionality in Recursive Neural Networks with Structure-Aware Tag Representations · AAAI 2019
Learning to Compose Task-Specific Tree Structures · AAAI 2018
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › pre-trained language model › knowledge probing
linguistic knowledge probing
0.412020
Are Pre-trained Language Models Aware of Phrases? Simple but Strong Baselines for Grammar Induction · ICLR 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model
0.412020
Are Pre-trained Language Models Aware of Phrases? Simple but Strong Baselines for Grammar Induction · ICLR 2020
Automata and formal languages
grammatical inference
0.412020
Are Pre-trained Language Models Aware of Phrases? Simple but Strong Baselines for Grammar Induction · ICLR 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text similarity
paraphrase identification
0.412019
A Cross-Sentence Latent Variable Model for Semi-Supervised Text Sequence Matching · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
sequence matching
0.412019
A Cross-Sentence Latent Variable Model for Semi-Supervised Text Sequence Matching · ACL (1) 2019
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
0.312018
Learning to Compose Task-Specific Tree Structures · AAAI 2018
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text representation
0.312018
Learning to Compose Task-Specific Tree Structures · AAAI 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network › LSTM
tree-structured LSTM
0.312018
Learning to Compose Task-Specific Tree Structures · AAAI 2018
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › compositional representation
compositional representation learning
0.112019
Dynamic Compositionality in Recursive Neural Networks with Structure-Aware Tag Representations · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.112019
A Cross-Sentence Latent Variable Model for Semi-Supervised Text Sequence Matching · ACL (1) 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probing · 0.9structure-aware tag representation · 0.4semantic constraints · 0.4recursive neural network · 0.4latent variable model · 0.4autoencoding · 0.4Tree-LSTM · 0.4straight-through estimator · 0.3gumbel-softmax · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Are Pre-trained Language Models Aware of Phrases? Simple but Strong Baselines for Grammar Induction
Taeuk Kim, Jihun Choi 0002, Daniel Edmiston, Sang-goo Lee
ICLR2
2019 Dynamic Compositionality in Recursive Neural Networks with Structure-Aware Tag Representations
abstract
Most existing recursive neural network (RvNN) architectures utilize only the structure of parse trees, ignoring syntactic tags which are provided as by-products of parsing. We present a novel RvNN architecture that can provide dynamic compositionality by considering comprehensive syntactic information derived from both the structure and linguistic tags. Specifically, we introduce a structure-aware tag representation constructed by a separate tag-level tree-LSTM. With this, we can control the composition function of the existing wordlevel tree-LSTM by augmenting the representation as a supplementary input to the gate functions of the tree-LSTM. In extensive experiments, we show that models built upon the proposed architecture obtain superior or competitive performance on several sentence-level tasks such as sentiment analysis and natural language inference when compared against previous tree-structured models and other sophisticated neural models.
Taeuk Kim, Jihun Choi 0002, Daniel Edmiston, Sanghwan Bae, Sang-goo Lee
AAAI2
2019 A Cross-Sentence Latent Variable Model for Semi-Supervised Text Sequence Matching
abstract
We present a latent variable model for predicting the relationship between a pair of text sequences.Unlike previous auto-encodingbased approaches that consider each sequence separately, our proposed framework utilizes both sequences within a single model by generating a sequence that has a given relationship with a source sequence.We further extend the cross-sentence generating framework to facilitate semi-supervised training.We also define novel semantic constraints that lead the decoder network to generate semantically plausible and diverse sequences.We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model from quantitative and qualitative experiments, while achieving state-of-the-art results on semi-supervised natural language inference and paraphrase identification.
Jihun Choi 0002, Taeuk Kim, Sang-goo Lee
ACL (1)1
2019 Cell-aware Stacked LSTMs for Modeling Sentences
abstract
We propose a method of stacking multiple long short-term memory (LSTM) layers for modeling sentences. In contrast to the conventional stacked LSTMs where only hidden states are fed as input to the next layer, the suggested architecture accepts both hidden and memory cell states of the preceding layer and fuses information from the left and the lower context using the soft gating mechanism of LSTMs. Thus the architecture modulates the amount of information to be delivered not only in horizontal recurrence but also in vertical connections, from which useful features extracted from lower layers are effectively conveyed to upper layers. We dub this architecture Cell-aware Stacked LSTM (CAS-LSTM) and show from experiments that our models bring significant performance gain over the standard LSTMs on benchmark datasets for natural language inference, paraphrase detection, sentiment classification, and machine translation. We also conduct extensive qualitative analysis to understand the internal behavior of the suggested approach.
Jihun Choi 0002, Taeuk Kim, Sang-goo Lee
ACML1
2018 Learning to Compose Task-Specific Tree Structures
abstract
For years, recursive neural networks (RvNNs) have been shown to be suitable for representing text into fixed-length vectors and achieved good performance on several natural language processing tasks. However, the main drawback of RvNNs is that they require structured input, which makes data preparation and model implementation hard. In this paper, we propose Gumbel Tree-LSTM, a novel tree-structured long short-term memory architecture that learns how to compose task-specific tree structures only from plain text data efficiently. Our model uses Straight-Through Gumbel-Softmax estimator to decide the parent node among candidates dynamically and to calculate gradients of the discrete decision. We evaluate the proposed model on natural language inference and sentiment analysis, and show that our model outperforms or is at least comparable to previous models. We also find that our model converges significantly faster than other models.
Jihun Choi 0002, Kang Min Yoo, Sang-goo Lee
AAAI1
2017 Partition-Based Clustering with Sliding Windows for Data Streams
Jonghem Youn, Jihun Choi 0002, Junho Shim, Sang-goo Lee
DASFAA (2)2
2016 A grapheme-level approach for constructing a Korean morphological analyzer without linguistic knowledge
abstract
Morphological analysis is an essential step for processing the Korean language, due to highly agglutinative properties of the language. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for constructing a Korean morphological analyzer that can capture linguistic properties using graphemes as basic processing units. Since our model does not utilize prior linguistic knowledge, the model can be applied to other training corpora with ease. Our model performs morphological analysis through two consecutive sequence labeling tasks: lexical form recovery and part-of-speech tagging. In the lexical form recovery step, morphological changes of an input sentence are restored to the original form. Then in the part-of-speech step, corresponding part-of-speech tags are attached to the recovered form. Experimental results show that our model outperforms previous models which are constructed without prior knowledge.
Jihun Choi 0002, Jonghem Youn, Sang-goo Lee
IEEE BigData1