VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cláudio P. Santiago
dblp:195/1749 · also Claudio Santiago, Cláudio Prata Santiago
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 40% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 20% Trustworthy machine learning · 20% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program synthesis and code generation › inductive program synthesis
symbolic regression |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | A Unified Framework for Deep Symbolic Regression · NeurIPS 2022 Symbolic Regression via Deep Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Genetic Programming Seeding · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Discovering symbolic policies with deep reinforcement learning · ICML 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search
neural-guided search |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Symbolic Regression via Deep Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Genetic Programming Seeding · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradients · ICLR 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
symbolic regression |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradients · ICLR 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Symbolic Regression via Deep Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Genetic Programming Seeding · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
genetic programming · 3.2deep reinforcement learning · 2.0recursive problem simplification · 1.7pre-training · 1.7neural-guided search · 1.7risk-seeking policy gradient · 1.0deep learning · 0.5autoregressive recurrent neural network · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | A Unified Framework for Deep Symbolic RegressionabstractThe last few years have witnessed a surge in methods for symbolic regression, from advances in traditional evolutionary approaches to novel deep learning-based systems. Individual works typically focus on advancing the state-of-the-art for one particular class of solution strategies, and there have been few attempts to investigate the benefits of hybridizing or integrating multiple strategies. In this work, we identify five classes of symbolic regression solution strategies---recursive problem simplification, neural-guided search, large-scale pre-training, genetic programming, and linear models---and propose a strategy to hybridize them into a single modular, unified symbolic regression framework. Based on empirical evaluation using SRBench, a new community tool for benchmarking symbolic regression methods, our unified framework achieves state-of-the-art performance in its ability to (1) symbolically recover analytical expressions, (2) fit datasets with high accuracy, and (3) balance accuracy-complexity trade-offs, across 252 ground-truth and black-box benchmark problems, in both noiseless settings and across various noise levels. Finally, we provide practical use case-based guidance for constructing hybrid symbolic regression algorithms, supported by extensive, combinatorial ablation studies. Mikel Landajuela, Chak Shing Lee, Ruben Glatt, Cláudio P. Santiago, Ignacio Aravena, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Garrett Mulcahy, Brenden K. Petersen |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2021 | Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradients
Brenden K. Petersen, Mikel Landajuela, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Cláudio P. Santiago, Sookyung Kim, Joanne Taery Kim |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2021 | Discovering symbolic policies with deep reinforcement learningabstractDeep reinforcement learning (DRL) has proven successful for many difficult control problems by learning policies represented by neural networks. However, the complexity of neural network-based policies{—}involving thousands of composed non-linear operators{—}can render them problematic to understand, trust, and deploy. In contrast, simple policies comprising short symbolic expressions can facilitate human understanding, while also being transparent and exhibiting predictable behavior. To this end, we propose deep symbolic policy, a novel approach to directly search the space of symbolic policies. We use an autoregressive recurrent neural network to generate control policies represented by tractable mathematical expressions, employing a risk-seeking policy gradient to maximize performance of the generated policies. To scale to environments with multi-dimensional action spaces, we propose an "anchoring" algorithm that distills pre-trained neural network-based policies into fully symbolic policies, one action dimension at a time. We also introduce two novel methods to improve exploration in DRL-based combinatorial optimization, building on ideas of entropy regularization and distribution initialization. Despite their dramatically reduced complexity, we demonstrate that discovered symbolic policies outperform seven state-of-the-art DRL algorithms in terms of average rank and average normalized episodic reward across eight benchmark environments. Mikel Landajuela, Brenden K. Petersen, Sookyung Kim, Cláudio P. Santiago, Ruben Glatt, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Jacob F. Pettit, Daniel M. Faissol |
ICML | 4 |
| 2021 | Symbolic Regression via Deep Reinforcement Learning Enhanced Genetic Programming SeedingabstractSymbolic regression is the process of identifying mathematical expressions that fit observed output from a black-box process. It is a discrete optimization problem generally believed to be NP-hard. Prior approaches to solving the problem include neural-guided search (e.g. using reinforcement learning) and genetic programming. In this work, we introduce a hybrid neural-guided/genetic programming approach to symbolic regression and other combinatorial optimization problems. We propose a neural-guided component used to seed the starting population of a random restart genetic programming component, gradually learning better starting populations. On a number of common benchmark tasks to recover underlying expressions from a dataset, our method recovers 65% more expressions than a recently published top-performing model using the same experimental setup. We demonstrate that running many genetic programming generations without interdependence on the neural-guided component performs better for symbolic regression than alternative formulations where the two are more strongly coupled. Finally, we introduce a new set of 22 symbolic regression benchmark problems with increased difficulty over existing benchmarks. Source code is provided at www.github.com/brendenpetersen/deep-symbolic-optimization. T. Nathan Mundhenk, Mikel Landajuela, Ruben Glatt, Cláudio P. Santiago, Daniel M. Faissol, Brenden K. Petersen |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2018 | A new algorithm for the small-field astrometric point-pattern matching problem
Cláudio P. Santiago, Carlile Lavor, Sérgio Assunção Monteiro, Alberto Krone-Martins |
J. Glob. Optim. | 1 |