Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dinesh Acharya 0001
dblp:195/3691-1
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 67% Optimization for machine learning · 18% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 16% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Sliced Wasserstein Generative Models · CVPR 2019 Wasserstein Divergence for GANs · ECCV (5) 2018 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Sliced Wasserstein Generative Models · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimal transport
wasserstein distance |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Sliced Wasserstein Generative Models · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
divergence measure |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Wasserstein Divergence for GANs · ECCV (5) 2018 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
Wasserstein GAN |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Wasserstein Divergence for GANs · ECCV (5) 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sliced wasserstein distance · 0.4orthogonal projection · 0.4monte carlo · 0.4wasserstein divergence · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Sliced Wasserstein Generative ModelsabstractIn generative modeling, the Wasserstein distance (WD) has emerged as a useful metric to measure the discrepancy between generated and real data distributions. Unfortunately, it is challenging to approximate the WD of high-dimensional distributions. In contrast, the sliced Wasserstein distance (SWD) factorizes high-dimensional distributions into their multiple one-dimensional marginal distributions and is thus easier to approximate. In this paper, we introduce novel approximations of the primal and dual SWD. Instead of using a large number of random projections, as it is done by conventional SWD approximation methods, we propose to approximate SWDs with a small number of parameterized orthogonal projections in an end-to-end deep learning fashion. As concrete applications of our SWD approximations, we design two types of differentiable SWD blocks to equip modern generative frameworks---Auto-Encoders (AE) and Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN). In the experiments, we not only show the superiority of the proposed generative models on standard image synthesis benchmarks, but also demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance on challenging high resolution image and video generation in an unsupervised manner. Jiqing Wu, Zhiwu Huang, Dinesh Acharya 0001, Wen Li 0001, Janine Thoma, Danda Pani Paudel, Luc Van Gool |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2018 | Wasserstein Divergence for GANs
Jiqing Wu, Zhiwu Huang, Janine Thoma, Dinesh Acharya 0001, Luc Van Gool |
ECCV (5) | 4 |