Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yilu Guo
dblp:195/5547
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-5551-7053ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Face, body and person analysis · 28% Deep learning architectures and training · 28% Learning paradigms · 26% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › facial age estimation
age estimation |
0.8 | 2 | 2021 | Deep Differentiable Random Forests for Age Estimation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 Deep Regression Forests for Age Estimation · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
label distribution learning |
0.8 | 2 | 2021 | Deep Differentiable Random Forests for Age Estimation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 Label Distribution Learning Forests · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › decision tree
differentiable decision tree |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Label Distribution Learning Forests · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Deep Differentiable Random Forests for Age Estimation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational bounding · 1.1backpropagation · 0.8deterministic annealing · 0.5distribution-based loss · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Deep Differentiable Random Forests for Age EstimationabstractAge estimation from facial images is typically cast as a label distribution learning or regression problem, since aging is a gradual progress. Its main challenge is the facial feature space w.r.t. ages is inhomogeneous, due to the large variation in facial appearance across different persons of the same age and the non-stationary property of aging. In this paper, we propose two Deep Differentiable Random Forests methods, Deep Label Distribution Learning Forest (DLDLF) and Deep Regression Forest (DRF), for age estimation. Both of them connect split nodes to the top layer of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and deal with inhomogeneous data by jointly learning input-dependent data partitions at the split nodes and age distributions at the leaf nodes. This joint learning follows an alternating strategy: (1) Fixing the leaf nodes and optimizing the split nodes and the CNN parameters by Back-propagation; (2) Fixing the split nodes and optimizing the leaf nodes by Variational Bounding. Two Deterministic Annealing processes are introduced into the learning of the split and leaf nodes, respectively, to avoid poor local optima and obtain better estimates of tree parameters free of initial values. Experimental results show that DLDLF and DRF achieve state-of-the-art performance on three age estimation datasets. Wei Shen 0002, Yilu Guo, Yan Wang 0033, Kai Zhao 0012, Bo Wang 0044, Alan L. Yuille |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2018 | Deep Regression Forests for Age EstimationabstractAge estimation from facial images is typically cast as a nonlinear regression problem. The main challenge of this problem is the facial feature space w.r.t. ages is inhomogeneous, due to the large variation in facial appearance across different persons of the same age and the non-stationary property of aging patterns. In this paper, we propose Deep Regression Forests (DRFs), an end-to-end model, for age estimation. DRFs connect the split nodes to a fully connected layer of a convolutional neural network (CNN) and deal with inhomogeneous data by jointly learning input-dependant data partitions at the split nodes and data abstractions at the leaf nodes. This joint learning follows an alternating strategy: First, by fixing the leaf nodes, the split nodes as well as the CNN parameters are optimized by Back-propagation; Then, by fixing the split nodes, the leaf nodes are optimized by iterating a step-size free update rule derived from Variational Bounding. We verify the proposed DRFs on three standard age estimation benchmarks and achieve state-of-the-art results on all of them. Wei Shen 0002, Yilu Guo, Yan Wang 0033, Kai Zhao 0012, Bo Wang 0044, Alan L. Yuille |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2017 | Label Distribution Learning ForestsabstractLabel distribution learning (LDL) is a general learning framework, which assigns to an instance a distribution over a set of labels rather than a single label or multiple labels. Current LDL methods have either restricted assumptions on the expression form of the label distribution or limitations in representation learning, e.g., to learn deep features in an end-to-end manner. This paper presents label distribution learning forests (LDLFs) - a novel label distribution learning algorithm based on differentiable decision trees, which have several advantages: 1) Decision trees have the potential to model any general form of label distributions by a mixture of leaf node predictions. 2) The learning of differentiable decision trees can be combined with representation learning. We define a distribution-based loss function for a forest, enabling all the trees to be learned jointly, and show that an update function for leaf node predictions, which guarantees a strict decrease of the loss function, can be derived by variational bounding. The effectiveness of the proposed LDLFs is verified on several LDL tasks and a computer vision application, showing significant improvements to the state-of-the-art LDL methods. Wei Shen 0002, Kai Zhao 0012, Yilu Guo, Alan L. Yuille |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2017 | Modeling of a dynamic dual-input dual-output fast steeringmirror systemabstractA modeling method is proposed for a dynamic fast steering mirror (FSM) system with dual inputs and dual outputs. A physical model of the FSM system is derived based on first principles, describing the dynamics and coupling between the inputs and outputs of the FSM system. The physical model is then represented in a state-space form. Unknown parameters in the state-space model are identified by the subspace identification algorithm, based on the measured input-output data of the FSM system. The accuracy of the state-space model is evaluated by comparing the model estimates with measurements. The variance-accounted-for value of the state-space model is better than 97%, not only for the modeling data but also for the validation data set, indicating high accuracy of the model. Comparison is also made between the proposed dynamic model and the conventional static model, where improvement in model accuracy is clearly observed. The model identified by the proposed method can be used for optimal controller design for closed-loop FSM systems. The modeling method is also applicable to FSM systems with similar structures. Hong Song 0002, Jiaheng Zhang, Haocai Huang, Shu-yue Zhan, Tengjun Liu, Yilu Guo, Hangzhou Wang, Quanquan Mu, Mei-fen Fang, Mingyuan Yang |
Frontiers Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng. | 7 |
| 2017 | Parameter estimation in exponential models by linear and nonlinear fitting methodsabstractEstimation of unknown parameters in exponential models by linear and nonlinear fitting methods is discussed. Based on the extreme value theorem and Taylor series expansion, it is proved theoretically that the parameters estimated by the linear fitting method alone cannot minimize the sum of the squared residual errors in the measurement data when measurement noise is involved in the data. Numerical simulation is performed to compare the performance of the linear and nonlinear fitting methods. Simulation results show that the linear method can obtain only a suboptimal estimate of the unknown parameters and that the nonlinear method gives more accurate results. Application of the fitting methods is demonstrated where the water spectral attenuation coefficient is estimated from underwater images and imaging distances, which supports the improvement in the accuracy of parameter estimation by the nonlinear fitting method. Chao-peng Wu, Yilu Guo, Hongbo Liu 0003, Hangzhou Wang, Shu-yue Zhan, Bang-yi Tao, Quanquan Mu, Hong Song 0002 |
Frontiers Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng. | 3 |