Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Kevin Schawinski

dblp:195/6243 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-5464-0888ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning and data management
machine learning lifecycle management
0.412019
Ease.ml/ci and Ease.ml/meter in Action: Towards Data Management for Statistical Generalization · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019
Machine learning and data management
overfitting control
0.412019
Ease.ml/ci and Ease.ml/meter in Action: Towards Data Management for Statistical Generalization · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

continuous integration · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Ease.ML: A Lifecycle Management System for Machine Learning
Leonel Aguilar Melgar, David Dao, Shaoduo Gan, Nezihe Merve Gürel, Nora Hollenstein, Jiawei Jiang 0001, Bojan Karlas, Thomas Lemmin, Tian Li 0005, Yang Li 0106, Susie Xi Rao, Johannes Rausch, Cédric Renggli, Luka Rimanic, Maurice Weber, Shuai Zhang 0007, Zhikuan Zhao, Kevin Schawinski, Wentao Wu 0001, Ce Zhang 0001
CIDR18
2019 Ease.ml/ci and Ease.ml/meter in Action: Towards Data Management for Statistical Generalization
abstract
Developing machine learning (ML) applications is similar to developing traditional software --- it is often an iterative process in which developers navigate within a rich space of requirements, design decisions, implementations, empirical quality , and performance . In traditional software development, software engineering is the field of study which provides principled guidelines for this iterative process. However, as of today, the counterpart of "software engineering for ML" is largely missing --- developers of ML applications are left with powerful tools (e.g., TensorFlow and PyTorch) but little guidance regarding the development lifecycle itself. In this paper, we view the management of ML development life-cycles from a data management perspective. We demonstrate two closely related systems, ease.ml/ci and ease.ml/meter, that provide some "principled guidelines" for ML application development: ci is a continuous integration engine for ML models and meter is a "profiler" for controlling overfitting of ML models. Both systems focus on managing the "statistical generalization power" of datasets used for assessing the quality of ML applications, namely, the validation set and the test set . By demonstrating these two systems we hope to spawn further discussions within our community on building this new type of data management systems for statistical generalization.
Cédric Renggli, Frances Ann Hubis, Bojan Karlas, Kevin Schawinski, Wentao Wu 0001, Ce Zhang 0001
Proc. VLDB Endow.4