Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Morgane Austern

dblp:195/6288 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1497-065XORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Learning theory · 75% Graph learning · 12% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 7%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 67% Computational complexity · 33%

Topics — the 19 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory
1.422025
Universality of High-Dimensional Logistic Regression and a Novel CGMT under Dependence with Applications to Data Augmentation · COLT 2025
Asymptotics of the Bootstrap via Stability with Applications to Inference with Model Selection · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics › high-dimensional asymptotics
gaussian universality
0.912025
Universality of High-Dimensional Logistic Regression and a Novel CGMT under Dependence with Applications to Data Augmentation · COLT 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
high-dimensional asymptotics
0.912025
Universality of High-Dimensional Logistic Regression and a Novel CGMT under Dependence with Applications to Data Augmentation · COLT 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
asymptotic analysis
0.712023
Asymptotics of Network Embeddings Learned via Subsampling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning
network embedding
0.712023
Asymptotics of Network Embeddings Learned via Subsampling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.612022
Debiased Machine Learning without Sample-Splitting for Stable Estimators · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › causal machine learning
debiased machine learning
0.612022
Debiased Machine Learning without Sample-Splitting for Stable Estimators · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
semiparametric estimation
0.612022
Debiased Machine Learning without Sample-Splitting for Stable Estimators · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › confidence set construction
confidence intervals
0.512021
Asymptotics of the Bootstrap via Stability with Applications to Inference with Model Selection · NeurIPS 2021
Information theory › information measures › entropy
conditional entropy
0.412020
On the Gaussianity of Kolmogorov Complexity of Mixing Sequences · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020
Computational complexity
kolmogorov complexity
0.412020
On the Gaussianity of Kolmogorov Complexity of Mixing Sequences · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020
Information theory › information measures › entropy
shannon entropy
0.412020
On the Gaussianity of Kolmogorov Complexity of Mixing Sequences · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
compression bounds
0.412019
Non-vacuous Generalization Bounds at the ImageNet Scale: a PAC-Bayesian Compression Approach · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.412019
Non-vacuous Generalization Bounds at the ImageNet Scale: a PAC-Bayesian Compression Approach · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
non-vacuous generalization bounds
0.412019
Non-vacuous Generalization Bounds at the ImageNet Scale: a PAC-Bayesian Compression Approach · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
PAC-Bayes bounds
0.412019
Non-vacuous Generalization Bounds at the ImageNet Scale: a PAC-Bayesian Compression Approach · ICLR (Poster) 2019
Machine learning › Graph learning
link prediction
0.212023
Asymptotics of Network Embeddings Learned via Subsampling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
node classification
0.212023
Asymptotics of Network Embeddings Learned via Subsampling · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection
0.112021
Asymptotics of the Bootstrap via Stability with Applications to Inference with Model Selection · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

data augmentation · 0.9convex gaussian min-max theorem · 0.9subsampling · 0.7stochastic gradient descent · 0.7exchangeability · 0.7generalized method of moments · 0.6ensemble bagging · 0.6cross-fitting · 0.6kernel selection · 0.5empirical bootstrap · 0.5mixing conditions · 0.4concentration bounds · 0.4central limit theorem · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Perfect Recovery for Random Geometric Graph Matching with Shallow Graph Neural Networks
abstract
We study the graph matching problem in the presence of vertex feature information using shallow graph neural networks. Specifically, given two graphs that are independent perturbations of a single random geometric graph with sparse binary features, the task is to recover an unknown one-to-one mapping between the vertices of the two graphs. We show under certain conditions on the sparsity and noise level of the feature vectors, a carefully designed two-layer graph neural network can, with high probability, recover the correct mapping between the vertices with the help of the graph structure. Additionally, we prove that our condition on the noise parameter is tight up to logarithmic factors. Finally, we compare the performance of the graph neural network to directly solving an assignment problem using the noisy vertex features and demonstrate that when the noise level is at least constant, this direct matching fails to achieve perfect recovery, whereas the graph neural network can tolerate noise levels growing as fast as a power of the size of the graph. Our theoretical findings are further supported by numerical studies as well as real-world data experiments.
Suqi Liu, Morgane Austern
AISTATS2
2025 Universality of High-Dimensional Logistic Regression and a Novel CGMT under Dependence with Applications to Data Augmentation
abstract
Over the last decade, a wave of research has characterized the exact asymptotic risk of many high-dimensional models in the proportional regime. Two foundational results have driven this progress: Gaussian universality, which shows that the asymptotic risk of estimators trained on non-Gaussian and Gaussian data is equivalent, and the convex Gaussian min-max theorem (CGMT), which characterizes the risk under Gaussian settings. However, these results rely on the assumption that the data consists of independent random vectors-an assumption that significantly limit its applicability to many practical setups. In this paper, we address this limitation by generalizing both results to the dependent setting. More precisely, we prove that Gaussian universality still holds for high-dimensional logistic regression under block dependence, $m$-dependence and special cases of $\beta$-mixing, and establish a novel CGMT framework that accommodates for correlation across both the covariates and observations. Using these results, we establish the impact of data augmentation, a widespread practice in deep learning, on the asymptotic risk.
Matthew Esmaili Mallory, Kevin Han Huang, Morgane Austern
COLT3
2023 Asymptotics of Network Embeddings Learned via Subsampling
abstract
Network data are ubiquitous in modern machine learning, with tasks of interest including node classification, node clustering and link prediction. A frequent approach begins by learning an Euclidean embedding of the network, to which algorithms developed for vector-valued data are applied. For large networks, embeddings are learned using stochastic gradient methods where the sub-sampling scheme can be freely chosen. Despite the strong empirical performance of such methods, they are not well understood theoretically. Our work encapsulates representation methods using a subsampling approach, such as node2vec, into a single unifying framework. We prove, under the assumption that the graph is exchangeable, that the distribution of the learned embedding vectors asymptotically decouples. Moreover, we characterize the asymptotic distribution and provided rates of convergence, in terms of the latent parameters, which includes the choice of loss function and the embedding dimension. This provides a theoretical foundation to understand what the embedding vectors represent and how well these methods perform on downstream tasks. Notably, we observe that typically used loss functions may lead to shortcomings, such as a lack of Fisher consistency.
Morgane Austern
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2022 Debiased Machine Learning without Sample-Splitting for Stable Estimators
abstract
Estimation and inference on causal parameters is typically reduced to a generalized method of moments problem, which involves auxiliary functions that correspond to solutions to a regression or classification problem. Recent line of work on debiased machine learning shows how one can use generic machine learning estimators for these auxiliary problems, while maintaining asymptotic normality and root-$n$ consistency of the target parameter of interest, while only requiring mean-squared-error guarantees from the auxiliary estimation algorithms. The literature typically requires that these auxiliary problems are fitted on a separate sample or in a cross-fitting manner. We show that when these auxiliary estimation algorithms satisfy natural leave-one-out stability properties, then sample splitting is not required. This allows for sample re-use, which can be beneficial in moderately sized sample regimes. For instance, we show that the stability properties that we propose are satisfied for ensemble bagged estimators, built via sub-sampling without replacement, a popular technique in machine learning practice.
Qizhao Chen, Vasilis Syrgkanis, Morgane Austern
NeurIPS3
2021 Asymptotics of the Bootstrap via Stability with Applications to Inference with Model Selection
abstract
One of the most commonly used methods for forming confidence intervals is the empirical bootstrap, which is especially expedient when the limiting distribution of the estimator is unknown. However, despite its ubiquitous role in machine learning, its theoretical properties are still not well understood. Recent developments in probability have provided new tools to study the bootstrap method. However, they have been applied only to specific applications and contexts, and it is unclear whether these techniques are applicable to the understanding of the consistency of the bootstrap in machine learning pipelines. In this paper, we derive general stability conditions under which the empirical bootstrap estimator is consistent and quantify the speed of convergence. Moreover, we propose alternative ways to use the bootstrap method to build confidence intervals with coverage guarantees. Finally, we illustrate the generality and tightness of our results by examples of interest for machine learning including for two-sample kernel tests after kernel selection and the empirical risk of stacked estimators.
Morgane Austern, Vasilis Syrgkanis
NeurIPS1
2020 On the Gaussianity of Kolmogorov Complexity of Mixing Sequences
abstract
It has been proved that for all stationary and ergodic processes the average Kolmogorov complexity of the first n observations converges almost surely to its Shannon's conditional entropy. This paper studies the convergence rate of this asymptotic result. In particular, we show that if the process satisfies certain mixing conditions, then a central limit theorem will be respected. Furthermore, we show that under slightly stronger mixing conditions one may obtain non-asymptotic concentration bounds for the Kolmogorov complexity.
Morgane Austern, Arian Maleki
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2019 Empirical Risk Minimization and Stochastic Gradient Descent for Relational Data
abstract
Empirical risk minimization is the main tool for prediction problems, but its extension to relational data remains unsolved. We solve this problem using recent ideas from graph sampling theory to (i) define an empirical risk for relational data and (ii) obtain stochastic gradients for this empirical risk that are automatically unbiased. This is achieved by considering the method by which data is sampled from a graph as an explicit component of model design. By integrating fast implementations of graph sampling schemes with standard automatic differentiation tools, we provide an efficient turnkey solver for the risk minimization problem. We establish basic theoretical properties of the procedure. Finally, we demonstrate relational ERM with application to two non-standard problems: one-stage training for semi-supervised node classification, and learning embedding vectors for vertex attributes. Experiments confirm that the turnkey inference procedure is effective in practice, and that the sampling scheme used for model specification has a strong effect on model performance.
Victor Veitch, Morgane Austern, Wenda Zhou, David M. Blei, Peter Orbanz
AISTATS2
2019 Non-vacuous Generalization Bounds at the ImageNet Scale: a PAC-Bayesian Compression Approach
Wenda Zhou, Victor Veitch, Morgane Austern, Ryan P. Adams, Peter Orbanz
ICLR (Poster)3