Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ted Zhang

dblp:195/8274 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 57% Representation and self-supervised learning · 43%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
attribute value extraction
0.412019
Accurate Product Attribute Extraction on the Field · ICDE 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › bootstrapping
bootstrapping for information extraction
0.412019
Accurate Product Attribute Extraction on the Field · ICDE 2019
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › multimodal representation learning
multimodal embedding
0.312017
Imagined Visual Representations as Multimodal Embeddings · AAAI 2017
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
multimodal representation learning
0.312017
Imagined Visual Representations as Multimodal Embeddings · AAAI 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ensemble learning · 0.4bootstrapping · 0.4word embeddings · 0.3language-to-vision mapping · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Accurate Product Attribute Extraction on the Field
abstract
In this paper we present a bootstrapping approach for attribute value extraction that minimizes the need for human intervention. Our approach automatically extracts attribute names and values from semi-structured text, generates a small labelled dataset, and bootstraps it by extracting new values from unstructured text. It is domain/language-independent, relying only on existing semi-structured text to create the initial labeled dataset. We assess the impact of different machine learning approaches to increase precision of the core approach without compromising coverage. We perform an extensive evaluation using e-commerce product data across different categories in two languages and hundreds of thousands of product pages. We show that our approach provides high precision and good coverage. In addition, we study the impact of different methods that address specific sources of error. With error analysis we highlight how these methods complement each other, obtaining insights about the individual methods and the ensamble as a whole.
Martín Rezk, Laura Alonso Alemany, Lasguido Nio, Ted Zhang
ICDE4
2017 Imagined Visual Representations as Multimodal Embeddings
abstract
Language and vision provide complementary information. Integrating both modalities in a single multimodal representation is an unsolved problem with wide-reaching applications to both natural language processing and computer vision. In this paper, we present a simple and effective method that learns a language-to-vision mapping and uses its output visual predictions to build multimodal representations. In this sense, our method provides a cognitively plausible way of building representations, consistent with the inherently re-constructive and associative nature of human memory. Using seven benchmark concept similarity tests we show that the mapped (or imagined) vectors not only help to fuse multimodal information, but also outperform strong unimodal baselines and state-of-the-art multimodal methods, thus exhibiting more human-like judgments. Ultimately, the present work sheds light on fundamental questions of natural language understanding concerning the fusion of vision and language such as the plausibility of more associative and re-constructive approaches.
Guillem Collell, Ted Zhang, Marie-Francine Moens
AAAI2