Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yixin Ye

dblp:196/0306 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 32% Vision and language · 27% Generative modeling · 27%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 77% Computational science and engineering · 23%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.812024
OlympicArena: Benchmarking Multi-discipline Cognitive Reasoning for Superintelligent AI · NeurIPS 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.812024
Dissecting Dissonance: Benchmarking Large Multimodal Models Against Self-Contradictory Instructions · ECCV (57) 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal evaluation
multimodal reasoning evaluation
0.812024
OlympicArena: Benchmarking Multi-discipline Cognitive Reasoning for Superintelligent AI · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
multimodal robustness
0.812024
Dissecting Dissonance: Benchmarking Large Multimodal Models Against Self-Contradictory Instructions · ECCV (57) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.812024
Dissecting Dissonance: Benchmarking Large Multimodal Models Against Self-Contradictory Instructions · ECCV (57) 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
text-to-image diffusion model
0.812024
Lost in Translation: Latent Concept Misalignment in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models · ECCV (69) 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation
0.812024
Lost in Translation: Latent Concept Misalignment in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models · ECCV (69) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.212024
Lost in Translation: Latent Concept Misalignment in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models · ECCV (69) 2024
Computational science and engineering
AI for science
0.212024
OlympicArena: Benchmarking Multi-discipline Cognitive Reasoning for Superintelligent AI · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

process-level evaluation · 1.5benchmark evaluation · 1.5benchmarking · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Dissecting Dissonance: Benchmarking Large Multimodal Models Against Self-Contradictory Instructions
Yuankai Li, Yixin Ye, Dequan Wang
ECCV (57)4
2024 Lost in Translation: Latent Concept Misalignment in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
Juntu Zhao, Junyu Deng, Yixin Ye, Chongxuan Li, Zhijie Deng, Dequan Wang
ECCV (69)3
2024 OlympicArena: Benchmarking Multi-discipline Cognitive Reasoning for Superintelligent AI
abstract
The evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been significantly accelerated by advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Multimodal Models (LMMs), gradually showcasing potential cognitive reasoning abilities in problem-solving and scientific discovery (i.e., AI4Science) once exclusive to human intellect. To comprehensively evaluate current models' performance in cognitive reasoning abilities, we introduce OlympicArena, which includes 11,163 bilingual problems across both text-only and interleaved text-image modalities. These challenges encompass a wide range of disciplines spanning seven fields and 62 international Olympic competitions, rigorously examined for data leakage. We argue that the challenges in Olympic competition problems are ideal for evaluating AI's cognitive reasoning due to their complexity and interdisciplinary nature, which are essential for tackling complex scientific challenges and facilitating discoveries. Beyond evaluating performance across various disciplines using answer-only criteria, we conduct detailed experiments and analyses from multiple perspectives. We delve into the models' cognitive reasoning abilities, their performance across different modalities, and their outcomes in process-level evaluations, which are vital for tasks requiring complex reasoning with lengthy solutions. Our extensive evaluations reveal that even advanced models like GPT-4o only achieve a 39.97\% overall accuracy (28.67\% for mathematics and 29.71\% for physics), illustrating current AI limitations in complex reasoning and multimodal integration. Through the OlympicArena, we aim to advance AI towards superintelligence, equipping it to address more complex challenges in science and beyond. We also provide a comprehensive set of resources to support AI research, including a benchmark dataset, an open-source annotation platform, a detailed evaluation tool, and a leaderboard with automatic submission features.
Zengzhi Wang, Shijie Xia, Xuefeng Li 0003, Haoyang Zou, Ruijie Xu 0005, Run-Ze Fan, Lyumanshan Ye, Ethan Chern, Yixin Ye, Yikai Zhang 0003, Yuqing Yang 0004, Binjie Wang, Shichao Sun, Yiyuan Li, Steffi Chern, Yiwei Qin, Jiadi Su, Yixiu Liu, Shaoting Zhang 0001, Dahua Lin, Yu Qiao 0001, Pengfei Liu 0003
NeurIPS10
2024 Finite-Element Scheme With Total-Field for 3-D Marine Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Modeling With Bathymetry and Multisources
abstract
Herein, a finite element scheme with total-field formulation for 3-D frequency-domain marine controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) modeling with bathymetry is presented. We employ a finite-element method based on an unstructured tetrahedral mesh to directly solve the total electromagnetic field equation in terms of vector-scalar potentials. In addition, an mesh refinement approach is proposed to accurately simulate marine CSEM responses in cases involving different frequencies, transmitters, and receivers. First, the mesh is locally refined according to the volume constraints as well as the transmitter and receiver positions. Next, the mesh is adaptively refined according to a posteriori error estimation of the finite-element solution. The a posteriori error is calculated based on the gradient recovery technology and weighted using the dual-error weighting (DEW) approach. The scheme is parallelized to improve its computational efficiency for accommodating multiple field sources, receivers, and frequencies. Various numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed scheme can effectively provide highly accurate solutions for marine CSEM responses, and the scheme is applied to the modeling of hydrocarbon reservoirs with bathymetry and multisources. The effects of bathymetry on marine CSEM responses for both inline and broadside geometries are discussed lastly.
Yixin Ye, Fenyong Jiang
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens.1