Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Caroline M. Wilkinson

dblp:196/0595 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0002-4603-5554ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Digital forensics and information hiding › digital forensics
forensic identification
0.312018
Modeling Skull-Face Anatomical/Morphological Correspondence for Craniofacial Superimposition-Based Identification · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hierarchical decision support system · 0.3anatomical modeling · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Modeling Skull-Face Anatomical/Morphological Correspondence for Craniofacial Superimposition-Based Identification
abstract
Craniofacial superimposition (CFS) is a forensic identification technique, which studies the anatomical and morphological correspondence between a skull and a face. It involves the process of overlaying a variable number of facial images with the skull. This technique has great potential, since nowadays a wide majority of people have photographs, where their faces are clearly visible. In addition, the skull is a bone that hardly degrades under the effect of fire, humidity, temperature changes, and so on. Three consecutive stages for the CFS process have been distinguished: the acquisition and processing of the materials, the skull-face overlay, and the decision making. This final stage consists of determining the degree of support for a match based on the previous overlays. The final decision is guided by different criteria depending on the anatomical relations between the skull and the face. In previous approaches, we proposed a framework for automating this stage at different levels, taking into consideration all the information and uncertainty sources involved. In this paper, we model new anatomical skull-face regions and tackle the last level of the hierarchical decision support system. For the first time, we present a complete system, which provides a final degree of craniofacial correspondence. Furthermore, we validate our system as an automatic identification tool analyzing its capabilities in closed (known information or a potential list of those involved) and open lists (little or no idea at first who may be involved) and comparing its performance with the manual results achieved by experts, obtaining a remarkable performance. The proposed system has been demonstrated to be valid for sort-listing a given data set of initial candidates (in 62.5% of the cases, the positive one is ranked in the first position) and to serve as an exclusion method (97.4% and 96% of true negatives in training and test, respectively).
Carmen Campomanes-Álvarez, Rubén Martos, Caroline M. Wilkinson, Óscar Ibáñez, Oscar Cordón
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.3