Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Caroline M. Wilkinson
dblp:196/0595
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0002-4603-5554ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Digital forensics and information hiding › digital forensics
forensic identification |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Modeling Skull-Face Anatomical/Morphological Correspondence for Craniofacial Superimposition-Based Identification · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hierarchical decision support system · 0.3anatomical modeling · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Modeling Skull-Face Anatomical/Morphological Correspondence for Craniofacial Superimposition-Based IdentificationabstractCraniofacial superimposition (CFS) is a forensic identification technique, which studies the anatomical and morphological correspondence between a skull and a face. It involves the process of overlaying a variable number of facial images with the skull. This technique has great potential, since nowadays a wide majority of people have photographs, where their faces are clearly visible. In addition, the skull is a bone that hardly degrades under the effect of fire, humidity, temperature changes, and so on. Three consecutive stages for the CFS process have been distinguished: the acquisition and processing of the materials, the skull-face overlay, and the decision making. This final stage consists of determining the degree of support for a match based on the previous overlays. The final decision is guided by different criteria depending on the anatomical relations between the skull and the face. In previous approaches, we proposed a framework for automating this stage at different levels, taking into consideration all the information and uncertainty sources involved. In this paper, we model new anatomical skull-face regions and tackle the last level of the hierarchical decision support system. For the first time, we present a complete system, which provides a final degree of craniofacial correspondence. Furthermore, we validate our system as an automatic identification tool analyzing its capabilities in closed (known information or a potential list of those involved) and open lists (little or no idea at first who may be involved) and comparing its performance with the manual results achieved by experts, obtaining a remarkable performance. The proposed system has been demonstrated to be valid for sort-listing a given data set of initial candidates (in 62.5% of the cases, the positive one is ranked in the first position) and to serve as an exclusion method (97.4% and 96% of true negatives in training and test, respectively). Carmen Campomanes-Álvarez, Rubén Martos, Caroline M. Wilkinson, Óscar Ibáñez, Oscar Cordón |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 3 |