Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander J. Mentzer

dblp:196/3215 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-4502-2209ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.412019
HLA*LA - HLA typing from linearly projected graph alignments · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence alignment
graph-based alignment
0.412019
HLA*LA - HLA typing from linearly projected graph alignments · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › immunoinformatics
HLA typing
0.412019
HLA*LA - HLA typing from linearly projected graph alignments · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.112019
HLA*LA - HLA typing from linearly projected graph alignments · Bioinform. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear alignment projection · 0.4graph alignment · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 HLA*LA - HLA typing from linearly projected graph alignments
abstract
SUMMARY: HLA*LA implements a new graph alignment model for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) type inference, based on the projection of linear alignments onto a variation graph. It enables accurate HLA type inference from whole-genome (99% accuracy) and whole-exome (93% accuracy) Illumina data; from long-read Oxford Nanopore and Pacific Biosciences data (98% accuracy for whole-genome and targeted data) and from genome assemblies. Computational requirements for a typical sample vary between 0.7 and 14 CPU hours per sample. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: HLA*LA is implemented in C++ and Perl and freely available as a bioconda package or from https://github.com/DiltheyLab/HLA-LA (GPL v3). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Alexander T. Dilthey, Alexander J. Mentzer, Raphael Carapito, Clare Cutland, Nezih Cereb, Shabir A Madhi, Arang Rhie, Sergey Koren, Seiamak Bahram, Gil McVean, Adam M. Phillippy
Bioinform.2
2016 High-Accuracy HLA Type Inference from Whole-Genome Sequencing Data Using Population Reference Graphs
abstract
Genetic variation at the Human Leucocyte Antigen (HLA) genes is associated with many autoimmune and infectious disease phenotypes, is an important element of the immunological distinction between self and non-self, and shapes immune epitope repertoires. Determining the allelic state of the HLA genes (HLA typing) as a by-product of standard whole-genome sequencing data would therefore be highly desirable and enable the immunogenetic characterization of samples in currently ongoing population sequencing projects. Extensive hyperpolymorphism and sequence similarity between the HLA genes, however, pose problems for accurate read mapping and make HLA type inference from whole-genome sequencing data a challenging problem. We describe how to address these challenges in a Population Reference Graph (PRG) framework. First, we construct a PRG for 46 (mostly HLA) genes and pseudogenes, their genomic context and their characterized sequence variants, integrating a database of over 10,000 known allele sequences. Second, we present a sequence-to-PRG paired-end read mapping algorithm that enables accurate read mapping for the HLA genes. Third, we infer the most likely pair of underlying alleles at G group resolution from the IMGT/HLA database at each locus, employing a simple likelihood framework. We show that HLA*PRG, our algorithm, outperforms existing methods by a wide margin. We evaluate HLA*PRG on six classical class I and class II HLA genes (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DQA1, -DQB1, -DRB1) and on a set of 14 samples (3 samples with 2 x 100bp, 11 samples with 2 x 250bp Illumina HiSeq data). Of 158 alleles tested, we correctly infer 157 alleles (99.4%). We also identify and re-type two erroneous alleles in the original validation data. We conclude that HLA*PRG for the first time achieves accuracies comparable to gold-standard reference methods from standard whole-genome sequencing data, though high computational demands (currently ~30-250 CPU hours per sample) remain a significant challenge to practical application.
Alexander T. Dilthey, Pierre-Antoine Gourraud, Alexander J. Mentzer, Nezih Cereb, Zamin Iqbal, Gil McVean
PLoS Comput. Biol.3