Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wijnand Suijlen
dblp:196/8048
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-6450-5620ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 1 first-author · 6 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 50% Optimization for machine learning · 50% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
constraint programming |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Generalized Confidence Constraints · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
robust optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Generalized Confidence Constraints · AAAI 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
decision diagram optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Generalized Confidence Constraints · AAAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-valued decision diagrams · 1.3constraint propagation · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Lazy ad hoc Explanations for the Sum ConstraintabstractHybridization of CP and SAT combines the strengths of both paradigms, Constraint Programming (CP) and the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT). This hybridization allows for the use of dedicated CP propagators paired with the powerful clause learning mechanism of SAT. In contrast to lazy clause generation, solvers based on lazy explanations extract a SAT explanation after each conflict and in particular after those detected by a CP propagator. In this article, we rely on a constraint-wise generic explanation algorithm to build new ad hoc explanation and reason extracting algorithms for the Sum constraint and some of its variants. Time complexity concerns fueled the elaboration of a relaxed version of our ad hoc algorithms, where the loss of a reasonable amount of clause accuracy yields better results. Finally, we conduct an empirical study on XCSP3 instances, where the efficiency of our ad hoc algorithms in reducing the size of generated clauses is clearly visible. Suruthy Sekar, Gaël Glorian, Wijnand Suijlen, Éric Monfroy, Arnaud Lallouet |
ICTAI | 3 |
| 2023 | Generalized Confidence ConstraintsabstractIn robust optimization, finding a solution that solely respects the constraints is not enough. Usually, the uncertainty and unknown parameters of the model are represented by random variables. In such conditions, a good solution is a solution robust to most-likely assignments of these random variables. Recently, the Confidence constraint has been introduced by Mercier-Aubin et al. in order to enforce this type of robustness in constraint programming. Unfortunately, it is restricted to a conjunction of binary inequalities In this paper, we generalize the Confidence constraint to any constraint and propose an implementation based on Multi-valued Decision Diagrams (MDDs). The Confidence constraint is defined over a vector of random variables. For a given constraint C, and given a threshold, the Confidence constraint ensures that the probability for C to be satisfied by a sample of the random variables is greater than the threshold. We propose to use MDDs to represent the constraints on the random variables. MDDs are an efficient tool for representing combinatorial constraints, thanks to their exponential compression power. Here, both random and decision variables are stored in the MDD, and propagation rules are proposed for removing values of decision variables that cannot lead to robust solutions. Furthermore, for several constraints, we show that decision variables can be omitted from the MDD because lighter filtering algorithms are sufficient. This leads to gain an exponential factor in the MDD size. The experimental results obtained on a chemical deliveries problem in factories – where the chemicals consumption are uncertain – shows the efficiency of the proposed approach. Guillaume Perez, Steve Malalel, Gaël Glorian, Victor Jung, Alexandre Papadopoulos, Marie Pelleau, Wijnand Suijlen, Jean-Charles Régin, Arnaud Lallouet |
AAAI | 7 |
| 2023 | Distribution Optimization in Constraint Programming
Guillaume Perez, Gaël Glorian, Wijnand Suijlen, Arnaud Lallouet |
CP | 3 |
| 2023 | A Constraint Programming Model for Scheduling the Unloading of Trains in PortsabstractIn this paper, we propose a model to schedule the next 24 hours of operations in a bulk cargo port to unload bulk cargo trains onto stockpiles. It is a problem that includes multiple parts such as splitting long trains into shorter ones and the routing of bulk material through a configurable network of conveyors to the stockpiles. Managing such trains (up to three kilometers long) also requires specialized equipment. The real world nature of the problem specification implies the necessity to manage heterogeneous data. Indeed, when new equipment is added (e.g. dumpers) or a new type of wagon comes in use, older or different equipment will still be in use as well. In this paper, we provide a detailed presentation of this real world problem and its associated data. This allows us to propose an effective constraint programming model to solve this problem. We also discuss the model design and the different implementations of the propagators that we used in practice. Finally, we show how this model, coupled with a large neighborhood search, was able to find 24 hour schedules efficiently Guillaume Perez, Gaël Glorian, Wijnand Suijlen, Arnaud Lallouet |
ICTAI | 3 |
| 2022 | A Parallel Algorithm for GAC Filtering of the Alldifferent Constraint
Wijnand Suijlen, Félix de Framond, Arnaud Lallouet, Antoine Petitet |
CPAIOR | 1 |
| 2022 | A Deep Reinforcement Learning Heuristic for SAT based on Antagonist Graph Neural NetworksabstractHeuristics are one of the most important tools to guide search to solve combinatorial problems. They are often specifically designed for one single problem and require both expertise and implementation work. Generic frameworks like SAT or CSP have developed heuristics that obey general principles like first fail or are able to learn and adapt from the exploration of the search tree like Dom/wDeg. In SAT, the classic VSIDS heuristic falls into both categories. The question of whether it is possible to learn from solving existing problems has been addressed for a long time by portfolio solvers where the best heuristic is chosen by Machine Learning from hand-crafted features, and more recently with Deep Learning by embedding this knowledge into a Graph Neural Network (GNN). In this paper, we build upon the latter category by proposing a new heuristic based on Deep Reinforcement Learning using two GNNs with adversarial rewards. We show that our method reduces the number of fails to get the first solution by more than 50% compared to MiniSat. This work shows the advantages of this type of techniques to extract structural and contextual knowledge from past solving experience. Thomas Fournier, Arnaud Lallouet, Télio Cropsal, Gaël Glorian, Alexandre Papadopoulos, Antoine Petitet, Guillaume Perez, Suruthy Sekar, Wijnand Suijlen |
ICTAI | 9 |
| 2018 | Active Objects for Coordinating BSP Computations (Short Paper)
Gaétan Hains, Ludovic Henrio, Pierre Leca, Wijnand Suijlen |
COORDINATION | 4 |