Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pei Yuan

dblp:198/0000 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Emerging computing paradigms · 100%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Computational complexity · 57% Algorithms and data structures · 29% Quantum computing and quantum information · 14%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computer architecture
1.422024
Does Qubit Connectivity Impact Quantum Circuit Complexity? · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2024
Asymptotically Optimal Circuit Depth for Quantum State Preparation and General Unitary Synthesis · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2023
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture › quantum circuit synthesis
quantum state preparation
0.922024
Asymptotically Optimal Circuit Depth for Quantum State Preparation and General Unitary Synthesis · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2023
Does Qubit Connectivity Impact Quantum Circuit Complexity? · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2024
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture
qubit connectivity
0.812024
Does Qubit Connectivity Impact Quantum Circuit Complexity? · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2024
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture
quantum circuit synthesis
0.712023
Asymptotically Optimal Circuit Depth for Quantum State Preparation and General Unitary Synthesis · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2023
Computational complexity › circuit complexity
circuit depth
0.712023
Asymptotically Optimal Circuit Depth for Quantum State Preparation and General Unitary Synthesis · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2023
Computational complexity › query complexity
quantum query complexity
0.712023
Exact quantum query complexity of weight decision problems via Chebyshev polynomials · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2023
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum machine learning
dequantization
0.412019
A Quantum-inspired Classical Algorithm for Separable Non-negative Matrix Factorization · IJCAI 2019
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
matrix factorization
0.412019
A Quantum-inspired Classical Algorithm for Separable Non-negative Matrix Factorization · IJCAI 2019
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › matrix factorization › low-rank matrix factorization
nonnegative matrix factorization
0.412019
A Quantum-inspired Classical Algorithm for Separable Non-negative Matrix Factorization · IJCAI 2019
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computing
0.212024
Does Qubit Connectivity Impact Quantum Circuit Complexity? · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2024
Computational complexity
query complexity
0.212023
Exact quantum query complexity of weight decision problems via Chebyshev polynomials · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ancillary qubits · 1.3circuit depth analysis · 0.8ancilla qubit trade-off · 0.8time-space tradeoffs · 0.7time-space trade-off · 0.7chebyshev polynomials · 0.7separability assumption · 0.4sampling · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Does Qubit Connectivity Impact Quantum Circuit Complexity?
abstract
Some physical implementation schemes of quantum computing can apply two-qubit gates only on certain pairs of qubits. These connectivity constraints are commonly viewed as a significant disadvantage. For example, compiling an unrestricted$n$-qubit quantum circuit to one with poor qubit connectivity, such as a 1-D chain, usually results in a blowup of depth by$O(n^{2})$and size by$O(n)$. It is appealing to conjecture that this overhead is unavoidable—a random circuit on$n$qubits has$\Theta (n)$two-qubit gates in each layer and a constant fraction of them act on qubits separated by distance$\Theta (n)$. While it is known that almost all$n$-qubit unitary operations need quantum circuits of$\Omega (4^{n}/n)$depth and$\Omega (4^{n})$size to realize with all-to-all qubit connectivity, in this article, we show that all$n$-qubit unitary operations can be implemented by quantum circuits of$O(4^{n}/n)$depth and$O(4^{n})$size even under 1-D chain qubit connectivity constraint. We extend this result and investigate qubit connectivity in three directions. First, we consider more general connectivity graphs and show that the circuit size can always be made$O(4^{n})$as long as the graph is connected. For circuit depth, we study$d$-dimensional grids, complete$d$-ary trees and expander graphs, and show results similar to the 1-D chain. Second, we consider the case when ancillary qubits are available. We show that, with ancilla, the circuit depth can be made polynomial, and the space-depth trade-off is not impaired by connectivity constraints unless we have exponentially many ancillary qubits. Third, we obtain nearly optimal results on special families of unitaries, including diagonal unitaries, 2-by-2 block diagonal unitaries, and quantum state preparation (QSP) unitaries, the last being a fundamental task used in many quantum algorithms for machine learning and linear algebra.
Pei Yuan, Jonathan Allcock, Shengyu Zhang 0002
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.1
2023 Exact quantum query complexity of weight decision problems via Chebyshev polynomials
Xiaoming Sun 0001, Guang Yang 0020, Pei Yuan
Sci. China Inf. Sci.4
2023 Asymptotically Optimal Circuit Depth for Quantum State Preparation and General Unitary Synthesis
abstract
The Quantum State Preparation problem aims to prepare an n-qubit quantum state |ψv=k=02n-1vk|k from the initial state |0n, for a given unit vector v=(v0,v1,v2,v2n-1)TC2n with ||v||2=1. The problem is of fundamental importance in quantum algorithm design, Hamiltonian simulation and quantum machine learning, yet its circuit depth complexity remains open when ancillary qubits are available. In this paper, we study quantum circuits when there are m ancillary qubits available. We construct, for any m, circuits that can prepare |ψvin depth Õ(2nm+n+n) and size O(2n), achieving the optimal value for both measures simultaneously. These results also imply a depth complexity of (4nm+n) for quantum circuits implementing a general n-qubit unitary for any m≤O(2n/n) number of ancillary qubits. This resolves the depth complexity for circuits without ancillary qubits. And for circuits with exponentially many ancillary qubits, our result quadratically improves the currently best upper bound of O(4n) to ˜(2n). Our circuits are deterministic, prepare the state and carry out the unitary precisely, utilize the ancillary qubits tightly and the depths are optimal in a wide parameter regime. The results can be viewed as (optimal) time-space trade-off bounds, which is not only theoretically interesting, but also practically relevant in the current trend that the number of qubits starts to take off, by showing a way to use a large number of qubits to compensate the short qubit lifetime.
Xiaoming Sun 0001, Guojing Tian, Pei Yuan, Shengyu Zhang 0002
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.4
2021 A tongue features fusion approach to predicting prediabetes and diabetes with machine learning
Pei Yuan, Jingbin Huang, Longtao Cui, Ji Cui, Xuxiang Ma, Tao Jiang 0032, Xinghua Yao, Jiacai Li, Yulin Shi, Zijuan Bi, Yu Wang 0129, Hong-yuan Fu, Ching-Hsuan Pai, Xiao-jing Guo, Jiatuo Xu
J. Biomed. Informatics2
2019 A Quantum-inspired Classical Algorithm for Separable Non-negative Matrix Factorization
abstract
Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) asks to decompose a (entry-wise) non-negative matrix into the product of two smaller-sized nonnegative matrices, which has been shown intractable in general. In order to overcome this issue, separability assumption is introduced which assumes all data points are in a conical hull. This assumption makes NMF tractable and widely used in text analysis and image processing, but still impractical for huge-scale datasets. In this paper, inspired by recent development on dequantizing techniques, we propose a new classical algorithm for separable NMF problem. Our new algorithm runs in polynomial time in the rank and logarithmic in the size of input matrices, which achieves an exponential speedup in the low-rank setting.
Zhihuai Chen, Yinan Li 0004, Xiaoming Sun 0001, Pei Yuan, Jialin Zhang 0001
IJCAI4