Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ronan Fruit

dblp:198/1167 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Reinforcement learning · 81% Representation and self-supervised learning · 10% Learning theory · 10%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration-exploitation tradeoff
1.032019
Exploration Bonus for Regret Minimization in Discrete and Continuous Average Reward MDPs · NeurIPS 2019
Near Optimal Exploration-Exploitation in Non-Communicating Markov Decision Processes · NeurIPS 2018
Efficient Bias-Span-Constrained Exploration-Exploitation in Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization
1.032019
Exploration Bonus for Regret Minimization in Discrete and Continuous Average Reward MDPs · NeurIPS 2019
Near Optimal Exploration-Exploitation in Non-Communicating Markov Decision Processes · NeurIPS 2018
Regret Minimization in MDPs with Options without Prior Knowledge · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process › infinite-horizon markov decision process
average-reward MDP
0.412019
Exploration Bonus for Regret Minimization in Discrete and Continuous Average Reward MDPs · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration bonus
0.412019
Exploration Bonus for Regret Minimization in Discrete and Continuous Average Reward MDPs · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds
0.412019
Regret Bounds for Learning State Representations in Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning
state representation learning
0.412019
Regret Bounds for Learning State Representations in Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning
temporal abstraction
0.312017
Regret Minimization in MDPs with Options without Prior Knowledge · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process
continuous state MDPs
0.112019
Exploration Bonus for Regret Minimization in Discrete and Continuous Average Reward MDPs · NeurIPS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

markov decision process · 0.7upper confidence bound · 0.4extended value iteration · 0.4regret bound analysis · 0.3regret analysis · 0.3posterior sampling · 0.3UCRL · 0.3semi-MDP · 0.3options framework · 0.3UCRL-SMDP · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Regret Bounds for Learning State Representations in Reinforcement Learning
abstract
We consider the problem of online reinforcement learning when several state representations (mapping histories to a discrete state space) are available to the learning agent. At least one of these representations is assumed to induce a Markov decision process (MDP), and the performance of the agent is measured in terms of cumulative regret against the optimal policy giving the highest average reward in this MDP representation. We propose an algorithm (UCB-MS) with O(sqrt(T)) regret in any communicating Markov decision process. The regret bound shows that UCB-MS automatically adapts to the Markov model. This improves over the currently known best results in the literature that gave regret bounds of order O(T^(2/3)).
Ronald Ortner, Matteo Pirotta, Alessandro Lazaric, Ronan Fruit, Odalric-Ambrym Maillard
NeurIPS4
2019 Exploration Bonus for Regret Minimization in Discrete and Continuous Average Reward MDPs
abstract
The exploration bonus is an effective approach to manage the exploration-exploitation trade-off in Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). While it has been analyzed in infinite-horizon discounted and finite-horizon problems, we focus on designing and analysing the exploration bonus in the more challenging infinite-horizon undiscounted setting. We first introduce SCAL+, a variant of SCAL (Fruit et al. 2018), that uses a suitable exploration bonus to solve any discrete unknown weakly-communicating MDP for which an upper bound $c$ on the span of the optimal bias function is known. We prove that SCAL+ enjoys the same regret guarantees as SCAL, which relies on the less efficient extended value iteration approach. Furthermore, we leverage the flexibility provided by the exploration bonus scheme to generalize SCAL+ to smooth MDPs with continuous state space and discrete actions. We show that the resulting algorithm (SCCAL+) achieves the same regret bound as UCCRL (Ortner and Ryabko, 2012) while being the first implementable algorithm for this setting.
Jian Qian, Ronan Fruit, Matteo Pirotta, Alessandro Lazaric
NeurIPS2
2018 Efficient Bias-Span-Constrained Exploration-Exploitation in Reinforcement Learning
abstract
We introduce SCAL, an algorithm designed to perform efficient exploration-exploration in any unknown weakly-communicating Markov Decision Process (MDP) for which an upper bound c on the span of the optimal bias function is known. For an MDP with $S$ states, $A$ actions and $\Gamma \leq S$ possible next states, we prove a regret bound of $O(c\sqrt{\Gamma SAT})$, which significantly improves over existing algorithms (e.g., UCRL and PSRL), whose regret scales linearly with the MDP diameter $D$. In fact, the optimal bias span is finite and often much smaller than $D$ (e.g., $D=+\infty$ in non-communicating MDPs). A similar result was originally derived by Bartlett and Tewari (2009) for REGAL.C, for which no tractable algorithm is available. In this paper, we relax the optimization problem at the core of REGAL.C, we carefully analyze its properties, and we provide the first computationally efficient algorithm to solve it. Finally, we report numerical simulations supporting our theoretical findings and showing how SCAL significantly outperforms UCRL in MDPs with large diameter and small span.
Ronan Fruit, Matteo Pirotta, Alessandro Lazaric, Ronald Ortner
ICML1
2018 Near Optimal Exploration-Exploitation in Non-Communicating Markov Decision Processes
abstract
While designing the state space of an MDP, it is common to include states that are transient or not reachable by any policy (e.g., in mountain car, the product space of speed and position contains configurations that are not physically reachable). This results in weakly-communicating or multi-chain MDPs. In this paper, we introduce TUCRL, the first algorithm able to perform efficient exploration-exploitation in any finite Markov Decision Process (MDP) without requiring any form of prior knowledge. In particular, for any MDP with $S^c$ communicating states, $A$ actions and $\Gamma^c \leq S^c$ possible communicating next states, we derive a $O(D^c \sqrt{\Gamma^c S^c A T}) regret bound, where $D^c$ is the diameter (i.e., the length of the longest shortest path between any two states) of the communicating part of the MDP. This is in contrast with optimistic algorithms (e.g., UCRL, Optimistic PSRL) that suffer linear regret in weakly-communicating MDPs, as well as posterior sampling or regularised algorithms (e.g., REGAL), which require prior knowledge on the bias span of the optimal policy to bias the exploration to achieve sub-linear regret. We also prove that in weakly-communicating MDPs, no algorithm can ever achieve a logarithmic growth of the regret without first suffering a linear regret for a number of steps that is exponential in the parameters of the MDP. Finally, we report numerical simulations supporting our theoretical findings and showing how TUCRL overcomes the limitations of the state-of-the-art.
Ronan Fruit, Matteo Pirotta, Alessandro Lazaric
NeurIPS1
2017 Exploration-Exploitation in MDPs with Options
abstract
While a large body of empirical results show that temporally-extended actions and options may significantly affect the learning performance of an agent, the theoretical understanding of how and when options can be beneficial in online reinforcement learning is relatively limited. In this paper, we derive an upper and lower bound on the regret of a variant of UCRL using options. While we first analyze the algorithm in the general case of semi-Markov decision processes (SMDPs), we show how these results can be translated to the specific case of MDPs with options and we illustrate simple scenarios in which the regret of learning with options can be provably much smaller than the regret suffered when learning with primitive actions.
Ronan Fruit, Alessandro Lazaric
AISTATS1
2017 Regret Minimization in MDPs with Options without Prior Knowledge
abstract
The option framework integrates temporal abstraction into the reinforcement learning model through the introduction of macro-actions (i.e., options). Recent works leveraged on the mapping of Markov decision processes (MDPs) with options to semi-MDPs (SMDPs) and introduced SMDP-versions of exploration-exploitation algorithms (e.g., RMAX-SMDP and UCRL-SMDP) to analyze the impact of options on the learning performance. Nonetheless, the PAC-SMDP sample complexity of RMAX-SMDP can hardly be translated into equivalent PAC-MDP theoretical guarantees, while UCRL-SMDP requires prior knowledge of the parameters characterizing the distributions of the cumulative reward and duration of each option, which are hardly available in practice. In this paper, we remove this limitation by combining the SMDP view together with the inner Markov structure of options into a novel algorithm whose regret performance matches UCRL-SMDP's up to an additive regret term. We show scenarios where this term is negligible and the advantage of temporal abstraction is preserved. We also report preliminary empirical result supporting the theoretical findings.
Ronan Fruit, Matteo Pirotta, Alessandro Lazaric, Emma Brunskill
NIPS1