Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jason Andrew Wolfe

dblp:198/5696 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 57% Question answering and dialogue systems · 22% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 12%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Distributed and cloud data management · 50% Machine learning and data management · 50%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing
0.712023
ZEROTOP: Zero-Shot Task-Oriented Semantic Parsing using Large Language Models · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
task-oriented semantic parsing
0.712023
ZEROTOP: Zero-Shot Task-Oriented Semantic Parsing using Large Language Models · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue understanding
conversational semantic parsing
0.512021
Value-Agnostic Conversational Semantic Parsing · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot learning
0.212023
ZEROTOP: Zero-Shot Task-Oriented Semantic Parsing using Large Language Models · EMNLP 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
classical planning
0.112011
Bounded Intention Planning · IJCAI 2011
Machine learning and data management › scalable machine learning
distributed learning
0.112008
Fully distributed EM for very large datasets · ICML 2008
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › tree search
AND/OR search
0.112005
Efficient belief-state AND-OR search, with application to Kriegspiel · IJCAI 2005
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
belief state search
0.112005
Efficient belief-state AND-OR search, with application to Kriegspiel · IJCAI 2005
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
state space search
0.012011
Bounded Intention Planning · IJCAI 2011
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
game tree search
0.012005
Efficient belief-state AND-OR search, with application to Kriegspiel · IJCAI 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

synthetic negative samples · 0.7large language model prompting · 0.7value-agnostic parsing · 0.5SAS+ planning · 0.1mapreduce · 0.1junction-tree topology · 0.1expectation-maximization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 ZEROTOP: Zero-Shot Task-Oriented Semantic Parsing using Large Language Models
abstract
We explore the use of large language models (LLMs) for zero-shot semantic parsing.Semantic parsing involves mapping natural language utterances to task-specific meaning representations.LLMs are generally trained on publicly available text and code and cannot be expected to directly generalize to domain-specific parsing tasks in a zero-shot setting.In this work, we propose ZEROTOP, a zero-shot task-oriented parsing method that decomposes semantic parsing problem into a set of abstractive and extractive question-answering (QA) problems.For each utterance, we prompt the LLM with questions corresponding to its top-level intent and a set of slots and use the LLM generations to construct the target meaning representation.We observe that current LLMs fail to detect unanswerable questions; and as a result, cannot handle questions corresponding to missing slots.We address this by fine-tuning a language model on public QA datasets using synthetic negative samples.Experimental results show that our QA-based decomposition paired with the fine-tuned LLM can zero-shot parse ≈ 16% of utterances in the MTOP dataset. * Work done during an internship at Microsoft Semantic Machines.♠ Work done while at Microsoft Semantic Machines.
Dheeraj Mekala, Jason Andrew Wolfe, Subhro Roy
EMNLP2
2021 Value-Agnostic Conversational Semantic Parsing
abstract
Emmanouil Antonios Platanios, Adam Pauls, Subhro Roy, Yuchen Zhang, Alexander Kyte, Alan Guo, Sam Thomson, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Jason Wolfe, Jacob Andreas, Dan Klein. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021.
Emmanouil A. Platanios, Adam Pauls, Subhro Roy, Yuchen Zhang 0002, Alexander Kyte, Alan Guo, Sam Thomson, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Jason Andrew Wolfe, Jacob Andreas, Daniel Klein 0001
ACL/IJCNLP (1)9
2020 Task-Oriented Dialogue as Dataflow Synthesis
abstract
We describe an approach to task-oriented dialogue in which dialogue state is represented as a dataflow graph. A dialogue agent maps each user utterance to a program that extends this graph. Programs include metacomputation operators for reference and revision that reuse dataflow fragments from previous turns. Our graph-based state enables the expression and manipulation of complex user intents, and explicit metacomputation makes these intents easier for learned models to predict. We introduce a new dataset, SMCalFlow, featuring complex dialogues about events, weather, places, and people. Experiments show that dataflow graphs and metacomputation substantially improve representability and predictability in these natural dialogues. Additional experiments on the MultiWOZ dataset show that our dataflow representation enables an otherwise off-the-shelf sequence-to-sequence model to match the best existing task-specific state tracking model. The SMCalFlow dataset, code for replicating experiments, and a public leaderboard are available at https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/dataflow-based-dialogue-semantic-machines .
Jacob Andreas, John Bufe, David Burkett, Josh Clausman, Jean Crawford, Kate Crim, Jordan DeLoach, Leah Dorner, Jason Eisner, Hao Fang 0002, Alan Guo, David Hall 0006, Kristin Hayes, Kellie Hill, Diana Ho, Wendy Iwaszuk, Smriti Jha, Daniel Klein 0001, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Theo Lanman, Percy Liang, Christopher H. Lin, Ilya Lintsbakh, Andy McGovern, Aleksandr Nisnevich, Adam Pauls, Dmitrij Petters, Brent Read, Dan Roth 0001, Subhro Roy, Jesse Rusak, Beth Short, Div Slomin, Ben Snyder, Stephon Striplin, Yu Su 0001, Zachary Tellman, Sam Thomson, Andrei Vorobev, Izabela Witoszko, Jason Andrew Wolfe, Abby Wray, Yuchen Zhang 0002, Alexander Zotov
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics42
2011 Bounded Intention Planning
abstract
We propose a novel approach for solving unary SAS + planning problems. This approach extends an SAS + instance with new state variables representing intentions about how each original state variable will be used or changed next, and splits the original actions into several stages of intention followed by eventual execution. The result is a new SAS + instance with the same basic solutions as the original. While the transformed problem is larger, it has additional structure that can be exploited to reduce the branching factor, leading to reachable state spaces that are many orders of magnitude smaller (and hence much faster planning) in several test domains with acyclic causal graphs. 1
Jason Andrew Wolfe, Stuart Russell 0001
IJCAI1
2008 Fully distributed EM for very large datasets
abstract
In EM and related algorithms, E-step computations distribute easily, because data items are independent given parameters. For very large data sets, however, even storing all of the parameters in a single node for the M-step can be impractical. We present a framework that fully distributes the entire EM procedure. Each node interacts only with parameters relevant to its data, sending messages to other nodes along a junction-tree topology. We demonstrate improvements over a MapReduce topology, on two tasks: word alignment and topic modeling.
Jason Andrew Wolfe, Aria Haghighi, Daniel Klein 0001
ICML1
2005 Efficient belief-state AND-OR search, with application to Kriegspiel
Stuart Russell 0001, Jason Andrew Wolfe
IJCAI2