Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jason Andrew Wolfe
dblp:198/5696
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 57% Question answering and dialogue systems · 22% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 12% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Distributed and cloud data management · 50% Machine learning and data management · 50% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ZEROTOP: Zero-Shot Task-Oriented Semantic Parsing using Large Language Models · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › semantic parsing
task-oriented semantic parsing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ZEROTOP: Zero-Shot Task-Oriented Semantic Parsing using Large Language Models · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue understanding
conversational semantic parsing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Value-Agnostic Conversational Semantic Parsing · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | ZEROTOP: Zero-Shot Task-Oriented Semantic Parsing using Large Language Models · EMNLP 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
classical planning |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Bounded Intention Planning · IJCAI 2011 |
Machine learning and data management › scalable machine learning
distributed learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Fully distributed EM for very large datasets · ICML 2008 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › tree search
AND/OR search |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Efficient belief-state AND-OR search, with application to Kriegspiel · IJCAI 2005 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
belief state search |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Efficient belief-state AND-OR search, with application to Kriegspiel · IJCAI 2005 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
state space search |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Bounded Intention Planning · IJCAI 2011 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
game tree search |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Efficient belief-state AND-OR search, with application to Kriegspiel · IJCAI 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synthetic negative samples · 0.7large language model prompting · 0.7value-agnostic parsing · 0.5SAS+ planning · 0.1mapreduce · 0.1junction-tree topology · 0.1expectation-maximization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | ZEROTOP: Zero-Shot Task-Oriented Semantic Parsing using Large Language ModelsabstractWe explore the use of large language models (LLMs) for zero-shot semantic parsing.Semantic parsing involves mapping natural language utterances to task-specific meaning representations.LLMs are generally trained on publicly available text and code and cannot be expected to directly generalize to domain-specific parsing tasks in a zero-shot setting.In this work, we propose ZEROTOP, a zero-shot task-oriented parsing method that decomposes semantic parsing problem into a set of abstractive and extractive question-answering (QA) problems.For each utterance, we prompt the LLM with questions corresponding to its top-level intent and a set of slots and use the LLM generations to construct the target meaning representation.We observe that current LLMs fail to detect unanswerable questions; and as a result, cannot handle questions corresponding to missing slots.We address this by fine-tuning a language model on public QA datasets using synthetic negative samples.Experimental results show that our QA-based decomposition paired with the fine-tuned LLM can zero-shot parse ≈ 16% of utterances in the MTOP dataset. * Work done during an internship at Microsoft Semantic Machines.♠ Work done while at Microsoft Semantic Machines. Dheeraj Mekala, Jason Andrew Wolfe, Subhro Roy |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2021 | Value-Agnostic Conversational Semantic ParsingabstractEmmanouil Antonios Platanios, Adam Pauls, Subhro Roy, Yuchen Zhang, Alexander Kyte, Alan Guo, Sam Thomson, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Jason Wolfe, Jacob Andreas, Dan Klein. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021. Emmanouil A. Platanios, Adam Pauls, Subhro Roy, Yuchen Zhang 0002, Alexander Kyte, Alan Guo, Sam Thomson, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Jason Andrew Wolfe, Jacob Andreas, Daniel Klein 0001 |
ACL/IJCNLP (1) | 9 |
| 2020 | Task-Oriented Dialogue as Dataflow SynthesisabstractWe describe an approach to task-oriented dialogue in which dialogue state is represented as a dataflow graph. A dialogue agent maps each user utterance to a program that extends this graph. Programs include metacomputation operators for reference and revision that reuse dataflow fragments from previous turns. Our graph-based state enables the expression and manipulation of complex user intents, and explicit metacomputation makes these intents easier for learned models to predict. We introduce a new dataset, SMCalFlow, featuring complex dialogues about events, weather, places, and people. Experiments show that dataflow graphs and metacomputation substantially improve representability and predictability in these natural dialogues. Additional experiments on the MultiWOZ dataset show that our dataflow representation enables an otherwise off-the-shelf sequence-to-sequence model to match the best existing task-specific state tracking model. The SMCalFlow dataset, code for replicating experiments, and a public leaderboard are available at https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/dataflow-based-dialogue-semantic-machines . Jacob Andreas, John Bufe, David Burkett, Josh Clausman, Jean Crawford, Kate Crim, Jordan DeLoach, Leah Dorner, Jason Eisner, Hao Fang 0002, Alan Guo, David Hall 0006, Kristin Hayes, Kellie Hill, Diana Ho, Wendy Iwaszuk, Smriti Jha, Daniel Klein 0001, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Theo Lanman, Percy Liang, Christopher H. Lin, Ilya Lintsbakh, Andy McGovern, Aleksandr Nisnevich, Adam Pauls, Dmitrij Petters, Brent Read, Dan Roth 0001, Subhro Roy, Jesse Rusak, Beth Short, Div Slomin, Ben Snyder, Stephon Striplin, Yu Su 0001, Zachary Tellman, Sam Thomson, Andrei Vorobev, Izabela Witoszko, Jason Andrew Wolfe, Abby Wray, Yuchen Zhang 0002, Alexander Zotov |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 42 |
| 2011 | Bounded Intention PlanningabstractWe propose a novel approach for solving unary SAS + planning problems. This approach extends an SAS + instance with new state variables representing intentions about how each original state variable will be used or changed next, and splits the original actions into several stages of intention followed by eventual execution. The result is a new SAS + instance with the same basic solutions as the original. While the transformed problem is larger, it has additional structure that can be exploited to reduce the branching factor, leading to reachable state spaces that are many orders of magnitude smaller (and hence much faster planning) in several test domains with acyclic causal graphs. 1 Jason Andrew Wolfe, Stuart Russell 0001 |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2008 | Fully distributed EM for very large datasetsabstractIn EM and related algorithms, E-step computations distribute easily, because data items are independent given parameters. For very large data sets, however, even storing all of the parameters in a single node for the M-step can be impractical. We present a framework that fully distributes the entire EM procedure. Each node interacts only with parameters relevant to its data, sending messages to other nodes along a junction-tree topology. We demonstrate improvements over a MapReduce topology, on two tasks: word alignment and topic modeling. Jason Andrew Wolfe, Aria Haghighi, Daniel Klein 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2005 | Efficient belief-state AND-OR search, with application to Kriegspiel
Stuart Russell 0001, Jason Andrew Wolfe |
IJCAI | 2 |