Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hajime Taira
dblp:198/9241
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-3398-4395ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
3D vision · 87% Robot navigation and mapping · 11% Autonomous driving · 2% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
visual localization |
2.0 | 5 | 2021 | Are Large-Scale 3D Models Really Necessary for Accurate Visual Localization? · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 InLoc: Indoor Visual Localization with Dense Matching and View Synthesis · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 Is This the Right Place? Geometric-Semantic Pose Verification for Indoor Visual Localization · ICCV 2019 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › GPS-denied localization
indoor localization |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | InLoc: Indoor Visual Localization with Dense Matching and View Synthesis · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 Is This the Right Place? Geometric-Semantic Pose Verification for Indoor Visual Localization · ICCV 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › visual localization
image retrieval-based localization |
0.8 | 2 | 2021 | Are Large-Scale 3D Models Really Necessary for Accurate Visual Localization? · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 Are Large-Scale 3D Models Really Necessary for Accurate Visual Localization? · CVPR 2017 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation |
0.7 | 2 | 2021 | Are Large-Scale 3D Models Really Necessary for Accurate Visual Localization? · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 InLoc: Indoor Visual Localization with Dense Matching and View Synthesis · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Self-Supervised Ego-Motion Estimation Based on Multi-Layer Fusion of RGB and Inferred Depth · ICRA 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Self-Supervised Ego-Motion Estimation Based on Multi-Layer Fusion of RGB and Inferred Depth · ICRA 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
ego-motion estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Self-Supervised Ego-Motion Estimation Based on Multi-Layer Fusion of RGB and Inferred Depth · ICRA 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure from motion |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Are Large-Scale 3D Models Really Necessary for Accurate Visual Localization? · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
object pose estimation |
0.5 | 2 | 2021 | InLoc: Indoor Visual Localization With Dense Matching and View Synthesis · CVPR 2018 InLoc: Indoor Visual Localization with Dense Matching and View Synthesis · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera pose estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | InLoc: Indoor Visual Localization With Dense Matching and View Synthesis · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › visual localization
indoor visual localization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | InLoc: Indoor Visual Localization With Dense Matching and View Synthesis · CVPR 2018 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Self-Supervised Ego-Motion Estimation Based on Multi-Layer Fusion of RGB and Inferred Depth · ICRA 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation › self-supervised depth estimation
self-supervised depth and ego-motion estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Self-Supervised Ego-Motion Estimation Based on Multi-Layer Fusion of RGB and Inferred Depth · ICRA 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Are Large-Scale 3D Models Really Necessary for Accurate Visual Localization? · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
novel view synthesis |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | InLoc: Indoor Visual Localization With Dense Matching and View Synthesis · CVPR 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
image retrieval · 0.8dense matching · 0.8self-supervised learning · 0.6multi-layer fusion · 0.6view synthesis · 0.5structure-based pose estimation · 0.5trainable verification · 0.4geometric-semantic verification · 0.4pose verification · 0.3local reconstruction · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Self-Supervised Ego-Motion Estimation Based on Multi-Layer Fusion of RGB and Inferred DepthabstractIn existing self-supervised depth and ego-motion estimation methods, ego-motion estimation is usually limited to only leveraging RGB information. Recently, several methods have been proposed to further improve the accuracy of self-supervised ego-motion estimation by fusing information from other modalities, e.g., depth, acceleration, and angular velocity. However, they rarely focus on how different fusion strategies affect performance. In this paper, we investigate the effect of different fusion strategies for ego-motion estimation and pro-pose a new framework for self-supervised learning of depth and ego-motion estimation, which performs ego-motion estimation by leveraging RGB and inferred depth information in a Multi-Layer Fusion manner. As a result, we have achieved state-of-the-art performance among learning-based methods on the KITTI odometry benchmark. Detailed studies on the design choices of leveraging inferred depth information and fusion strategies have also been carried out, which clearly demonstrate the advantages of our proposed framework.3 Zijie Jiang, Hajime Taira, Naoyuki Miyashita, Masatoshi Okutomi |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2021 | InLoc: Indoor Visual Localization with Dense Matching and View SynthesisabstractWe seek to predict the 6 degree-of-freedom (6DoF) pose of a query photograph with respect to a large indoor 3D map. The contributions of this work are three-fold. First, we develop a new large-scale visual localization method targeted for indoor spaces. The method proceeds along three steps: (i) efficient retrieval of candidate poses that scales to large-scale environments, (ii) pose estimation using dense matching rather than sparse local features to deal with weakly textured indoor scenes, and (iii) pose verification by virtual view synthesis that is robust to significant changes in viewpoint, scene layout, and occlusion. Second, we release a new dataset with reference 6DoF poses for large-scale indoor localization. Query photographs are captured by mobile phones at a different time than the reference 3D map, thus presenting a realistic indoor localization scenario. Third, we demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms current state-of-the-art indoor localization approaches on this new challenging data. Code and data are publicly available. Hajime Taira, Masatoshi Okutomi, Torsten Sattler, Mircea Cimpoi, Marc Pollefeys, Josef Sivic, Tomás Pajdla, Akihiko Torii |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2021 | Are Large-Scale 3D Models Really Necessary for Accurate Visual Localization?abstractAccurate visual localization is a key technology for autonomous navigation. 3D structure-based methods employ 3D models of the scene to estimate the full 6 degree-of-freedom (DOF) pose of a camera very accurately. However, constructing (and extending) large-scale 3D models is still a significant challenge. In contrast, 2D image retrieval-based methods only require a database of geo-tagged images, which is trivial to construct and to maintain. They are often considered inaccurate since they only approximate the positions of the cameras. Yet, the exact camera pose can theoretically be recovered when enough relevant database images are retrieved. In this paper, we demonstrate experimentally that large-scale 3D models are not strictly necessary for accurate visual localization. We create reference poses for a large and challenging urban dataset. Using these poses, we show that combining image-based methods with local reconstructions results in a higher pose accuracy compared to state-of-the-art structure-based methods, albeight at higher run-time costs. We show that some of these run-time costs can be alleviated by exploiting known database image poses. Our results suggest that we might want to reconsider the need for large-scale 3D models in favor of more local models, but also that further research is necessary to accelerate the local reconstruction process. Akihiko Torii, Hajime Taira, Josef Sivic, Marc Pollefeys, Masatoshi Okutomi, Tomás Pajdla, Torsten Sattler |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2019 | Is This the Right Place? Geometric-Semantic Pose Verification for Indoor Visual LocalizationabstractVisual localization in large and complex indoor scenes, dominated by weakly textured rooms and repeating geometric patterns, is a challenging problem with high practical relevance for applications such as Augmented Reality and robotics. To handle the ambiguities arising in this scenario, a common strategy is, first, to generate multiple estimates for the camera pose from which a given query image was taken. The pose with the largest geometric consistency with the query image, e.g., in the form of an inlier count, is then selected in a second stage. While a significant amount of research has concentrated on the first stage, there has been considerably less work on the second stage. In this paper, we thus focus on pose verification. We show that combining different modalities, namely appearance, geometry, and semantics, considerably boosts pose verification and consequently pose accuracy. We develop multiple hand-crafted as well as a trainable approach to join into the geometric-semantic verification and show significant improvements over state-of-the-art on a very challenging indoor dataset. Hajime Taira, Ignacio Rocco, Jirí Sedlár, Masatoshi Okutomi, Josef Sivic, Tomás Pajdla, Torsten Sattler, Akihiko Torii |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2018 | InLoc: Indoor Visual Localization With Dense Matching and View SynthesisabstractWe seek to predict the 6 degree-of-freedom (6DoF) pose of a query photograph with respect to a large indoor 3D map. The contributions of this work are three-fold. First, we develop a new large-scale visual localization method targeted for indoor environments. The method proceeds along three steps: (i) efficient retrieval of candidate poses that ensures scalability to large-scale environments, (ii) pose estimation using dense matching rather than local features to deal with texture less indoor scenes, and (iii) pose verification by virtual view synthesis to cope with significant changes in viewpoint, scene layout, and occluders. Second, we collect a new dataset with reference 6DoF poses for large-scale indoor localization. Query photographs are captured by mobile phones at a different time than the reference 3D map, thus presenting a realistic indoor localization scenario. Third, we demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms current state-of-the-art indoor localization approaches on this new challenging data. Hajime Taira, Masatoshi Okutomi, Torsten Sattler, Mircea Cimpoi, Marc Pollefeys, Josef Sivic, Tomás Pajdla, Akihiko Torii |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2017 | Are Large-Scale 3D Models Really Necessary for Accurate Visual Localization?abstractAccurate visual localization is a key technology for autonomous navigation. 3D structure-based methods employ 3D models of the scene to estimate the full 6DOF pose of a camera very accurately. However, constructing (and extending) large-scale 3D models is still a significant challenge. In contrast, 2D image retrieval-based methods only require a database of geo-tagged images, which is trivial to construct and to maintain. They are often considered inaccurate since they only approximate the positions of the cameras. Yet, the exact camera pose can theoretically be recovered when enough relevant database images are retrieved. In this paper, we demonstrate experimentally that large-scale 3D models are not strictly necessary for accurate visual localization. We create reference poses for a large and challenging urban dataset. Using these poses, we show that combining image-based methods with local reconstructions results in a pose accuracy similar to the state-of-the-art structure-based methods. Our results suggest that we might want to reconsider the current approach for accurate large-scale localization. Torsten Sattler, Akihiko Torii, Josef Sivic, Marc Pollefeys, Hajime Taira, Masatoshi Okutomi, Tomás Pajdla |
CVPR | 5 |
| 2016 | Robust feature matching by learning descriptor covariance with viewpoint synthesisabstractFor images taken from very different viewpoints, we propose a new feature matching algorithm that provides accurate matches while preserving high matchability. Our method first synthesizes images by simulating the viewpoint changes. It then learns variation of local feature descriptors induced by the viewpoint changes. Finally, we robustly match feature descriptors by measuring the similarity using the learned variation. Our method is particularly useful for matching new query images to target image archived in a database. We demonstrate the benefits of the proposed method in terms of accuracy and computational time through experiments using several wide-baseline image datasets. Hajime Taira, Akihiko Torii, Masatoshi Okutomi |
ICPR | 1 |