Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Duarte Patrício

dblp:199/1871 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Operating systems › resource management
memory management
0.412019
Runtime Object Lifetime Profiler for Latency Sensitive Big Data Applications · EuroSys 2019
Cloud and datacenter computing
big data platform
0.112019
Runtime Object Lifetime Profiler for Latency Sensitive Big Data Applications · EuroSys 2019
Cloud and datacenter computing
latency-critical applications
0.112019
Runtime Object Lifetime Profiler for Latency Sensitive Big Data Applications · EuroSys 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

profiling · 0.8memory fragmentation analysis · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Runtime Object Lifetime Profiler for Latency Sensitive Big Data Applications
abstract
Latency sensitive services such as credit-card fraud detection and website targeted advertisement rely on Big Data platforms which run on top of memory managed runtimes, such as the Java Virtual Machine (JVM). These platforms, however, suffer from unpredictable and unacceptably high pause times due to inadequate memory management decisions (e.g., allocating objects with very different lifetimes next to each other, resulting in severe memory fragmentation). This leads to frequent and long application pause times, breaking Service Level Agreements (SLAs). This problem has been previously identified, and results show that current memory management techniques are ill-suited for applications that hold in memory massive amounts of long-lived objects (which is the case for a wide spectrum of Big Data applications).
Rodrigo Bruno, Duarte Patrício, José Simão, Luís Veiga, Paulo Ferreira 0001
EuroSys2