Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Salman Mohammed

dblp:199/2172 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 44% Web and social media mining · 39% Data mining · 17%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
interactive information retrieval
0.312018
Update Delivery Mechanisms for Prospective Information Needs: An Analysis of Attention in Mobile Users · SIGIR 2018
Information retrieval › text summarization › temporal summarization
real-time summarization
0.312018
Update Delivery Mechanisms for Prospective Information Needs: An Analysis of Attention in Mobile Users · SIGIR 2018
Web and social media mining
event detection
0.312017
Event Detection on Curated Tweet Streams · SIGIR 2017
Web and social media mining › event detection
social event detection
0.312017
Event Detection on Curated Tweet Streams · SIGIR 2017
Data mining › text mining › text classification
topic classification
0.312017
Event Detection on Curated Tweet Streams · SIGIR 2017
Information retrieval
user behavior
0.112018
Update Delivery Mechanisms for Prospective Information Needs: An Analysis of Attention in Mobile Users · SIGIR 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cluster analysis · 0.3topic classification · 0.3distant supervision · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Update Delivery Mechanisms for Prospective Information Needs: An Analysis of Attention in Mobile Users
abstract
Real-time summarization systems that monitor document streams to identify relevant content have a few options for delivering system updates to users. In a mobile context, systems could send push notifications to users' mobile devices, hoping to grab their attention immediately. Alternatively, systems could silently deposit updates into "inboxes" that users can access at their leisure. We refer to these mechanisms as push-based vs. pull-based, and present a two-year contrastive study that attempts to understand the effects of the delivery mechanism on mobile user behavior, in the context of the TREC Real-Time Summarization Tracks. Through a cluster analysis, we are able to identify three distinct and coherent patterns of behavior. As expected, we find that users are likely to ignore push notifications, but for those updates that users do pay attention to, content is consumed within a short amount of time. Interestingly, users bombarded with push notifications are less likely to consume updates on their own initiative and less likely to engage in long reading sessions---which is a common pattern for users who pull content from their inboxes. We characterize users as exhibiting "eager" or "apathetic" information consumption behavior as an explanation of these observations, and attempt to operationalize our findings into design recommendations.
Jimmy Lin, Salman Mohammed, Royal Sequiera, Luchen Tan
SIGIR2
2017 Event Detection on Curated Tweet Streams
abstract
We present a system for identifying interesting social media posts on Twitter and delivering them to users' mobile devices in real time as push notifications. In our problem formulation, users are interested in broad topics such as politics, sports, and entertainment: our system processes tweets in real time to identify relevant, novel, and salient content. There are three interesting aspects to our work: First, instead of attempting to tame the cacophony of unfiltered tweets, we exploit a smaller, but still sizeable, collection of curated tweet streams corresponding to the Twitter accounts of different media outlets. Second, we apply distant supervision to extract topic labels from curated streams that have a specific focus, which can then be leveraged to build high-quality topic classifiers essentially "for free". Finally, our system delivers content via Twitter direct messages, supporting in situ interactions modeled after conversations with intelligent agents. These ideas are demonstrated in an end-to-end working prototype.
Nimesh Ghelani, Salman Mohammed, Shine Wang, Jimmy Lin
SIGIR2