VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ardavan Saeedi
dblp:20/11107
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
5as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7763-7980ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 5 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
10 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 28% Trustworthy machine learning · 20% Language models and text generation · 18% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 28 heaviest of 31, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › in-context learning
demonstration selection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LLMs are Better Than You Think: Label-Guided In-Context Learning for Named Entity Recognition · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LLMs are Better Than You Think: Label-Guided In-Context Learning for Named Entity Recognition · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LLMs are Better Than You Think: Label-Guided In-Context Learning for Named Entity Recognition · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.9 | 2 | 2022 | Knowledge Distillation via Constrained Variational Inference · AAAI 2022 Variational Particle Approximations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Knowledge Distillation via Constrained Variational Inference · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › Data-centric AI
annotator modeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning From Noisy Labels by Regularized Estimation of Annotator Confusion · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
learning with noisy labels |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning From Noisy Labels by Regularized Estimation of Annotator Confusion · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
counterfactual explanation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | ExplainGAN: Model Explanation via Decision Boundary Crossing Transformations · ECCV (10) 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | ExplainGAN: Model Explanation via Decision Boundary Crossing Transformations · ECCV (10) 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Variational Particle Approximations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning: Integrating Temporal Abstraction and Intrinsic Motivation · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
hidden markov model |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The Segmented iHMM: A Simple, Efficient Hierarchical Infinite HMM · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hierarchical reinforcement learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning: Integrating Temporal Abstraction and Intrinsic Motivation · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › hidden markov model
infinite hidden markov model |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The Segmented iHMM: A Simple, Efficient Hierarchical Infinite HMM · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
intrinsic motivation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning: Integrating Temporal Abstraction and Intrinsic Motivation · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning
temporal abstraction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning: Integrating Temporal Abstraction and Intrinsic Motivation · NIPS 2016 |
Data mining › time series analysis
time series segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | The Segmented iHMM: A Simple, Efficient Hierarchical Infinite HMM · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › markov processes
markov jump processes |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | JUMP-Means: Small-Variance Asymptotics for Markov Jump Processes · ICML 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
small-variance asymptotics |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | JUMP-Means: Small-Variance Asymptotics for Markov Jump Processes · ICML 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Knowledge Distillation via Constrained Variational Inference · AAAI 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Knowledge Distillation via Constrained Variational Inference · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › hierarchical modeling
hierarchical bayesian model |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Priors over Recurrent Continuous Time Processes · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
stochastic processes |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Priors over Recurrent Continuous Time Processes · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
time series analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Priors over Recurrent Continuous Time Processes · NIPS 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Variational Particle Approximations · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning: Integrating Temporal Abstraction and Intrinsic Motivation · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › hierarchical modeling
hierarchical model |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | The Segmented iHMM: A Simple, Efficient Hierarchical Infinite HMM · ICML 2016 |
Medical and health informatics
disease progression modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Priors over Recurrent Continuous Time Processes · NIPS 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
label-guided token-level retrieval · 0.9error correction prompting · 0.9variational inference · 0.6knowledge distillation · 0.6automatic differentiation variational inference · 0.6inter-annotator agreement · 0.4discrepancy ratio · 0.4regularization · 0.4confusion matrix estimation · 0.4decision boundary crossing · 0.3segmentation · 0.2hierarchical infinite HMM · 0.2hierarchical modeling · 0.1gibbs sampling · 0.1Particle MCMC · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | LLMs are Better Than You Think: Label-Guided In-Context Learning for Named Entity RecognitionabstractIn-context learning (ICL) enables large language models (LLMs) to perform new tasks using only a few demonstrations.In Named Entity Recognition (NER), demonstrations are typically selected based on semantic similarity to the test instance, ignoring training labels and resulting in suboptimal performance.We introduce DEER, a new method that leverages training labels through token-level statistics to improve ICL performance.DEER first enhances example selection with a label-guided, token-based retriever that prioritizes tokens most informative for entity recognition.It then prompts the LLM to revisit error-prone tokens, which are also identified using label statistics, and make targeted corrections.Evaluated on five NER datasets using four different LLMs, DEER consistently outperforms existing ICL methods and approaches the performance of supervised fine-tuning.Further analysis shows its effectiveness on both seen and unseen entities and its robustness in low-resource settings.1 Fan Bai 0006, Hamid Hassanzadeh, Ardavan Saeedi, Mark Dredze |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2022 | Knowledge Distillation via Constrained Variational InferenceabstractKnowledge distillation has been used to capture the knowledge of a teacher model and distill it into a student model with some desirable characteristics such as being smaller, more efficient, or more generalizable. In this paper, we propose a framework for distilling the knowledge of a powerful discriminative model such as a neural network into commonly used graphical models known to be more interpretable (e.g., topic models, autoregressive Hidden Markov Models). Posterior of latent variables in these graphical models (e.g., topic proportions in topic models) is often used as feature representation for predictive tasks. However, these posterior-derived features are known to have poor predictive performance compared to the features learned via purely discriminative approaches. Our framework constrains variational inference for posterior variables in graphical models with a similarity preserving constraint. This constraint distills the knowledge of the discriminative model into the graphical model by ensuring that input pairs with (dis)similar representation in the teacher model also have (dis)similar representation in the student model. By adding this constraint to the variational inference scheme, we guide the graphical model to be a reasonable density model for the data while having predictive features which are as close as possible to those of a discriminative model. To make our framework applicable to a wide range of graphical models, we build upon the Automatic Differentiation Variational Inference (ADVI), a black-box inference framework for graphical models. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework on two real-world tasks of disease subtyping and disease trajectory modeling. Ardavan Saeedi, Yuria Utsumi, Li Sun 0010, Kayhan Batmanghelich, Li-Wei H. Lehman |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Discrepancy Ratio: Evaluating Model Performance When Even Experts Disagree on the Truth
Igor Lovchinsky, Alon Daks, Israel Malkin, Pouya Samangouei, Ardavan Saeedi, Swami Sankaranarayanan, Tomer Gafner, Ben Sternlieb, Patrick Maher, Nathan Silberman |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2019 | Learning From Noisy Labels by Regularized Estimation of Annotator ConfusionabstractThe predictive performance of supervised learning algorithms depends on the quality of labels. In a typical label collection process, multiple annotators provide subjective noisy estimates of the ``truth" under the influence of their varying skill-levels and biases. Blindly treating these noisy labels as the ground truth limits the accuracy of learning algorithms in the presence of strong disagreement. This problem is critical for applications in domains such as medical imaging where both the annotation cost and inter-observer variability are high. In this work, we present a method for simultaneously learning the individual annotator model and the underlying true label distribution, using only noisy observations. Each annotator is modeled by a confusion matrix that is jointly estimated along with the classifier predictions. We propose to add a regularization term to the loss function that encourages convergence to the true annotator confusion matrix. We provide a theoretical argument as to how the regularization is essential to our approach both for the case of single annotator and multiple annotators. Despite the simplicity of the idea, experiments on image classification tasks with both simulated and real labels show that our method either outperforms or performs on par with the state-of-the-art methods and is capable of estimating the skills of annotators even with a single label available per image. Ryutaro Tanno, Ardavan Saeedi, Swami Sankaranarayanan, Daniel C. Alexander, Nathan Silberman |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2018 | Multimodal Prediction and Personalization of Photo Edits with Deep Generative ModelsabstractProfessional-grade software applications are powerful but complicated – expert users can achieve impressive results, but novices often struggle to complete even basic tasks. Photo editing is a prime example: after loading a photo, the user is confronted with an array of cryptic sliders like "clarity", "temp", and "highlights". An automatically generated suggestion could help, but there is no single "correct" edit for a given image – different experts may make very different aesthetic decisions when faced with the same image, and a single expert may make different choices depending on the intended use of the image (or on a whim). We therefore want a system that can propose multiple diverse, high-quality edits while also learning from and adapting to a user’s aesthetic preferences. In this work, we develop a statistical model that meets these objectives. Our model builds on recent advances in neural network generative modeling and scalable inference, and uses hierarchical structure to learn editing patterns across many diverse users. Empirically, we find that our model outperforms other approaches on this challenging multimodal prediction task. Ardavan Saeedi, Matthew Hoffman 0001, Stephen DiVerdi, Asma Ghandeharioun, Matthew J. Johnson 0002, Ryan P. Adams |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2018 | ExplainGAN: Model Explanation via Decision Boundary Crossing Transformations
Pouya Samangouei, Ardavan Saeedi, Liam Nakagawa, Nathan Silberman |
ECCV (10) | 2 |
| 2017 | Variational Particle ApproximationsabstractApproximate inference in high-dimensional, discrete probabilistic models is a central problem in computational statistics and machine learning. This paper describes discrete particle variational inference (DPVI), a new approach that combines key strengths of Monte Carlo, variational and search- based techniques. DPVI is based on a novel family of particle- based variational approximations that can be fit using simple, fast, deterministic search techniques. Like Monte Carlo, DPVI can handle multiple modes, and yields exact results in a well- defined limit. Like unstructured mean-field, DPVI is based on optimizing a lower bound on the partition function; when this quantity is not of intrinsic interest, it facilitates convergence assessment and debugging. Like both Monte Carlo and combinatorial search, DPVI can take advantage of factorization, sequential structure, and custom search operators. This paper defines DPVI particle-based approximation family and partition function lower bounds, along with the sequential DPVI and local DPVI algorithm templates for optimizing them. DPVI is illustrated and evaluated via experiments on lattice Markov Random Fields, nonparametric Bayesian mixtures and block-models, and parametric as well as non-parametric hidden Markov models. Results include applications to real-world spike-sorting and relational modeling problems, and show that DPVI can offer appealing time/accuracy trade-offs as compared to multiple alternatives. Ardavan Saeedi, Tejas D. Kulkarni, Vikash Mansinghka 0001, Samuel Gershman |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2016 | The Segmented iHMM: A Simple, Efficient Hierarchical Infinite HMMabstractWe propose the segmented iHMM (siHMM), a hierarchical infinite hidden Markov model (iHMM) that supports a simple, efficient inference scheme. The siHMM is well suited to segmentation problems, where the goal is to identify points at which a time series transitions from one relatively stable regime to a new regime. Conventional iHMMs often struggle with such problems, since they have no mechanism for distinguishing between high-and low-level dynamics. Hierarchical HMMs (HHMMs) can do better, but they require much more complex and expensive inference algorithms. The siHMM retains the simplicity and efficiency of the iHMM, but outperforms it on a variety of segmentation problems, achieving performance that matches or exceeds that of a more complicated HHMM. Ardavan Saeedi, Matthew Hoffman 0001, Matthew J. Johnson 0002, Ryan P. Adams |
ICML | 1 |
| 2016 | Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning: Integrating Temporal Abstraction and Intrinsic MotivationabstractLearning goal-directed behavior in environments with sparse feedback is a major challenge for reinforcement learning algorithms. One of the key difficulties is insufficient exploration, resulting in an agent being unable to learn robust policies. Intrinsically motivated agents can explore new behavior for their own sake rather than to directly solve external goals. Such intrinsic behaviors could eventually help the agent solve tasks posed by the environment. We present hierarchical-DQN (h-DQN), a framework to integrate hierarchical action-value functions, operating at different temporal scales, with goal-driven intrinsically motivated deep reinforcement learning. A top-level q-value function learns a policy over intrinsic goals, while a lower-level function learns a policy over atomic actions to satisfy the given goals. h-DQN allows for flexible goal specifications, such as functions over entities and relations. This provides an efficient space for exploration in complicated environments. We demonstrate the strength of our approach on two problems with very sparse and delayed feedback: (1) a complex discrete stochastic decision process with stochastic transitions, and (2) the classic ATARI game -- `Montezuma's Revenge'. Tejas D. Kulkarni, Karthik Narasimhan, Ardavan Saeedi, Josh Tenenbaum |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2015 | JUMP-Means: Small-Variance Asymptotics for Markov Jump ProcessesabstractMarkov jump processes (MJPs) are used to model a wide range of phenomenon from disease progression to RNA path folding. However, existing methods suffer from a number of shortcomings: degenerate trajectories in the case of ML estimation of parametric models and poor inferential performance in the case of nonparametric models. We take a small-variance asymptotics (SVA) approach to overcome these limitations. We derive the small-variance asymptotics for parametric and nonparametric MJPs for both directly observed and hidden state models. In the parametric case we obtain a novel objective function which leads to non-degenerate trajectories. To derive the nonparametric version we introduce the gamma-gamma process, a novel extension to the gamma-exponential process. We propose algorithms for each of these formulations, which we call \emphJUMP-means. Our experiments demonstrate that JUMP-means is competitive with or outperforms widely used MJP inference approaches in terms of both speed and reconstruction accuracy. Jonathan H. Huggins, Karthik Narasimhan, Ardavan Saeedi, Vikash Mansinghka 0001 |
ICML | 3 |
| 2011 | Priors over Recurrent Continuous Time ProcessesabstractWe introduce the Gamma-Exponential Process (GEP), a prior over a large family of continuous time stochastic processes. A hierarchical version of this prior (HGEP; the Hierarchical GEP) yields a useful model for analyzing complex time series. Models based on HGEPs display many attractive properties: conjugacy, exchangeability and closed-form predictive distribution for the waiting times, and exact Gibbs updates for the time scale parameters. After establishing these properties, we show how posterior inference can be carried efficiently using Particle MCMC methods [1]. This yields a MCMC algorithm that can resample entire sequences atomically while avoiding the complications of introducing slice and stick auxiliary variables of the beam sampler [2]. We applied our model to the problem of estimating the disease progression in multiple sclerosis [3], and to RNA evolutionary modeling [4]. In both domains, we found that our model outperformed the standard rate matrix estimation approach. Ardavan Saeedi, Alexandre Bouchard-Côté |
NIPS | 1 |