Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arefin Huq

dblp:20/11208 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 60% Computational complexity · 20% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 20%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › linear programming relaxation
extended formulations
0.212016
The matching problem has no small symmetric SDP · SODA 2016
Mathematical optimization
linear programming
0.212016
The matching problem has no small symmetric SDP · SODA 2016
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
matching
0.212016
The matching problem has no small symmetric SDP · SODA 2016
Computational complexity
proof complexity
0.212016
The matching problem has no small symmetric SDP · SODA 2016
Mathematical optimization
semidefinite programming
0.212016
The matching problem has no small symmetric SDP · SODA 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semidefinite programming · 0.2lasserre relaxation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 The matching problem has no small symmetric SDP
abstract
Yannakakis [27, 26] showed that the matching problem does not have a small symmetric linear program. Rothvoß [23] recently proved that any, not necessarily symmetric, linear program also has exponential size. It is natural to ask whether the matching problem can be expressed compactly in a framework such as semidefinite programming (SDP) that is more powerful than linear programming but still allows efficient optimization. We answer this question negatively for symmetric SDPs: any symmetric SDP for the matching problem has exponential size. We also show that an O(k)-round Lasserre SDP relaxation for the asymmetric metric traveling salesperson problem yields at least as good an approximation as any symmetric SDP relaxation of size nk. The key technical ingredient underlying both these results is an upper bound on the degree needed to derive polynomial identities that hold over the space of matchings or traveling salesperson tours.
Gábor Braun, Jonah Brown-Cohen, Arefin Huq, Sebastian Pokutta, Prasad Raghavendra, Aurko Roy, Benjamin Weitz, Daniel Zink
SODA3