Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Connah

dblp:20/1177 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers
Image and video processing · 68% Computational photography and imaging · 21% Geometric modeling and processing · 10%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing
image fusion
0.322014
Spectral Edge Image Fusion: Theory and Applications · ECCV (5) 2014
Lookup-Table-Based Gradient Field Reconstruction · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2011
Computational photography and imaging
camera characterization
0.212016
Weighted Constrained Hue-Plane Preserving Camera Characterization · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2016
Image and video processing › color image processing
color correction
0.212016
Weighted Constrained Hue-Plane Preserving Camera Characterization · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2016
Image and video processing › image fusion
gradient domain fusion
0.112011
Lookup-Table-Based Gradient Field Reconstruction · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2011
Geometric modeling and processing › surface reconstruction
gradient-field surface reconstruction
0.112011
Lookup-Table-Based Gradient Field Reconstruction · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2011
Image and video processing
image reconstruction
0.112011
Lookup-Table-Based Gradient Field Reconstruction · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weighted constrained matrixing · 0.2optimization · 0.2spectral edge fusion · 0.2multichannel gradient mapping · 0.1lookup table · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 A Non-invasive 2D Digital Imaging Method for Detection of Surface Lesions Using Machine Learning
abstract
As part of the cancer drug development process, evaluation in experimental subcutaneous tumour transplantation models is a key process. This involves implanting tumour material underneath the mouse skin and measuring tumour growth using calipers. This methodology has been proven to have poor reproducibility and accuracy due to observer variation. Furthermore the physical pressure placed on the tumour using calipers is not only distressing for the mouse but could also lead to tumour damage. Non-invasive digital imaging of the tumour would reduce handling stresses and allow volume determination without any potential tumour damage. This is challenging as the tumours sit under the skin and have the same colour pattern as the mouse body making them hard to differentiate in a 2D image. We used the pre-trained convolutional neural network VGG-16 and extracted multiple layers in an attempt to accurately locate the tumour. When using the layer FC7 after RELU activation for extraction, a recognition rate of 89.85% was achieved.
Nosheen Hussain, Patricia Cooper, Steven Shnyder, Hassan Ugail, Ali Maina Bukar, David Connah
CW6
2016 Weighted Constrained Hue-Plane Preserving Camera Characterization
abstract
Color correction relates device-dependent sensor responses (RGB) to device independent color values ($XYZ$). Here, we present a new approach to Hue-plane preserving color correction (HPPCC) using weighted constrained$3 \times 3$matrices. Hue-plane preservation was introduced in[1]in conjunction with an HPPCC method. That method maps using a finite number of local white point preserving$3 \times 3$matrices, each of which operates in a Hue-angle delimited subregion of device space defined by the white and two adjacent chromatic training set colors. However, that formulation does not leave room for optimization or continuity beyond$C^{0}$in the transitions between the subregions. To remedy that, our new method uses Hue-angle specific weighted matrixing: given a device RGB from which a device Hue-angle is derived, a corresponding transformation matrix is found as the normalized weighted sum of all precalculated constrained white point and training color preserving matrices. Each weight is calculated as a power function of the minimum difference between the device and the training color Hue-angle. The weighting function provides local influence to the matrices that are in close Hue-angle proximity to the device color. The power of the function is optimized for global accuracy. We call this HPPCC by weighted constrained matrixing.1Experiments performed using different input spectra show that our method consistently improves on both stability and accuracy compared with the state-of-the-art methods.1Patent Pending: PCT/2015/000054
Casper Find Andersen, David Connah
IEEE Trans. Image Process.2
2014 Spectral Edge Image Fusion: Theory and Applications
David Connah, Mark S. Drew, Graham D. Finlayson
ECCV (5)1
2011 Lookup-Table-Based Gradient Field Reconstruction
abstract
In computer vision, there are many applications, where it is advantageous to process an image in the gradient domain and then reintegrate the gradient field: important examples include shadow removal, lightness calculation, and data fusion. A serious problem with this approach is that the reconstruction step often introduces artefacts-commonly, smoothed and smeared edges-to the recovered image. This is a result of the inherent ill-posedness of reintegrating a nonintegrable field. Artefacts can be diminished but not removed, by using complex to highly complex reintegration techniques. Here, we present a remarkably simple (and on the face of it naive) algorithm for reconstructing gradient fields. Suppose we start with a multichannel original, and from it derive a (possibly one of many) 1-D gradient field; for many applications, the derived gradient field will be nonintegrable. Here, we propose a lookup-table-based map relating the multichannel original to a reconstructed scalar output image, whose gradient best matches the target gradient field. The idea, at base, is that if we learn how to map the gradients of the multichannel original onto the desired output gradient, and then using the lookup table (LUT) constraint, we effectively derive the mapping from the multichannel input to the desired, reintegrated, image output. While this map could take a variety of forms, here we derive the best map from the multichannel gradient as a (nonlinear) function of the input to each of the target scalar gradients. In this framework, reconstruction is a simple equation-solving exercise of low dimensionality. One obvious application of our method is to the image-fusion problem, e.g., the problem of converting a color or higher-D image into grayscale. We will show, through extensive experiments and complementary theoretical arguments, that our straightforward method preserves the target contrast as well as do complex previous reintegration methods, but without artefacts, and with a substantially cheaper computational cost. Finally, we demonstrate the generality of the method by applying it to gradient field reconstruction in an additional area, the shading recovery problem.
Graham D. Finlayson, David Connah, Mark S. Drew
IEEE Trans. Image Process.2
2004 Comparison of linear spectral reconstruction methods for multispectral imaging
David Connah, Jon Yngve Hardeberg, Stephen Westland
ICIP1
1988 A Testbed for Research on Cooperating Agents
David Connah, Martin Shiels, Peter Wavish
ECAI1