Minna Pikkarainen

dblp:20/159 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
18ranked-venue papers
9as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-4516-6584ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 16 · 9 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 67% Software maintenance and evolution · 33%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
software process
0.112008
Ahaa --agile, hybrid assessment method for automotive, safety critical smes · ICSE 2008
Requirements engineering and software design › software process
software process assessment
0.112008
Ahaa --agile, hybrid assessment method for automotive, safety critical smes · ICSE 2008
Software maintenance and evolution
software process improvement
0.112008
Ahaa --agile, hybrid assessment method for automotive, safety critical smes · ICSE 2008
Embedded and real-time systems › automotive embedded systems
automotive software
0.012008
Ahaa --agile, hybrid assessment method for automotive, safety critical smes · ICSE 2008
Embedded and real-time systems › critical systems
safety-critical systems
0.012008
Ahaa --agile, hybrid assessment method for automotive, safety critical smes · ICSE 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

agile practices · 0.2CMMI · 0.2Automotive SPICE · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Care Pathway as the Basis for Collaborative Business Model Innovation in Healthcare
Julius Francis Gomes, Marika Iivari, Timo Koivumäki, Milla Immonen, Miia Jansson, Minna Pikkarainen, Kirsi Rasmus, Yueqiang Xu
PRO-VE6
2017 How MyData is Transforming the Business Models for Health Insurance Companies
Marika Iivari, Minna Pikkarainen, Timo Koivumäki
PRO-VE2
2014 Challenges and industry practices for managing software variability in small and medium sized enterprises
Tuomas Ihme, Minna Pikkarainen, Susanna Teppola, Jukka Kääriäinen, Olivier Biot
Empir. Softw. Eng.2
2012 Strengths and barriers behind the successful agile deployment - insights from the three software intensive companies in Finland
Minna Pikkarainen, Outi Salo, Raija Kuusela, Pekka Abrahamsson
Empir. Softw. Eng.1
2010 Systematic Piloting of Agile Methods in the Large: Two Cases in Embedded Systems Development
Jeanette Heidenberg, Mari Matinlassi, Minna Pikkarainen, Piia Hirkman, Jari Partanen
PROFES3
2009 Towards a Better Understanding of CMMI and Agile Integration - Multiple Case Study of Four Companies
Minna Pikkarainen
PROFES1
2009 Customer Communication Challenges and Solutions in Globally Distributed Agile Software Development
Minna Pikkarainen, Mikko Korkala
PROFES1
2009 An industrial case of exploiting product line architectures in agile software development
Muhammad Ali Babar 0001, Tuomas Ihme, Minna Pikkarainen
SPLC3
2009 Distributed Agile Development: A Case Study of Customer Communication Challenges
Mikko Korkala, Minna Pikkarainen, Kieran Conboy
XP2
2009 What Skills Do We Really Need in Agile Software Development? - Discussion of Industrial Impacts and Challenges
Minna Pikkarainen, Kieran Conboy, Daniel Karlstöm, Jari Still, Joshua Kerievsky
XP1
2009 Where Agile Research Meets Industry Needs: Starting from a 10-Year Retrospective
Xiaofeng Wang 0001, Kieran Conboy, Minna Pikkarainen, Michael T. Lane
XP3
2008 Ahaa --agile, hybrid assessment method for automotive, safety critical smes
abstract
The need for software is increasingly growing in the automotive industry. Software development projects are, however, often troubled by time and budget overruns, resulting in systems that do not fulfill customer requirements. Both research and industry lack strategies to combine reducing the long software development lifecycles (as required by time-to-market demands) with increasing the quality of the software developed. Software process improvement (SPI) provides the first step in the move towards software quality, and assessments are a vital part of this process. Unfortunately, software process assessments are often expensive and time consuming. Additionally, they often provide companies with a long list of issues without providing realistic suggestions. The goal of this paper is to describe a new low-overhead assessment method that has been designed specifically for small-to-medium-sized (SMEs) organisations wishing to be automotive software suppliers. This assessment method integrates the structured-ness of the plan-driven SPI models of Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) and Automotive SPICE with the flexibleness of agile practices.
Fergal McCaffery, Minna Pikkarainen, Ita Richardson
ICSE2
2008 The impact of agile practices on communication in software development
Minna Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, Outi Salo, Pekka Abrahamsson, Jari Still
Empir. Softw. Eng.1
2006 A Practical Approach for Deploying Agile Methods
Minna Pikkarainen, Outi Salo
XP1
2005 Deploying Agile Practices in Organizations: A Case Study
Minna Pikkarainen, Outi Salo, Jari Still
EuroSPI1
2005 An Approach for Assessing Suitability of Agile Solutions: A Case Study
Minna Pikkarainen, Ulla Passoja
XP1
2004 Automatic Measurement at Nokia Mobile Phones: A Case of SDL Based Software Development
Minna Pikkarainen, Matias Vierimaa, Hannu Tanner, Raija Suikki
PROFES1
2001 Contexts of KM Based SPI: The Case of Software Design Experience Reuse
Veikko Seppänen, Seija Komi-Sirviö, Annukka Mäntyniemi, Tua Rahikkala, Minna Pikkarainen
PROFES5